Motor execution affects action prediction

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-36

  Springer, Anne ^a,b   Brandstädter, Simone ^a   Liepelt, Roman ^a,c   Birngruber, Teresa ^a   Giese, Martin ^d   Mechsner, Franz ^e   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^e NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action prediction; Common coding; Internal simulation; Motor execution; Perception action link

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955123142     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bertelson P., Tisseyre F. The time course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 20:297-300.
2. Blakemore S.J., Frith C. The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:260-267.
3. Brass M., Bekkering H., Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica 2001, 106:3-22.
4. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 13:400-404.
5. Craighero L., Bello A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:492-502.
6. Christensen A., Ilg W., Karnath H.-O., Giese M.A. Influence of spatial and temporal congruency between executed and observed movements on the recognition of biological motion. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(8):614. 10.1167/9.8.614.
7. Decety J., Grèzes J. The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior. Brain Research 2006, 1079:4-14.
8. Decety J., Grèzes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:172-178.
9. Dinstein I., Hasson U., Rubin N., Heeger D.J. Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 98:1415-1427.
10. Flanagan J.R., Johansson R.S. Action plans used in action observation. Nature 2003, 424:769-771.
11. Gallese V. Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2005, 4:23-48.
12. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119:593-609.
13. Gillmeister H., Catmur C., Liepelt R., Brass M., Heyes C. Experience-based priming of body parts: A study of action imitation. Brain Research 2008, 1217:157-170.
14. Graf M., Reitzner B., Corves C., Casile A., Giese M., Prinz W. Predicting point-light actions in real-time. NeuroImage 2007, 36:T22-T32.
15. Grèzes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 12:1-19.
16. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioural Brain Science 2004, 27:377-442.
17. Hamilton A., Wolpert D., Frith U. Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology 2004, 14:493-498.
18. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
19. Huynh H., Feldt L.S. Conditions under which the mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1970, 65:1582-1589.
20. Iacoboni M., Dapretto M. The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 2006, 7:942.
21. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 2001, 14:S103-S109.
22. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
23. Kilner J.M., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Process 2007, 8:159-166.
24. Kilner J.M., Marchant J.L., Frith C.D. Relationship between activity in human primary motor cortex during action observation and the mirror neuron system. Plosone 2009, 4:1-10.
25. Kilner J.M., Paulignan Y., Blakemore S.-J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 2003, 13:522-525.
26. Kilner J.M., Vargas C., Duval S., Blakemore S.J., Sirigu A. Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:1299-1301.
27. Knoblich G., Seigerschmidt E., Flach R., Prinz W. Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002, 55:1027-1046.
28. Liepelt R., Prinz W., Brass M. When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition 2010, 115(3):426-434.
29. Liepelt R., von Cramon D.Y., Brass M. What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(3):578-591.
30. Marconi B., Pecchioli C., Koch G., Caltagirone C. Functional overlap between hand and forearm motor cortical representations during motor cognitive tasks. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:1767-1775.
31. Oldfield R.C. Assessment and analysis of handedness - Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
32. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
33. Prinz W. A common coding approach to perception and action. Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches 1990, 167-201. Springer, Berlin. O. Neumann, W. Prinz (Eds.).
34. Sambrook T.D. Does visual perspective matter in imitation?. Perception 1998, 27:1461-1473.
35. Sanders A.F. Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
36. Sato A. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequences of others' actions. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:1219-1227.
37. Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W. Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11(8):349-355.
38. Sebanz N., Knoblich G. Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009, 1(2):353-367.
39. Springer A., Prinz W. Action semantics modulate action prediction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63(11):2141-2158.
40. Stadler, W., Schubotz, R., von Cramon, D. Y., Springer, A., Graf, M., & Prinz, W. (in press). Predicting and memorizing observed action: Differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Brain Mapping, doi:10.1002/hbm.20949.
41. Thornton I.M., Knoblich G. Action perception: Seeing the world through a moving body. Current Biology 2006, 16(1):R27-R29.
42. Verfaillie K., Daems A. Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:217-232.
43. Wapner S., Cirillo L. Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Development 1968, 39:887-894.
44. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:460-473.
45. Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R. Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1479-1492.
46. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Current Biology 2001, 11:R729-R732.
47. Zwickel J., Grosjean M., Prinz W. Seeing while moving: Measuring the online influence of action on perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60(8):1063-1071.