Catalytic self-assembled monolayers on Au nanoparticles: The source of catalysis of a transphosphorylation reaction

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 4879-4889

  Zaupa, Giovanni ^a   Mora, Claudia ^a   Bonomi, Renato ^a   Prins, Leonard J ^a   Scrimin, Paolo ^a  

^a INSTITUTE ON MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

gold; monolayers; nanoparticles; self assembly; supported catalysts; transphosphorylation

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; BINDING SITES; CATALYST ACTIVITY; CATALYST SUPPORTS; GOLD; GOLD NANOPARTICLES; MONOLAYERS; NANOCATALYSTS; NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC POLYMERS; SELF ASSEMBLY;

BINDING AFFINITIES; CATALYTIC EFFICIENCIES; CO-OPERATIVE EFFECTS; CONTROL EXPERIMENTS; INTRINSIC PROPERTY; RANDOM DISTRIBUTION; TRANSPHOSPHORYLATION; TRIAZACYCLONONANE;

SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS;

EID: 79953885125     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002590     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. R. A. Sheldon, I. Arends, U. Hanefeld, Green Chemistry and Catalysis, 1 st ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007.
2. A. Thomas, M. Driess, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 1922-1924
3. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1890-1892.
4. F. M. deRege, D. K. Morita, K. C. Ott, W. Tumas, R. D. Broene, Chem. Commun. 2000, 1797-1798.
5. C. Bianchini, P. Barbaro, V. Dal Santo, R. Gobetto, A. Meli, W. Oberhauser, R. Psaro, F. Vizza, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 41-45.
6. R. Margalef-Catalã, C. Claver, P. Salagre, E. Fernández, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1469-1476.
7. M. J. Alcõn, A. Corma, M. Iglesias, F. Sánchez, J. Mol. Catal. A 1999, 144, 337-346.
8. P. Barbaro, F. Liguori, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 515-529.
9. I. Yosef, R. Abu-Reziq, D. Avnir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11880-11882.
10. M. Bartz, J. Kuther, R. Seshadri, W. Tremel, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2646-2649
11. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2466-2468.
12. M. C. Daniel, D. Astruc, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293-346.
13. S. Roy, M. A. Pericas, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 2669-2677.
14. T. Belser, M. Stohr, A. Pfaltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8720-8731.
15. H. M. R. Gardimalla, D. Mandal, P. D. Stevens, M. Yen, Y. Gao, Chem. Commun. 2005, 4432-4434.
16. A. G. Hu, G. T. Yee, W. B. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12486-12487.
17. F. Manea, F. B. Houillon, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6291-6295
18. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6165-6169.
19. P. Pengo, S. Polizzi, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1616-1617.
20. R. Bonomi, F. Selvestrel, V. Lombardo, C. Sissi, S. Polizzi, F. Mancin, U. Tonellato, P. Scrimin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15744.
21. T. Belser, E. N. Jacobsen, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 967-971.
22. P. Scrimin, G. Ghirlanda, P. Tecilla, R. A. Moss, Langmuir 1996, 12, 6235-6241.
23. P. Scrimin, P. Tecilla, U. Tonellato, C. A. Bunton, Colloids Surfaces A. 1998, 144, 71-79.
24. C. A. Bunton, P. Scrimin, P. Tecilla, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 419-425.
25. J. M. J. Frechet, Science 1994, 263, 1710-1715.
26. L. Ropartz, R. E. Morris, D. F. Foster, D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun. 2001, 361-362.
27. A. Dahan, M. Portnoy, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1197-1200.
28. Y. Ribourdouille, G. D. Engel, M. Richard-Plouet, L. H. Gade, Chem. Commun. 2003, 1228-1229.
29. E. Delort, T. Darbre, J. L. Reymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15642-15643.
30. C. C. Paluti, E. S. Gawalt, J. Catal. 2009, 267, 105-113.
31. A. M. Jackson, J. W. Myerson, F. Stellacci, Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 330-336.
32. L. Duchesne, G. Wells, D. G. Fernig, S. A. Harris, R. Levy, ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 2127-2134.
33. C. Gentilini, P. Franchi, E. Mileo, S. Polizzi, M. Lucarini, L. Pasquato, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 3106-3110
34. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3060-3064.
35. C. Gentilini, L. Pasquato, J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 1403-1412.
