Clinical and radiographic outcomes of image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: An Evidence-Based evaluation

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 15-20

  Cheng, Tao ^a   Zhang, Gouyou ^b,c   Zhang, Xianlong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

computer assisted surgery; meta analysis; navigation; systematic review; total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMUR; HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY KNEE SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE SOCIETY RATING SYSTEM; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952961625     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350610382012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J., Cheney NA Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 ; 467: 1450-1457.
2. Horwitz MD, Awan S., Chatoo MB, Stott DJ, Powles DP An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 111-115.
3. Parsch D., Krüger M., Moser MT, Geiger F. Follow-up of 11-16 years after modular fixed-bearing TKA. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 431-435.
4. Ang DC, Tahir N., Hanif H., Tong Y., Ibrahim SA African Americans and Whites are equally appropriate to be considered for total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2009 ; 36: 1971-1976.
5. Kashyap SN, Van Ommeren JW, Shankar S. Minimally invasive surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty: a learning curve. Surg Innov. 2009 ; 16: 55-62.
6. Erak S., Rajgopal V., Macdonald SJ, McCalden RW, Bourne RB Ten-year results of an inset biconvex patella prosthesis in primary knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 ; 467: 1781-1792.
7. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 ; 356: 144-153. (Pubitemid 29019483)
8. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 ; 73: 709-714.
9. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 ; 299: 31-43. (Pubitemid 24051697)
10. Czurda T., Fennema P., Baumgartner M., Ritschl P. The association between component malalignment and postoperative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results of a cohort/nested case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 ; 18: 863-869.
11. Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes MJ, Nicolai P., Aldam CH, Allen PW The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001 ; 16: 635-640. (Pubitemid 32751451)
12. Petersen TL, Engh GA Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988 ; 3: 67-72.
13. Hernández-Vaquero D., Suarez-Vazquez A., Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 ; 468: 1237-1241.
14. Stiehl JB Comparison of tibial rotation in fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 679-685.
15. van Strien T., van der Linden-van der Zwaag E., Kaptein B., van Erkel A., Valstar E., Nelissen R. Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 1255-1261.
16. Dattani R., Patnaik S., Kantak A., Tselentakis G. Navigation knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 7-10.
17. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D., Kalairajah Y., Field RE Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up ? Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 1567-1570
18. Minoda Y., Kobayashi A., Iwaki H., Ohashi H., Takaoka K. TKA sagittal alignment with navigation systems and conventional techniques vary only a few degrees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 ; 467: 1000-1006.
19. Lubicky JP Levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 ; 88: 1264-1265.
20. Petrisor BA, Keating J., Schemitsch E. Grading the evidence: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Injury. 2006 ; 37: 321-327. (Pubitemid 43363516)
21. Obremskey WT, Pappas N., Attallah-Wasif E., Tornetta P. 3rd, Bhandari M. Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 ; 87: 2632-2638. (Pubitemid 41747029)
22. Böhling U., Schamberger H., Grittner U., Scholz J. Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2005 ; 6: 69-75. (Pubitemid 41038496)
23. Mizu-uchi H., Matsuda S., Miura H., Okazaki K., Akasaki Y., Iwamoto Y. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 ; 90: 1025-1031.
24. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Würstlin S., Holz U. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2003 ; 106: 941-948. (Pubitemid 37444158)
25. Victor J., Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 ; 428: 131-139. (Pubitemid 39506164)
26. Perlick L., Bäthis H., Tingart M., Perlick C., Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 ; 75: 464-470. (Pubitemid 39179534)
27. Zumstein MA, Frauchiger L., Wyss D., Hess R., Ballmer PM Is restricted femoral navigation sufficient for accuracy of total knee arthroplasty ? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 ; 451: 80-86.
28. Mullaji A., Shetty GM Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with extra-articular deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2009 ; 24: 1164-1169.
29. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 ; 299: 153-156. (Pubitemid 24051713)
30. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009 ; 24: 560-569.
31. Longstaff LM, Sloan K., Stamp N., Scaddan M., Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009 ; 24: 570-578.
32. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007 ; 22: 1097-1106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
33. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., Gebhard F., Hanson B., Ekkernkamp A., Stengel D. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 ; 89: 261-269. (Pubitemid 46214342)
34. Martin A., von Strempel A. Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 ; 449: 275-282. (Pubitemid 44231820)
35. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Lüring C., Perlick C., Grifka J. Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004 ; 28: 87-90. (Pubitemid 38543980)