A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Volumn 5, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Proverbio, Alice M ^a   Del Zotto, Marzia ^a   Crotti, Nicola ^a,b,c   Zani, Alberto ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SCALP; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 67650721466     PISSN: 17449081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-25     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Smith JL Johnstone SJ Barry RJ Movement-related potentials in the Go/ NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:704. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.042 18164657
2. Pfefferbaum A Ford JM Weller BJ Kopell BS ERPs to response production and inhibition Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985, 60:423-434. 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-X 2580694
3. Bruin KJ Wijers AA Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:1172. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4 12088714
4. Salisbury DF Rutherford B Shenton ME McCarley RW Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:1676. 2650488 11514251 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00607-1
5. Van't Ent D Apkarian P Motoric response inhibition in finger movement and saccadic eye movement: A comparative study Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1058. 10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00036-4 10402093
6. Jodo E Kayama Y Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 82:477. 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L 1375556
7. Kopp B Mattler U Goertz R Rist F N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 99:19. 8758967
8. Bekker EM Kenemans JL Verbaten MN Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/ NoGo task Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:221. 10.1016/ j.cogbrainres.2004.08.011 15653295
9. Kok A Overlap between P300 and movement-related-potentials: A response to Verleger Biol Psychol 1988, 27:51. 10.1016/0301-0511(88)90005-1 3251560
10. Beste C Saft C Andrich J Gold R Falkenstein M Response inhibition in Huntington's disease - A study using ERPs and sLORETA Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1290. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.008 18241897
11. Verleger R Paehge T Kolev V Yordanova J Jaskowski P On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3 Biol Psychol 2006, 73:298. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.05.005 16837117
12. Zani A Proverbio AM ERP signs of early selective attention effects to check size Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 95:277-292. 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00078-D 8529559
13. DeValois RL Albrecht DG Thorel LG Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in the macaque visual cortex Vision Res 1982, 22:545-559. 10.1016/ 0042-6989(82)90113-4 7112954
14. Blakemore C Campbell FW On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images J Physiol. 1969, 203(1):237-260. 1351526 5821879
15. Pantle A Sekuler R Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision Science 1968, 162:1146-1148. 10.1126/science.162.3858.1146-a 5698858
16. Zani A Proverbio AM Attention modulation of short latency ERPs by selective attention to conjunction of spatial frequency and location J Psychophysiol 1997, 11:21-32.
17. Oostenveld R Praamstra P The five percent electrode system for high resolution EEG and ERP measurements Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:713-719. 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7 11275545
18. Pasqual-Marqui RD Michel CM Lehmann D Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain Int J Psychophysiol 1994, 18:49-65. 10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X 7876038
19. Palmero-Soler E Dolan K Hadamschek V Tass PA swLORETA: A novel approach to robust source localization and synchronization tomography Phys Med Biol 2007, 52:1783-1800. 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/002 17374911
20. Proverbio AM Del Zotto M Zani A Electrical neuroimaging evidence that spatial frequency-based selective attention affects V1 activity as early as 40 ms in humans
21. Zani A Proverbio AM ERP signs of frontal and occipital processing of visual targets and distracters within and without the channel of spatial attention Focus on Neuropsychology Research Dupri JR 2006, 38-88.
22. Previc FH Harter MR Electrophysiological and behavioral indicants of selective attention to multifeature gratings Percept Psychophys 1982, 32:465-472. 7162948
23. Harter MR Previc FH Size-specific information channels and selective attention: Visual evoked potential and behavioral measures Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978, 45:628-640. 10.1016/ 0013-4694(78)90163-3 81765
24. Cabeza R Ciaramelli E Olson IR Moscovitch M The parietal cortex and episodic memory: An attentional account Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:613. 2692883 18641668 10.1038/nrn2459
25. Starr A Sandroni P Michalewski HJ Readiness to respond in a target detection task: Pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 96:76. 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-E 7530191
26. Strik WK Fallgatter AJ Brandeis D Pascual-Marqui RD Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 108:406. 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00021-5 9714383
27. Qiu J Li H Liu Q Zhang Q Brain mechanism of response execution and inhibition: An event-related potential study Neuroreport. 2008, 19(1):121-125. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f3b104 18281905
28. Haupt S Axmacher N Cohen MX Elger CE Fell J Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task-related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm Hum Brain Mapp 2009. 19180558
29. MacDonald AW Cohen JD Stenger VA Carter CS Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control Science 2000, 288:1835-1838. 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 10846167
30. Daskalakis ZJ Farzan F Barr MS Maller JJ Chen R Fitzgerald PB Long-interval cortical inhibition from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study Neuropsychopharmacology 2008, 33:2860. 10.1038/ npp.2008.22 18322469
31. Blasi G Goldberg TE Weickert T Das S Kohn P Zoltick B Bertolino A Callicott JH Weinberger DR Mattay VS Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression Eur J Neurosci 2006, 23:1658-1664. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04680.x 16553630
32. Nyffeler T Müri RM Bucher-Ottiger Y Pierrot-Deseilligny C Gaymard B Rivaud-Pechoux S Inhibitory control of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the anti-saccade paradigm; a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Eur J Neurosci 2007, 26:1381-1385. 10.1111/ j.1460-9568.2007.05758.x 17767514
33. Desimone R Duncan J Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention Annu Rev Neurosci 1995, 18:193-222. 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 7605061
34. Miller EK Cohen JD An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function Annu Rev Neurosci 2001, 167-202. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 11283309
35. Kerns JG Cohen JD MacDonald AW III Cho RY Stenger VA Carter CS Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control Science 2004, 303:1023-1026. 10.1126/science.1089910 14963333
36. Chao LL Knight RT Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:167-177. 10.1162/089892998562636 9555105
37. Chao LL Knight RT Human prefrontal lesions increase distractibility to irrelevant sensory inputs Neuroreport. 1995, 21(12):1605-1610.
38. Wang L Liu X Guise KG Knight RT Ghajar J Fan J Effective connectivity of the fronto-parietal network during attentional control J Cogn Neurosci 2009.
39. Barceló F Suwazono S Knight RT Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:399-403. 10.1038/73975 10725931
40. Bradley RP Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: One function is sensory gating J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:1679-1690. 1343532 16269105 10.1162/089892905774589208
41. Aron AR Poldrack RA Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus J Neurosci 2006, 26:2424-2433. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006 16510720
42. Proverbio AM Zani A Avella C Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task Brain Cogn 1997, 34:311. 10.1006/brcg.1997.0901 9220094
43. Proverbio AM Minniti A Zani A Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1998, 6:321. 10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00039-6 9593970
44. Yamaguchi S Yamagata S Kobayashi S Cerebral asymmetry of the "top-down" allocation of attention to global and local features J Neurosci. 2000, 20(9):RC72. 10777814
45. Zanow F Knösche TR ASA-Advanced Source Analysis of Continuous and Event-Related EEG/MEG Signals Brain Topogr 2004, 16:287. 10.1023/ B:BRAT.0000032867.41555.d0 15379229