The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 196-203

  Maguire, Mandy J ^a   Brier, Matthew R ^a   Moore, Patricia S ^a   Ferree, Thomas C ^b   Ray, Dylan ^a   Mostofsky, Stewart ^c,d   Hart Jr , John ^a,b   Kraut, Michael A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual difficulty; Event Related Potentials; Go NoGo; Inhibition; N2 P3; Object animal categorization; Visual categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATIENT SELECTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 70350302384     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barkley R.A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997) 65-94
2. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A., and van Staveren A.S.J. Response priming in a go/nogo task: Do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?. Clinical Neurophysiology 112 9 (2001) 1660-1671
3. Ciesielski K.T., Harris R.J., and Cofer L.F. Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the go/no-go task in children. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 882-892
4. Courchesne E., Courchesne R.Y., and Hillyard S.A. The effects of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia 16 (1978) 189-199
5. Ferree T.C. Spherical splines and average referencing in scalp EEG. Brain Topography 19 1/2 (2006) 43-52
6. French R. The subtlety of sameness: A theory and computer model of analogy-making (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. French R., Mareschal D., Mermillod M., and Quinn P.C. The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorizaton by 3- to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 3 (2004) 382-397
8. Folstein J.R., and van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology 45 (2008) 152-170
9. Goldstone R.L., and Barsalou L.W. Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition 65 (1998) 231-262
10. Hasher L., and Quig M.B. Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information: Adult age differences. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 286-295
11. Jodo E., and Kayama Y. Relation of negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 82 (1992) 477-482
12. Junghöfer M., Elbert T., Tucker D.M., and Braun C. The polar average reference effect a bias in estimating the head surface integral in EEG recording. Clinical Neurophysiology 110 6 (1999) 1149-1155
13. Kaplan E., Goodglass H., and Weintraub S. The boston naming test. 2nd ed. (1983), Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia
14. Kincses T.Z., Chadaide Z., Varga E.T., Antal A., and Paulus W. Task-related temporal and topographical changes of cortical activity during ultra-rapid visual categorization. Brain Research 1112 (2006) 191-200
15. Kok A. Overlap between P300 and Movement-related potentials: A response to Verleger. Biological Psychology 27 (1988) 51-58
16. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
17. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., and Rist F. N2, P3, and the lateralized readiness potential in a no-go task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 99 (1996) 19-27
18. Lavric A., Pizzagalli D.A., and Forstmeier S. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience 20 9 (2004) 2483-2488
19. Logan G.D., and Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 295-327
20. Luu P., and Tucker D.M. Regulating action: Alternating activation of midline frontal and motor cortical networks. Clinical Neurophysiology 112 (2001) 1295-1306
21. McCarthy G., and Donchin E. A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 211 (1981) 77-80
22. Mostofsky S.H., and Simmonds D.J. Response inhibition and response selection: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (2008) 751-761
23. Murphy G.L., and Kaplan A.S. Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 53A (2000) 962-982
24. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., and Cohen J.D. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 157-160
25. Perner J., Lang B., and Kloo D. Theory of mind and self-control: More than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development 73 (2002) 752-767
26. Perrin F., Pernier J., Betrand O., and Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 72 (1989) 184-187
27. Posner M.I., and DiGirolamo G.J. Executive attention: Conflict, target detection and cognitive control. In: Parasuraman R. (Ed). The attentive brain (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 401-424
28. Polich J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology 17 (1989) 19-28
29. Ravden D., and Polich J. Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology 30 (1998) 359-365
30. Ruchkin D.S., Sutton S., and Tueting P. Emitted and evoked P300 potentials and variation in stimulus probability. Psychophysiology 12 (1975) 592-595
31. Schapkin S.A., Falkenstein M., Marks A., and Griefahn B. Executive brain functions after exposure to nocturnal traffic effects of task difficulty and sleep quality. European Journal of Applied Physiology 96 (2006) 693-702
32. Schyns P.G., Goldstone R.L., and Thibaut J.-P. The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1998) 1-54
33. Siakaluk P.D., Buchanan L., and Westbury C. The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks. Memory and Cognition 31 (2003) 100-113
34. Simpson A., and Riggs K.J. Conditions under which children experience inhibitory difficulty with a "button-press" go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 94 (2006) 18-26
35. Simson R., Vaughan Jr. H.G., and Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go-NoGo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 43 (1977) 864-875
36. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: Response preparation, execution and inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology 61 2 (2006) 121-133
37. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clinical Neurophysiology 118 2 (2007) 343-355
38. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., and Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 119 (2008) 704-714
39. Snodgrass J.G., and Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (1980) 1461-1492
40. Stadler W., Klimesch W., Pouthas V., and Ragot R. Differential effects of the stimulus sequence of CNV and P300. Brain Research 1123 (2006) 157-167
41. Thorpe S.J., and Fize D. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381 (1996) 520-522
42. VanRullen R., and Thorpe S.J. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception 30 (2001) 655-668
43. van Veen V., and Carter S.C. The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulated cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 593-602
44. Weintraub S. Neuropsychological assessment of mental state. In: Mesulam M.M. (Ed). Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology (2000), Oxford University Press, New York 121-173