To eat or not to eat pork, how frequently and how varied? Insights from the quantitative Q-PorkChains consumer survey in four European countries

Meat Science

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 619-626

  Verbeke, Wim ^a   Pérez Cueto, Federico J A ^a   Grunert, Klaus G ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Consumer; Frequency; Meat; Pork; Segmentation; Variety

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; FREQUENCY; PORK; SEGMENTATION; VARIETY;

MEATS;

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BELGIUM; BODY WEIGHT; DEMOGRAPHY; DENMARK; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBESITY; POLAND; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BELGIUM; DEMOGRAPHY; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; GERMANY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVERWEIGHT; POLAND; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SWINE; THINNESS;

EID: 79955033376     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alexander D.D., Cushing C.A., Lowe K.A., Sceurman B., Roberts M.A. Meta-analysis of animal fat or animal protein intake and colorectal cancer. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009, 89:1-8.
2. Balder H.F., Goldbohm R.A., van den Brandt P.A. Dietary patterns associated with male lung cancer risk in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005, 14:483-490.
3. Balder H.F., Virtanen M., Brants H.A., Krogh V., Dixon L.B., Tan F., et al. Common and country-specific dietary patterns in four European Cohort Studies. The Journal of Nutrition 2003, 133:4246-4251.
4. Brunsø K., Grunert K.G. Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: Food-related lifestyle. Advances in Consumer Research 1995, 22:475-480.
5. Chan J.M., Wang F., Holley E.A. Pancreatic cancer, animal protein and dietary fat in a population based study, San Francisco Bay Area, California. Cancer Causes & Control 2007, 18:1153-1167.
6. Cosgrove M., Flynn D., Kiely M. Consumption of red meat, white meat and processed meat in Irish adults in relation to dietary quality. The British Journal of Nutrition 2005, 93:933-942.
7. Demeyer D. Letter to the Editors: Balancing the risks and benefits of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption for both consumer and the environment. Meat Science 2010, 86:529-530.
8. Demeyer D., Honikel K., De Smet S. The World Cancer Research Fund report 2007: A challenge for the meat processing industry. Meat Science 2008, 80:953-959.
9. Dunlap R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56:425-442.
10. Ferguson L.R. Meat and cancer. Meat Science 2010, 84:308-313.
11. Hamstra A.M. Biotechnology in foodstuffs. Towards a model of consumer acceptance 1991, SWOKA, Den Haag.
12. Jiménez-Colmenarejo F., Ventanas J., Toldrá F. Nutritional composition of dry-cured ham and its role in a healthy diet. Meat Science 2010, 84:585-593.
13. Kristensen M.B., Hels O., Morberg C., Marving J., Bügel S., Tetens I. Pork meat increases iron absorption from a 5-day fully controlled diet when compared to a vegetarian diet with similar vitamin C and phytic acid content. The British Journal of Nutrition 2005, 94:78-83.
14. Larsson S.C., Bergkvist L., Wolk A. Processed meat consumption, dietary nitrosamines and stomach cancer risk in a cohort of Swedish women. International Journal of Cancer 2006, 119:915-919.
15. Linseisen J., Rohrmann S., Norat T., Gonzalez C.A., Dorronsoro Iraeta M., Morote Gómez P., et al. Dietary intake of different types and characteristics of processed meat which might be associated with cancer risk-Results from the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutrition 2004, 9:449-464.
16. Lüchtenborg M., Weijenberg M., de Goeij A.F.P., Wark P., Brink M., Roemn G., et al. Meat and fish consumption, APC gene mutations and hMLH1 expression in colon and rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study (The Netherlands). Cancer Causes & Control 2005, 16:1041-1054.
17. McCarthy M., O'Reilly S., Cotter L., De Boer M. Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market. Appetite 2004, 43:19-28.
18. Micha R., Wallace S.K., Mozaffarian D. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2010, 121:2271-2283.
19. Naska A., Fouskakis D., Oikonomou E., De Almeida M.D.V., Berg M.A., Gedrich K., et al. Dietary patterns and their socio-demographic determinants in 10 European countries: data from the DAFNE databank. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006, 60:181-190.
20. Nicklaus S. Development of food variety in children. Appetite 2009, 52:253-255.
21. Norat T., Bingham S., Ferrari P., Slimani N., Jenab M., Mazuir M., et al. Meat, fish and colorrectal cancer risk: The European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005, 97:906-916.
22. Orfanos P., Naska A., Trichopoulos D., Slimani N., Ferrari P., Van Bakel M., et al. Eating out of home and its correlates in 10 European countries. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutrition 2007, 10:1515-1525.
23. Robinson F. The nutritional contribution of meat to the British diet: Recent trends and analyses. Nutrition Bulletin 2001, 26:283-293.
24. Rubio J.A., Rubio M.A., Cabrerizo L., Burdaspal P., Carretero R., Gomez-Gerique J.A., et al. Effects of pork vs. veal consumption on serum lipids in healthy subjects. Nutrición Hospitalaria 2006, 21:75-83.
25. Sato Y., Nakaya N., Kuriyama S., Nishino Y., Tsubono Y., Tsuji I. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in Japan: The Miyagi Cohort Study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2006, 15:211-218.
26. Schultze M.B., Manson J.E., Willet W.C., Hu F.B. Processed meat intake and incidence of Type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Diabetologia 2003, 46:1465-1473.
27. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of Social Issues 1994, 50:19-45.
28. Schwartz S.H. The European Social Survey: Introducing a new source of cross-national data. Proceedings of a Workshop at the VII Regional Meeting of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Budapest, Hungary 2003.
29. Schwarz G. Estimating dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978, 6:461-464.
30. Shimp T.A., Sharma S. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research 1987, 24:280-289.
31. Verbeke W. Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 32:347-368.
32. Verbeke W., Pérez-Cueto F.J.A., de Barcellos M.D., Krystallis A., Grunert K.G. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science 2010, 84:284-292.
33. Verbeke W., Vackier I. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science 2004, 67:159-168.
34. Verbeke W., Vermeir I., Brunsø K. Consumer evaluation of fish quality as basis for fish market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:651-661.
35. Verbeke W., Viaene J. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:437-445.
36. Verbeke W., Viaene J., Guiot O. Health communication and consumer behaviour on meat in Belgium: From BSE until dioxin. Journal of Health Communication 1999, 4:345-357.
37. Williamson C.S., Foster R.K., Stanner S.A., Buttriss J. Red meat in the diet. Nutrition Bulletin 2005, 30:323-355.
38. World Cancer Research Fund Food, nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective 2007, WCRF / American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington DC, 517 pp.