36. F. Manea, C. Bindoli, S. Polizzi, L. Lay, P. Scrimin, Langmuir 2008, 24, 4120-4124.
37. N. R. Jana, X. G. Peng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14280-14281.
38. A. C. Templeton, M. J. Hostetler, E. K. Warmoth, S. W. Chen, C. M. Hartshorn, V. M. Krishnamurthy, M. D. E. Forbes, R. W. Murray, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4845-4849.
39. M. J. Hostetler, A. C. Templeton, R. W. Murray, Langmuir 1999, 15, 3782-3789.
40. L. Pasquato, F. Rancan, P. Scrimin, F. Mancin, C. Frigeri, Chem. Commun. 2000, 2253-2254.
41. R. Shenhar, V. M. Rotello, Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 549-561.
42. R. Klajn, K. J. M. Bishop, B. A. Grzybowski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10305-10309.
43. P. Pengo, S. Polizzi, M. Battagliarin, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 2471-2478.
44. A. Scarso, G. Zaupa, F. B. Houillon, L. J. Prins, P. Scrimin, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 376-385.
45. M. Martin, F. Manea, R. Fiammengo, L. J. Prins, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6982-6983.
46. G. Zaupa, P. Scrimin, L. J. Prins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5699-5709.
47. G. Zaupa, L. J. Prins, P. Scrimin, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3816-3820.
48. T. Darbre, J. L. Reymond, Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 925-934.
49. P. Pengo, L. Baltzer, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 404-408
50. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 400-404.
51. R. Breinbauer, E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3750-3753
52. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3604-3607.
53. D. H. Wu, A. D. Chen, C. S. Johnson, J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1995, 115, 260-264.
54. The use of large gradient pulses in diffusion-ordered 2D NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) results in the induction of eddy currents in the metal structures of the magnet and probe, which causes a distortion in the high-resolution spectra. The LEDbp sequence reduces that problem by using bipolar pulse pairs, since the eddy currents caused by two gradient pulses with identical areas, but different polarities tend to cancel.
55. D. M. Brown, D. A. Usher, J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 6558-6564.
56. II]=0 is an experimental point.
57. Under the experimental conditions thiol exchange between the nanoparticle is much slower than the kinetic process studied; see:, M. Zachary, V. Chechik, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 3368-3371
58. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3304-3307.
59. G. Q. Feng, D. Natale, R. Prabaharan, J. C. Mareque-Rivas, N. H. Williams, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7214-7217
60. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7056-7059.
61. F. Avenier, J. B. Domingos, L. D. VanVliet, F. Hollfelder, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7611-7619.
62. F. Mancin, P. Scrimin, P. Tecilla, U. Tonellato, Chem. Commun. 2005, 2540-2548.
63. Simulations using a dodecahedron (12 faces) or icosahedron (20 faces) gave essentially identical results (data not shown). This indicates that, at least from a theoretical point of view, the polydispersity of the nanoparticles is less relevant. This originates from the fact that the catalytic site is composed of only 12 units, which is far less than the total number of thiols present in the monolayer. Experimentally, polydispersity may cause a different spacing between two catalytic units, resulting in different efficiency. However, the similarity of the catalytic parameters of the nanoparticles presented here ((1.6±0.2)nm) and those of a previous study ((2.5±0. 7)nm, ref.[15]) indicate that polydispersity does not appear to play an important role. For that reason, and also considering the relative narrow size distribution of the nanoparticles here, polydispersity was not taken into account in the analysis.
64. S. L. Regen, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 729-735.
65. S. M. K. Davidson, S. L. Regen, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1269-1279.
66. R. Bonomi, A. Cazzolaro, L. J. Prins, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 445-447.
67. A. Scarso, U. Scheffer, M. Gobel, Q. B. Broxterman, B. Kaptein, F. Formaggio, C. Toniolo, P. Scrimin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5144-5149.
68. F. Avenier, F. Hollfelder, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12371-12380.