Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 98-102

  Mawatari, Yoshiro ^a   Kobayashi, Akira ^a   Yokogawa, Hideaki ^a   Sugiyama, Kazuhisa ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

DSAEK; endothelial keratoplasty; intraocular pressure; nDSAEK

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NON DESCEMET STRIPPING AUTOMATED ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PNEUMATONOMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TONOPEN;

AGED; AUTOMATION; CORNEA; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 79953684297     PISSN: 00215155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-010-0916-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17:618-626. (Pubitemid 28511909)
2. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Small-incision deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK): six-month results in the first prospective clinical study. Cornea 2005;24:59-65. (Pubitemid 40053496)
3. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1541-1548.
4. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1936-1942. (Pubitemid 44635703)
5. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:411-418.
6. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25:886-889. (Pubitemid 44763845)
7. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:543-549.
8. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy findings after non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1306-1313.
9. Miyake K, Matsuda M, Inaba M. Corneal endothelial changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:49-52. (Pubitemid 19177058)
10. Kobayashi A, Mawatari Y, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:977-985.
11. Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:837-840. (Pubitemid 44869687)
12. Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:115-119. (Pubitemid 43790806)
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
14. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, et al. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:780-786.
15. Price MO, Price FW Jr, Trespalacios R. Endothelial keratoplasty technique for aniridic aphakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:376-379. (Pubitemid 46281550)
16. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft. Cornea 2006;25:895-899. (Pubitemid 44763847)
17. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement - comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006;15:2-6. (Pubitemid 43068411)
18. Herdener S, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1027-1030. (Pubitemid 46979540)
19. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wider range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 2005;14:288-292. (Pubitemid 41023013)
20. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai M, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 2007;114:20-26. (Pubitemid 46014299)
21. Martinez JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2156-2162. (Pubitemid 44838915)
22. Barleon L, Hoffman EM, Berres M, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:583-590. (Pubitemid 44442067)
23. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1532-1537. (Pubitemid 41626689)
24. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African-American subjects. Ophthalmology 2007;114:658-665. (Pubitemid 46483675)
25. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P. Comparisons between PASCAL dynamic tonometry, the tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:272-279. (Pubitemid 46711364)
26. Zadok D, Tran D, Twa M, et al. Pneumotonometric versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1344-1348. (Pubitemid 29458519)