Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the ocular response analyzer

Acta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Kopito, Robert ^a   Gaujoux, Thomas ^a   Montard, Romain ^a   Touzeau, Olivier ^a   Allouch, Cécile ^a   Borderie, Vincent ^a   Laroche, Laurent ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

Author keywords

cornea; corneal resistance factor; hysteresis; intraocular pressure; reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISCOELASTICITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955039196     PISSN: 1755375X     EISSN: 17553768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01957.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abitbol O, Bouden J, Doan S, Hoang-Xuan T, &, Gatinel D, (2010): Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 88: 116-119.
2. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeens-Roche K, Grover D, &, Quigley HA, (2006): Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 141: 868-875.
3. Dupps WJ, (2007): Hysteresis: New mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1530-1538.
4. Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, &, Weber PA, (2008): A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 3919-3926.
5. Hager A, Loge K, Fullhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, &, Wiegand W, (2007a): Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144: 341-346. (Pubitemid 47331402)
6. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, Grossherr M, &, Wiegand W, (2007b): The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologe 104: 484-489.
7. Herndon LW, (2006): Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17: 115-119. (Pubitemid 43790806)
8. Kirwan C, &, O'Keefe M, (2008): Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol 86: 215-218.
9. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, &, Lanigan B, (2006): Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 142: 990-992. (Pubitemid 44853910)
10. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, &, Garway-Heath DF, (2006): Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 5337-5347. (Pubitemid 46729154)
11. Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, &, Chui WS, (2007): Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 84: 909-914. (Pubitemid 47415167)
12. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, &, Wang J, (2007): Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 143: 616-622.
13. Luce DA, (2005): Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31: 156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
14. Mangouritsas G, Morphis G, Mourtzoukos S, &, Feretis E, (2009): Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 87: 901-905.
15. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, &, Garcia-Sanchez J, (2006):: Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 4410-4414. (Pubitemid 46579366)
16. Medeiros FA, &, Weinreb RN, (2006): Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 15: 364-370. (Pubitemid 44434988)
17. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, Mendiluce L, García-Gómez PJ, &, Seguí-Gómez M, (2008): Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49: 968-974.
18. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, &, Alió JL, (2007): Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33: 1371-1375. (Pubitemid 47096684)
19. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, &, Roberts CJ, (2007): Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143: 39-47.
20. Rao CR, (1964): The Use and Interpretation of Principal Component Analysis in Applied Research. Sankhya 26: 329-358.
21. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, &, Cunliffe I, (2007): Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 3026-3031. (Pubitemid 351261143)
22. Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, &, Qualls C, (2008): Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 85: 463-470.
23. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, Garra C, Maurice-Tison S, Saubusse E, &, Colin J, (2008): Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 34: 616-622. (Pubitemid 351444755)