How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: An Event Related Potentials study

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-86

  Maguire, Mandy J ^a   White, Joshua ^a   Brier, Matthew R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Event Related Potentials; Middle childhood; Response inhibition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT INHIBITION; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SCHOOL CHILD; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; CHILD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 79955104564     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Azizian A., Freitas A.L., Parvaz M.A., Squires M.K. Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:253-260.
2. Barkley R.A., Edwards G., Laneri M., Fletcher K., Metevia L. Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2001, 29:541-556.
3. Barry R.J., Johnstone S.J., Clarke A.R. Electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Event-related potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114:184-198.
4. Batty M., Taylor M.J. Visual categorization during childhood: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(4):482-490.
5. Bennington J.Y., Polich J. Comparison of P300 from passive and active tasks for auditory and visual stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1999, 34:171-177.
6. Brocki K.C., Bohlin G. Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004, 26:571-593.
7. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A., van Staveren A.S.J. Response priming in a go/nogo task: Do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112(9):1660-1671.
8. Ciesielski K.T., Harris R.J., Cofer L.F. Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the go/no-go task in children. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:882-892.
9. Courchesne E., Courchesne R.Y., Hillyard S.A. The effects of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia 1978, 16:189-199.
10. Cragg L., Nation K. Go or nogo? Developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood. Developmental Science 2008, 11(6):819-827.
11. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. Visual novel stimuli in an ERP novelty oddball paradigm: Effects of familiarity on repetition and recognition memory. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:11-29.
12. Davis E.P., Bruce J., Snyder K., Nelson C.A. The X-trials: Neural correlates of an inhibitory control task in children and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(3):432-443.
13. Durston S., Thomas K.M., Yang Y., Ulug A.M., Zimmerman R.D., Casey B.J. A neural basis for development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science 2002, 5(4):F9-F16.
14. Ferree T.C. Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp EEG. Brain Topography 2006, 19(1/2):43-52.
15. French R. The subtlety of sameness: A theory and computer model of analogy making 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. French R., Mareschal D., Mermillod M., Quinn P.C. The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(3):382-397.
17. Friedman D., Hamberger M., Ritter W. Event-related potentials as indicators of repetition priming in young and older adults: Amplitude, duration, and scalp distribution. Psychology & Aging 1993, 8:120-125.
18. Friedman N.P., Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:101-135.
19. Goldstone R.L., Barsalou L.W. Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition 1998, 65:231-262.
20. Johnstone S.J., Dimoska A., Smith J.L., Barry R.J., Pleffer C.B., Chiswick D., et al. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12years: Performance and event-related potential indices. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 63:25-38.
21. Johnstone S.J., Pleffer C.B., Barry R.J., Clarke A.R., Smith J.L. Inhibitory processing during the Go/Nogo task: A behavioral and event-related potential study of children and adults. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19:11-23.
22. Jonkman L. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: A Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Research 2006, 1097:181-193.
23. Jonkman L., Lansbergen M., Stauder J.E.A. Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:752-761.
24. Junghöfer M., Elbert T., Tucker D.M., Braun C. The polar average reference effect a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110(6):1149-1155.
25. Kaplan E., Goodglass H., Weintraub S. The boston naming test 1983, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 2nd ed.
26. Kincses T.Z., Chadaide Z., Varga E.T., Antal A., Paulus W. Task-related temporal and topographical changes of cortical activity during ultra-rapid visual categorization. Brain Research 2006, 1112:191-200.
27. Kirmizi-Alsan E., Bayraktaroglu Z., Gurvit H., Keskin Y.H., Emre M., Demiralp T. Comparative analysis of event related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Brain Research 2006, 1104:114-128.
28. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 2001, 38(3):557-577.
29. Lavric A., Pizzagalli D.A., Forstmeier S. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 20(9):2483-2488.
30. Levin H.S., Culhane K.A., Hartmann J., Evankovich K., Mattson A.J., Harward H., et al. Developmental changes in performance on tests of purported frontal lobe functioning. Developmental Neuropsychology 1991, 7:377-395.
31. Lindqvist S., Thorell L.B. Brief report: Manipulation of task difficulty in inhibitory control tasks. Child Neuropsychology 2009, 15:1-7.
32. Liston C., Watts R., Tottenham N., Davidson M.C., Niogi S., Ulug A.M., et al. Frontostriatal microstructure modulates efficient recruitment of cognitive control. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(4):553-560.
33. Maguire M.J., Brier M.R., Moore P.S., Ferree T.C., Ray D., Mostofsky S., et al. The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 inhibitory responses. Brain and Cognition 2009, 71(3):196-203.
34. Mandler J., Bauer P., McDonough L. Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23:263-298.
35. Murphy G.L., Kaplan A.S. Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:962-982.
36. Nigg J.T. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126(2):220-246.
37. Nunez P.L. A study of origins of the time dependencies of scalp EEG: II - Experimental support of theory. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 1981, 28:281-288.
38. Opitz B. ERP and fMRI correlates of target and novelty processing. Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings 2003, 117-132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. J. Polich (Ed.).
39. Perrin F., Pemier J., Betrand O., Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989, 72:184-187.
40. Polich J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology 1989, 17:19-28.
41. Polich J. Theoretical overview of the P3a and P3b. Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings 2003, 83-98. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. J. Polich (Ed.).
42. Proverbio A.M., Del Zotto M., Crotti N., Zani A. A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli than are difficult to suppress. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2009, 5(25):1-11.
43. Rosch E., Mervis C.B., Gray W.D., Johnson D.M., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 1976, 8:382-439.
44. Rubia K., Smith A.B., Woolley J., Nosarti C., Heyman I., Taylor E., et al. Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control. Human Brain Mapping 2006, 27(12):973-993.
45. Rugg M.D., Doyle M.C. Event-related potentials and stimulus repetition in direct and indirect tests of memory. Cognitive electrophysiology 1994, Birkhauser, Boston. H.J. Heinze, T.F. Munte, G.R. Mangun (Eds.).
46. Rugg M.D., Furda J., Lorist M. The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. Psychophysiology 1988, 25:55-63.
47. Schapkin S.A., Falkenstein M., Marks A., Griefahn B. Executive brain functions after exposure to nocturnal traffic effects of task difficulty and sleep quality. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2006, 96:693-702.
48. Schumacher R., Wirth M., Perrig W.J., Strik W., Koenig T. ERP correlates of superordinate category activation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2009, 72(2):134-144.
49. Schyns P.G., Goldstone R.L., Thibaut J.-P. The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1998, 21:1-54.
50. Shilling V.M., Chetwynd A., Rabbitt P.M.A. Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: An investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:605-619.
51. Shue K.L., Douglas V.I. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the frontal lobe syndrome. Brain and Cognition 1992, 20:104-124.
52. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: Response preparation, execution and inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 61(2):121-133.
53. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Response priming in the GO/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(2):343-355.
54. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119:704-714.
55. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:1461-1492.
56. Tanaka J., Luu P., Weisbrod M., Kiefer M. Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials. NeuroReport 1999, 10(4):829-835.
57. Thorpe S.J., Fize D., Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 1996, 381:520-522.
58. VanRullen R., Thorpe S.J. The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:454-461.
59. Velanova K., Wheeler M.E., Luna B. The maturation of task set-related activation supports late developmental improvements in inhibitory control. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(40):12558-12567.
60. Wiersema R., van der Meere J., Roeyers H., Van Coster R., Baeyens D. Event rate and event-related potentials in ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2006, 47:560-567.
61. Williams B.R., Ponesse J.S., Schachar R.J., Logan G.D., Tannock R. Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:205-213.