Corrigendum to "Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency" [Journal of Memory and Language 59 (2008) 331-345] (DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.002);Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 331-345

  Criss, Amy H ^a   Malmberg, Kenneth J ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic memory; Memory models; Object memory; Orthography; Word frequency effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 50849144027     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (83)

1. Adelman J.S., and Brown G.D.A. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2007) 455-459
2. Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (1991), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
3. Andrews S. Neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 18 (1992) 234-254
4. Andrews S. The role of orthographic similarity in lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 (1997) 439-461
5. Atkinson R.C., and Shiffrin R.M. Human memory: A proposed systems and its control processes. In: Spence W.E., and Spence J.T. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation (1968), Academic, New York 742-775
6. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., and Gulikers L. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium (1995), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
7. Balakrishnan J.D., and Ratcliff R. Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 615-633
8. Besner D., and McCann R.S. Word frequency effects and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention and performance. XII: The psychology of reading (1987), Erlbaum, New Jersey 201-219
9. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147
10. Bjork R.A. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: Metcalfe J., and Shimamura A.P. (Eds). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (1994), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 185-205
11. Borowsky R., and Besner D. Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 813-840
12. Brown J. Recall and recognition (1976), John Wiley Sons, New York
13. Cortese M.J., Watson J.M., Wang J., and Fugett A. Relating distinctive orthographic and phonological processes to episodic memory performance. Memory & Cognition 32 (2004) 632-639
14. Craik F.I.M., and Tulving E. Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (1975) 268-294
15. Criss A.H. The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language 55 (2006) 461-478
16. Criss A.H., and McClelland J.L. Differentiating the differentiation models: A comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM). Journal of Memory and Language 55 (2006) 447-460
17. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. Interactions between study task, study time, and the low frequency HR advantage in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 778-786
18. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis & Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review 111 (2004) 800-807
19. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 32 (2004) 1284-1297
20. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. List discrimination and representation in associative recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 1199-1212
21. Dennis S., and Humphreys M.S. A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 452-478
22. Diana R.A., and Reder L.M. The low frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (2006) 805-815
23. Estes W.K., and Maddox W.T. Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 1075-1095
24. Estes W.K., and Maddox W.T. On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects on recognition of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 1003-1018
25. Forster K.I.F., and Chambers S.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 627-635
26. Gernsbacher M.A. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 256-281
27. Gillund G., and Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 1-67
28. Glanc G.A., and Greene R.L. Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 35 (2007) 365-371
29. Glanzer M., and Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 12 (1985) 8-20
30. Glanzer M., and Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory: Theory and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990) 5-16
31. Guttentag R.E., and Carrol D. Recollection-based recognition: Word-frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 502-516
32. Hayward W.G., and Tarr M.J. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1511-1521
33. Heathcote A., Ditton E., and Mitchell K. Word-frequency and word-likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 34 (2006) 826-838
34. Hintzman D.L. On explaining the mirror effect. Memory & Cognition 20 (1994) 201-205
35. Hirshman E., and Arndt J. Discriminating alternative explanations of false recognition: The case of word concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 1306-1323
36. Hirshman E., Fisher J., Henthorn T., Arndt J., and Passannante A. Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 499-516
37. Hirshman E., and Mulligan N. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory, but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 17 (1991) 507-513
38. Hirshman E., Trembath D., and Mulligan N. Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 20 (1994) 608-620
39. Hummel J.E., and Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 480-517
40. Hunt R.R., and Elliott J.M. The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 49-74
41. Kucera H., and Francis W. Computational analysis of present-day American English (1967), Brown University Press, Providence, RI
42. Landauer T.K., and Streeter L.A. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973) 119-131
43. Lockhart R.S., Craik F.I.M., and Jacoby L. Depth of processing, recognition, and recall. In: Brown J. (Ed). Recall and recognition (1976), Wiley, NY 75-102
44. Malmberg K.J., Holden J., and Shiffrin R.M. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 319-331
45. Malmberg K.J., and Murnane K. List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 616-630
46. Malmberg K.J., and Nelson T.O. The word-frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 35-43
47. Malmberg K.J., Steyvers M., Stephens J.D., and Shiffrin R.M. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 30 (2002) 607-613
48. Mandler G., Goodman G.O., and Wilkes-Gibb D.L. The word-frequency paradox in recognition. Memory & Cognition 10 (1982) 33-42
49. Martin A., and Wiggs C.L. Modulation of human medial temporal lobe activity by form, meaning, and experience. Hippocampus 7 (1997) 587-593
50. McClelland J.L., and Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 724-760
51. Miozzo M., and Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2003) 228-258
52. Mulatti C., Reynolds M., and Besner D. Neighbourhood effects in visual word recognition: New findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 799-810
53. Mulligan N.W. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests. Memory & Cognition 28 (2000) 539-546
54. Murdock B. The mirror effect and the spacing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 570-588
55. Naveh-Benjamin M., Craik F.I.M., Guez Y., and Dori H. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (1998) 1091-1104
56. Naveh-Benjamin M., and Guez Y. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (2000) 1461-1482
57. Nelson D.L. Remembering pictures and words: Appearance significance and name. In: Cermak L., and Craik F.I.M. (Eds). Levels of processing and human memory (1979), L. Erlbaum & Associates, New Jersey 45-76
58. Nelson D.L., and Brooks D.H. Functional independence of pictures and their verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1973) 44-48
59. Nelson T.O., and Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower G. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (1990), Academic Press, New York 125-173
60. Nelson D.L., Reed V.S., and McEvoy C.L. Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3 (1977) 485-497
61. Nelson D.L., Reed V.S., and Walling J.R. Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2 (1976) 523-528
62. Norris D. The Bayesian Reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 327-357
63. Paivio A. Imagery and verbal processes (1971), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
64. Perea M., and Rosa E. Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (2000) 668-677
65. Pexman P.M., Hino Y., and Lupker S.J. Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30 (2004) 1252-1270
66. Poggio T., and Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343 (1990) 263-266
67. Pollatsek A., Perea M., and Binder K. The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1142-1158
68. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., and Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 294-320
69. Reder L.M., Paynter C., Diana R.A., Ngiam J., and Dickison D. Experience is a double-edged sword: A computational model of the encoding/retrieval tradeoff with familiarity. In: Ross B., and Benjamin A.S. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation (2008), Academic Press 271-312
70. Scarborough D.L., Cortese C., and Scarborough H.S. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 1-17
71. Schulman A.I. Word length and rarity in recognition memory. Psychonomic Science 9 (1967) 211-212
72. Sears C.R., Campbell C.R., and Lupker S.J. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1040-1062
73. Serra M., and Nairne J.S. Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition 21 (1993) 34-40
74. Shepard R.N. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6 (1967) 156-163
75. Shiffrin R.M., and Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 (1997) 145-166
76. Slamecka N.J., and Graf P. The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (1978) 592-604
77. Snodgrass J.G., and Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (1980) 174-215
78. Snodgrass J.G., and Yuditsky T. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28 (1996) 516-536
79. Steyvers M., and Malmberg K. The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29 (2003) 760-766
80. Underwood B.J. Attributes of memory. Psychological Review 76 (1969) 559-573
81. Westerman D.L., and Greene R.L. The effects of visual masking on recognition: Similarities to the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 584-596
82. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 441-517
83. Zechmeister E. Orthographic distinctiveness as a variable in word recognition. American Journal of Psychology 85 (1972) 425-430