Who participates in household scanning panels?

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 226-240

  Lusk, Jayson L ^a   Brooks, Kathleen ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

best worst; choice experiment; participation bias; sample selection; scanner data

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; SAMPLING BIAS;

EID: 79952938351     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aaq123     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baker, L., T. H. Wagner, S. Singer, and M. K. Bundorf. 2003. Use of the Internet and Email for Health Care Information: Results from a National Survey. Journal of the American Medical Association 289:2400-2406. (Pubitemid 37430173)
2. Bell, D. R., and R. E. Bucklin. 1999. The Role of Internal Reference Points in the Category Purchase Decision. Journal of Consumer Research 26:128-143.
3. Brester, G. W. 1996. Estimation of the U. S. Import Demand Elasticity for Beef: The Importance of Disaggregation. Review of Agricultural Economics 18:31-42.
4. Broda, C., E. Leibtag, and D. E. Weinstein. 2009. The Role of Prices in Measuring the Poor's Living Standards. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23:77-97.
5. Broda, C., and D. E. Weinstein. 2010. Product Creation and Destruction: Evidence and Price Implications. American Economic Review 100:691-723.
6. Brooks, K., and J. L. Lusk. 2010. Stated and Revealed Preferences for Organic and Cloned Milk: Combining Choice Experiment and Scanner Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92:1229-1241.
7. Bucklin, R. E., and S. Gupta. 1999. Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives. Marketing Science 18:247-269.
8. Cameron, T., and J. R. De Shazo. 2004. Sample Selection in a Major Consumer Panel. Presentation to U. S. Office of Management and Budget, Washington DC, December 2.
9. Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2001. Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41:179-192.
10. Carson, R. T., N. E. Flores, and N. F. Meade. 2001. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19:173-210. (Pubitemid 32459257)
11. Chandon, P., V. G. Morwitz, and W. J. Reinartz. 2005. