Comparison of P300 from passive and active tasks for auditory and visual stimuli

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 171-177

  Bennington, Jennifer Y ^a   Polich, John ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory vs. visual stimuli; Event related potentials; Oddball paradigm; P300; Passive vs. active tasks

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FANTASY; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0032756404     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00070-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berlad I., Pratt H. P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96:1995;472-474.
2. Cohen J., Polich J. On the number of trials needed for P300. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 25:1997;249-255.
3. Comerchero M., Polich J. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;24-30.
4. Courchesne E. Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroencephalagr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;754-766.
5. Donchin E. Surprise!.surprise? Psychophysiology. 18:1981;493-513.
6. Ford J.M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related potential ERPs to interruptions of a steady rhythm. Psychophysiology. 18:1981;322-330.
7. Ford J.M., Roth W.T., Kopell B.S. Auditory evoked potentials to unpredictable shifts in pitch. Psychophysiology. 13:1976;32-39.
8. Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;90-97.
9. Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N., Sjouw W., Slangen J.L. Effects of task relevance on habituation of visual single-trial ERPs and the skin conductance orienting response. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 6:1988;51-63.
10. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophys. 59:1984;9-20.
11. Kramer A.F., Schneider W., Fisk A., Donchin E. The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;33-42.
12. Lammers W.J., Badia P. Habituation of P300 to target stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;595-601.
13. Lew G.S., Polich J. P300, habituation, and response mode. Physiol. Behav. 53:1993;111-117.
14. McIsaac H., Polich J. Comparison of infant and adult P300 from auditory stimuli. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 53:1992;115-128.
15. Oades R.D., Zerbin D., Dittmann-Balcar A. The topography of event-related potentials in passive and active conditions of a 3-tone auditory oddball test. Int. J. Neurosci. 81:1995;249-264.
16. O'Donnell B.F., Friedman S., Squires N.K., Maloon A., Drachman D., Swearer J. Active and passive P3 latency in dementia. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 3:1990;164-179.
17. O'Donnell B.F., Friedman S., Swearer J.M., Drachman D. Active and passive P300 latency and psychometric performance: influence of age and individual differences. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 12:1992;185-187.
18. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9:1992;456-579.
19. Polich J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 63:1986;251-259.
20. Polich J. P300 development from auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;590-597.
21. Polich J. Comparison of P300 from a passive tone sequence paradigm and an active discrimination task. Psychophysiology. 24:1987;41-46.
22. Polich J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology. 17:1989;19-28.
23. Polich J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 74:1989;312-320.
24. Polich J. P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15:1998;14-33.
25. Polich J., McIsaac H.K. Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 17:1994;25-34.
26. Ravden D., Polich J. Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 30:1998;359-365.
27. Romero R., Polich J. P300 habituation from auditory and visual stimuli. Physiol. Behav. 59:1996;517-522.
28. Roth W.T. Auditory evoked responses to unpredictable stimuli. Psychophysiology. 10:1973;125-138.
29. Strayer D.L., Kramer A.F. Attentional requirements of automatic and controlled processing. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cog. 16:1990;67-82.