In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: Results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT)

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 881-893

  Bousson, Valérie Danielle ^a,b   Adams, Judith ^c   Engelke, Klaus ^d   Aout, Mounir ^a   Cohen Solal, Martine ^a   Bergot, Catherine ^b   Haguenauer, Didier ^e   Goldberg, Daniele ^f   Champion, Karine ^a   Aksouh, Redha ^a   Vicaut, Eric ^a   Laredo, Jean Denis ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^e Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines University   (France)

^f Centre Médico Chirurgical De La Porte De Pantin   (France)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density (BMD); cortical bone; hip fracture; osteoporosis; quantitative computed tomography (QCT)

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORTICAL BONE; DENSITOMETRY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK; THICKNESS; TRABECULAR BONE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79953061015     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.270     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ III., Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002; 359: 1761-1767.
2. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Fini M, Giardino R, Giavaresi G,. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13: 69-73. (Pubitemid 34157833)
3. Duboeuf F, Hans D, Schott AM, et al. Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: the EPIDOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12: 1895-1902. (Pubitemid 27500201)
4. Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, et al. Survival and functional outcome according to hip fracture type: a one-year prospective cohort study in elderly women with an intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture. Bone. 2007; 41: 958-964. (Pubitemid 350119866)
5. Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C, et al. Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 2007; 298: 2389-2398. (Pubitemid 350190780)
6. Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, et al. An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2001; 12: 519-528. (Pubitemid 32777427)
7. Johansson H, Kanis J, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E,. BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteop Int. 2009; 20: 1675-1682.
8. Kanis J, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E,. FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone. 2009; 44: 734-743.
9. Kanis JA,. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. The Lancet. 2002; 359: 1929-1936. (Pubitemid 34615775)
10. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, et al. on behalf of the national Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas. 2009; 62: 105-108.
11. 2006. Dachverband der deutschsprachigen wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften für Osteologie (DVO), Osteoporose-Leitlinie. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart.
12. Augat P, Schorlemmer S,. The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age and Ageing. 2006; 35-S2: ii27-ii31. (Pubitemid 44687506)
13. Burr DB,. Bone quality: understanding what matters. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact. 2004; 4: 184-186. (Pubitemid 38877772)
14. Bousson V, Le Bras A, Roqueplan F, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationship linking geometric and densitometric parameters to bone strength. Role for compact bone. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17: 855-864. (Pubitemid 43781499)
15. Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone. 1997; 21: 101-108. (Pubitemid 27341746)
16. Lochmüller EM, Müller R, Kuhn V, Lill CA, Eckstein F,. Can novel clinical densitometric techniques replace or improve DXA in predicting bone strength in osteoporosis at the hip and other skeletal sites? J Bone Miner Res. 2003; 18: 906-912. (Pubitemid 37294975)
17. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. group Soofr Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet. 1993; 341: 72-75. (Pubitemid 23028113)
18. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H,. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Brit Med J. 1996; 312: 1254-1259. (Pubitemid 26147662)
19. Cooper C,. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteop Int Suppl. 1999; 2: S2-S8. (Pubitemid 29231749)
20. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11: 707-730. (Pubitemid 26172795)
21. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Robb RA, et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19: 1945-1954. (Pubitemid 41103408)
22. Sato M, Westmore M, Ma YL, et al. Teriparatide [PTH(1-34)] strengthens the proximal femur of ovariectomized nonhuman primates despite increasing porosity. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19: 623-629. (Pubitemid 41071223)
23. Bouxsein ML,. Biomechanics of age-related fractures. In:, Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2001, pp 509-534.
24. Bell KL, Loveridge N, Power J, et al. Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: Cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14: 111-119. (Pubitemid 29021610)
25. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, et al. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet. 2005; 366: 129-135. (Pubitemid 40991213)
26. Werner C, Iversen BF, Therkildsen MHS,. Contribution of the trabecular component to mechanical strength and bone mineral content of the femoral neck. An experimental study on cadaver bones. J Clin Lab Invest. 1988; 48: 457-460.
27. Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC,. Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 4: 252-261.
28. Bouxsein ML, Fajardo RJ,. Re. Cortical stability of the femoral neck and hip fracture risk. Lancet. 2005; 366: 1524.
