Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: Effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 91-100

  Tsutsumi, Kimihiro ^a   Chikui, Toru ^a   Okamura, Kazutoshi ^a   Yoshiura, Kazunori ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cone angle; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Directional dependence; Measurement accuracy; Thresholds

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

ALUMINUM; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 79955001088     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:68-72.
2. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35:207-221.
3. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible:Visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:246-255.
4. Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zöller JE. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:216-225.
5. Stanford C, Oates T, Beirne R, Ellingsen JE. Thematic abstract review: Current role of cone-beam imaging tomography in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:343-346.
6. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:228-231.
7. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurement using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37:10-17.
8. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multiple spiral CT: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:225-234.
9. Yoshida Y, Morita Y, Honda E, Tomotake Y, Ichikawa T. Evaluation of measurement accuracy in imaging using a conebeam CT [in Japanese]. J Jpn Soc Oral Implant 2009; 22:3-14.
10. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104:551-559.
11. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28:245-248.
12. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38:609-625.
13. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E. Measurement of mandibles with microfocus X-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:239-246.
14. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33:291-294.
15. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:410-416.
16. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurement. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1261-1266.
17. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:446-454.
18. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37:80-93.
19. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37:309-318.
20. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IAB. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1558-1564.
21. Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA. Accuracy limits for determination of cortical width and density: The influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44:751-764.
22. Gomi T, Koshida K, Miyati T. Development of a cone angle weighted three-dimensional image reconstruction algorithm to reduce cone-beam artefacts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:398-406.
23. Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, et al. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: A second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:744-750.
24. Yan S, Wang C, Ye M. A method based on moving least squares for XRII image distortion correction. Med Phys 2007; 34:4194-4206.