Post Space Cleaning Using a New Nickel Titanium Endodontic Drill Combined with Different Cleaning Regimens

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 83-86

  Coniglio, Ivanovic ^a   Magni, Elisa ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Radovic, Ivana ^a,b   Carvalho, Carlos Augusto ^a,c   Grandini, Simone ^a   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Debridement; gutta percha removal; irrigant regimens; post space

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; EDETIC ACID; NICKEL; PHOSPHORIC ACID; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; EDETIC ACID; HUMANS; NICKEL; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; ULTRASONIC THERAPY; WATER;

EID: 37349081300     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gordon M.P. The removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealers from root canals. N Z Dent J 101 (2005) 44-52
2. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 136 (2005) 611-619
3. Shahravan A., Haghdoost A.A., Adl A., Rahimi H., and Shadifar F. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Endod 33 (2007) 96-105
4. Kokkas A.B., Boutsioukis A.Ch., Vassiliadis L.P., and Stavrianos C.K. The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: an in vitro study. J Endod 30 (2004) 100-102
5. Kouvas V., Liolios E., Vassiliadis L., Parissis-Messimeris S., and Boutsioukis A. Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study. Endod Dent Traumatol 14 (1998) 191-195
6. Berutti E., Orsi M.V., and Grandini S. Il trattamento endodontico. In: Ferrari M., and Scotti R. (Eds). I perni in fibra. Presupposti teorici e applicazioni cliniche. I edizione (2002), Edizioni Elsevier Masson, Milano, Italy
7. Saad A.Y., Al-Hadlaq S.M., and Al-Katheeri N.H. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retreatment. J Endod 33 (2007) 38-41
8. Baratto Filho F., Ferreira E.L., and Fariniuk L.F. Efficiency of the 0.04 taper ProFile during the re-treatment of gutta-percha-filled root canals. Int Endod J 35 (2002) 651-654
9. Betti L.V., and Bramante C.M. Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 514-519
10. Ferreira J.J., Rhodes J.S., and Ford T.R. The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 267-274
11. Valois C.R., Navarro M., Ramos A.A., de Castro A.J., and Gahyva S.M. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment. Braz Dent J 12 (2001) 95-99
12. Bramante C.M., and Betti L.V. Efficacy of Quantec rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal. Int Endod J 33 (2000) 463-467
13. Schirrmeister J.F., Wrbas K.T., Meyer K.M., Altenburger M.J., and Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 32 (2006) 469-472
14. Schirrmeister J.F., Wrbas K.T., Schneider F.H., Altenburger M.J., and Hellwig E. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101 (2006) 542-547
15. Kosti E., Lambrianidis T., Economides N., and Neofitou C. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 48-54
16. Hulsmann M., and Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 468-476
17. Albrecht L.J., Baumgartner J.C., and Marshall J.G. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 30 (2004) 425-428
18. Zmener O., Pameijer C.H., and Banegas G. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 521-526
19. Perez-Heredia M., Ferrer-Luque C.M., and Gonzalez-Rodriguez M.P. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod 32 (2006) 993-997
20. Plotino G., Pameijer C.H., Grande N.M., and Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 33 (2007) 81-95
21. Guerisoli D.M., Marchesan M.A., Walmsley A.D., Lumley P.J., and Pecora J.D. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J 35 (2002) 418-421
22. Hata G., Hayami S., Weine F.S., and Toda T. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 308-317
23. Lee S.J., Wu M.K., and Wesselink P.R. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 672-678
24. Ari H., Erdemir A., and Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod 30 (2004) 792-795
25. van der Sluis L.W., Gambarini G., Wu M.K., and Wesselink P.R. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 472-476
26. Lui J.N., Kuah H.G., and Chen N.N. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer. J Endod 33 (2007) 472-475
27. Takeda F.H., Harashima T., Kimura Y., and Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J 32 (1999) 32-39
28. Kaplowitz G.J. Removing gutta-percha for dowel space preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 135 (2004) 330
29. Serafino C., Gallina G., Cumbo E., Monticelli F., Goracci C., and Ferrari M. Ultrasound effects after post space preparation: an SEM study. J Endod 32 (2006) 549-552
30. Serafino C., Gallina G., Cumbo E., and Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97 (2004) 381-387
31. Schwartz R.S. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system-the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod 32 (2006) 1125-1134
32. Jeon I.S., Spangberg L.S., Yoon T.C., Kazemi R.B., and Kum K.Y. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 (2003) 601-607
33. O'Connell M.S., Morgan L.A., Beeler W.J., and Baumgartner J.C. A comparative study of smear layer removal usind different salts of EDTA. J Endod 26 (2000) 739-743