29. Holzer G, von Skrbensky G, Holzer LA, Pichl W,. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24: 468-4674.
30. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jamsa T,. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 274-280. (Pubitemid 38543945)
31. Cheng XG, Li J, Lu Y, Keyak JH, Lang T,. Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with hip fracture. Bone. 2007; 40: 169-174. (Pubitemid 44839321)
32. Cody DD, Divine GW, Nahigian K, Kleerekoper M,. Bone density distribution and gender dominate femoral neck fracture risk predictors. Skeletal Radiol. 2000; 29: 151-161. (Pubitemid 30197920)
33. Lewiecki EM, Keaveny TM, Kopperdahl DL, et al. Once-monthly oral ibandronate improves biomechanical determinants of bone strength in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94: 171-180.
34. Engelke K, Langner O, Deac P, Bousson V, Laredo JD, Kalender W,. 2006. Radiation exposure in 3D QCT of the hip: Comparison of simulations with in-vitro investigations. Results from the EFFECT study 15th International Bone Densitometry Workshop, Kyoto, Jpn.
35. Kang Y, Engelke K, Fuchs C, Kalender WA,. An anatomic coordinate system of the femoral neck for highly reproducible BMD measurements using 3D QCT. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 2005; 29: 533-541. (Pubitemid 41606726)
36. Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender WA,. A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22: 586-598.
37. Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender WA,. Interactive 3D editing tools for image segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2004; 8: 35-46. (Pubitemid 38016531)
38. Engelke K, Bousson V, Laredo JD, Skalli W, Adams J, Kalender W,. 2006. A new semi-anthropometric phantom for QCT and DXA of the hip-The European Proximal Femur Phantom (EPFP). Results from the EFFECT study 15th International Bone Densitometry Workshop, Kyoto, JPN.
39. Efron B,. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics. 1979; 7: 1-26.
40. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44: 837-845.
41. Augat P, Reeb H, Claes LE,. Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11: 1356-1363. (Pubitemid 26282537)
42. Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, et al. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone. 1997; 20: 213-218. (Pubitemid 27141832)
43. Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G, Manatunga AK, Timmerman L, Johnston CC,. Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density geometry and architecture. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 5: 167-173.
44. Burr DB,. Bone material properties and mineral matrix contributions to fracture risk or age in women and men. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact. 2002; 2: 201-204. (Pubitemid 34223802)
45. Li W, Kornak J, Harris T, et al. Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping. Bone. 2009; 44: 596-602.
46. Li W, Kezele I, Collins L, et al. Voxel-based modeling and quantification of the proximal femur using inter-subject registration of quantitative CT images. Bone. 2007; 41: 888-895. (Pubitemid 47576832)
47. Pulkkinen P, Jämsa T, Lochmüller E-M, Kuhn V, Nieminen MT, Eckstein F,. Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19: 547-558.
48. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Sebert JL,. Effect of age and sex on the ratio of cervical to trochanteric hip fracture. A metaanalyse of 16 reports on 36451 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 64: 647-653. (Pubitemid 24032255)
49. Löfman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, Toss G,. Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types. Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13: 18-25. (Pubitemid 34157827)
50. Pulkkinen P, Eckstein F, Lochmüller E-M, Kuhn V, Jämsä T,. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs trochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21: 895-901. (Pubitemid 43787996)
51. Mautalen CA, Vega EM, Einhorn TA,. Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? Bone. 1996; 18: 133S-137S. (Pubitemid 126352521)
52. Black DM, Bouxsein ML, Marshall LM, et al. Group OFiMMR Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 1326-1333. (Pubitemid 352040188)
53. Davison KS, Siminoski K, Adachi JD, et al. Bone strength: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 36: 22-31. (Pubitemid 44144501)
54. Engelke K, Adams J, Armbrecht G, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: th. 2007; 2008; ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 11: 123-162.
55. Moreland JD, Richardson JA, Goldsmith CH, Clase CM,. Muscle weakness and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52: 1121-1129. (Pubitemid 38869071)
56. Lang T, Koyama A, Li C, et al. Pelvic body composition measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with recent hip fracture. Bone. 2008; 42: 798-805.
57. Engelke K, Bousson V, Laredo J, Skalli W, Adams J, Kalender W,. 2006. A new semi-anthropometric phantom for QCT and DXA of the hip-The European Proximal Femur Phantom (EPFP). Results from the EFFECT study 15th International Bone Densitometry Workshop, Kyoto, Jpn.
58. June 2009 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of hip fracture in older people.
59. Keaveny TM, Bouxsein ML,. Theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 1541-1547.
60. Pinilla TP, Boardman KC, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER, Hayes WC,. Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996; 58: 231-235. (Pubitemid 26097904)
61. Hangartner TN, Gilsanz V,. Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11: 1518-1525. (Pubitemid 26331007)
62. Prevrhal S, Fox JC, Shepherd JA, Genant HK,. Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 1-8. (Pubitemid 36106000)