Esthetic and functional consideration in restoring endodontically treated teeth

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 403-410

  Trushkowsky, Richard D ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Endodontics; Post; Restoration

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953321216     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.009     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Bittner N., Hill T., Randi A. Evaluation of a one-piece milled zirconia post and core with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2010, 103(6):369-379.
2. Azer S.S., Ayash G.M., Johnston W.M., et al. Effect of esthetic core shades on the final color of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2006, 96(6):397-401.
3. Zalkind M., Hochman N. Esthetic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 79(6):702-705.
4. Carossa S., Lombardo S., Pera P., et al. Influence of posts and cores on light transmission through different all-ceramic crowns: spectrophotometric and clinical evaluation. Int J Prosthodont 2001, 14(1):9-14.
5. Deger S., Akgüngör G., Caniklioglu B. An alternative method for fabricating a custom-made metal post with a ceramic core. Dent Traumatol 2005, 21(3):179-182.
6. Vichi A., Ferrari M., Davidson C.L. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000, 83(4):412-417.
7. Nakamura T., Saito O., Fuyikawa j., et al. Influence of abutment substrate and ceramic thickness on the colour of heat-pressed ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2002, 29(9):805-809.
8. Michalakis K.X., Hirayama H., Sfolkos J., et al. Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004, 24(5):462-469.
9. de Rouffignac M., de Cooman J. Aesthetic all-porcelain anterior restorations. Pract Periodonics Aesthet Dent 1992, 4(8):9-13.
10. Morgano S.M., Rodrigues A.H., Sabrosa C.E. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 2004, 48(2):397-416.
11. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth; post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005, 136(5):611-619.
12. Signore A., Bendicenti S., Kaitsas V., et al. Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts or full-ceramic crown coverage. J Dent 2009, 37(2):115-121.
13. Sorensen J.A., Martinoff J.T. Edodontically treated teeth as abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1985, 53(5):631-636.
14. Theodosopoulou J.N., Chochlidakis K.M. A systematic review of dowel (post) and core materials. J Prosthodont 2009, 18(6):464-472.
15. Peroz I., Blankenstein F., Lange K.P., et al. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with post and cores: a review. Quintessence Int 2005, 36(9):737-746.
16. Dietschi D., Duc O., Krejci I., et al. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature. Part I. Composition and micro and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int 2007, 38(9):733-743.
17. Meyenberg K.H., Lüthy H., Schärer P. Zirconia posts a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995, 7(2):73-80.
18. Stricker E.J., Göhring T.N. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in-vitro study. J Dent 2006, 34(5):326-335.
19. Bakke M., Holm B., Jensen B.L., et al. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68 year old women and men related top occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res 1990, 98(2):148-158.
20. Morgano S.M., Brackett S.E. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 82(6):643-657.
21. Borracchini A., Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent 2005, 7(30):235-240.
22. Ferrai M., Vichi A., Mannocci F., et al. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000, 13(Spec No):9B-13B.
23. Al-Tayyan M.H., Watts D.C., Kurer H.G., et al. Is a " flexible" glass-bundle dowel system as retentive as a " rigid" quartz fiber dowel system?. J Prosthodont 2008, 17(7):532-537.
24. Grinding S., Goracci C., Monticelli F., et al. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three point bearing test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 2005, 21(2):75-82.
25. Seefield F., Wentz H.J., Ludwig K., et al. Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems. Dent Mater 2007, 23(3):265-271.
26. D'Arcangelo C., Zazzeroni S., D'Amario M., et al. Bond strength of three types of fibre-reinforced post systems in various regions of root canals. Int Endod J 2008, 41(4):322-328.
27. Zicari F., Couthino E., De Munck J.H., et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008, 24(7):967-977.
28. Vichi A., Mannocci F., Mason P.N. Retrospective study of clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000, 13(Spec No):9B-13B.
29. Kern M., Thompson V.P. Sandblasting and silica coating of glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic; volume loss, morphology, and changes in surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994, 71(5):453-461.
30. Balbosh A., Kjern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 2006, 95(3):218-223.
31. Mazzitelli C., Monticelli F. Evaluation of the push-out bond strength of self-adhesive resin to fiber posts. International Dentistry SA 2009, 11(6):54-60.
32. Radovic I., Monticelli F., Goracci C., et al. Self adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008, 10(4):251-258.
33. LeBellk A.M., Tanner J., Lassila L.V., et al. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prothodont 2003, 16(4):403-408.
34. Faria e Silva A.L., Arias V.G., Soares L.E., et al. Influence of fiber-post translucency on the degree of conversion of a dual-cured resin cement. J Endod 2007, 33(3):303-305.
35. Roberts H.W., Leonard D.L., Vanderwalle K.S., et al. The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure. Dent Mater 2004, 20(7):617-622.
36. Yoldas O., Alaçam T. Microhardness of composites in simulated root canals cured with light transmitting posts and glass-fiber reinforced composite posts. J Endod 2005, 31(2):104-106.
37. Teixeira E.C., Teixeira F.B., Piasick J.R., et al. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2006, 137(7):1006-1012.
38. Braga R.R., Cesar P.F., Gonzaga C.C. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 2002, 29(3):257-262.
39. El-Badrawy W.A., El-Mowafy O.M. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995, 73(6):515-524.
40. Tanoue N., Koishi Y., Atsuta M., et al. Properties of dual-curable luting composites polymerized with single and dual curing modes. J Oral Rehabil 2003, 30(10):1015-1021.
41. Aksornmuang J., Nakajima M., Panyayong W., et al. Effects of photocuring strategy on bonding of dual-cure one step self-etch adhesive to root canal dentin. Dent Mater J 2009, 28(2):133-141.
42. Ferrari M., Mannocci F., Vichi A., et al. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000, 13(5):255-260.
43. Mjor I.A., Smith M.R., Ferrari M., et al. The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int Endod J 2009, 34(5):346-353.
44. Mannocci F., Pilecki P., Bertelli E., et al. Density of dentinal tubules affects the tensile strength of root dentin. Dent Mater 2004, 20(30):293-296.
45. Breschi L., Mazzoni A., Ferrari M. Adhesion to intra-radicular dentin. Fiber posts and endodontically treated teeth: a compendium of scientific and clinical perspectives 2008, 15-37. Modern Dentistry Media, Wendywood (SA). M. Ferrari, L. Breschi, S. Grandini (Eds.).
46. Goracci C., Sadek F.T., Fabianelli A., et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005, 30(5):627-635.
47. Boone K.J., Murchison D.F., Schindler W.G., et al. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. J Endod 2001, 27(12):768-771.
48. Coniglio I., Magni E., Goracci C., et al. Post space cleaning using a new nickel titanium endodontic drill combined with different cleaning regimens. J Endod 2008, 34(1):83-86.
49. Feilzer A.J., DeGee A.J., Davidson C.L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987, 66(11):1636-1639.
50. Tay F.R., Loushine R.J., Lambrechts P., et al. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005, 31(8):584-589.
51. Goracci C., Fabianelli A., Sadek F.T., et al. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005, 31(8):608-612.
52. Bouillaguet S., Troesch S., Wataha J.C., et al. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003, 19(3):199-205.
53. Hayashi M., Sugeta A., Takahashi Y., et al. Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores. Dent Mater 2008, 24(9):1178-1186.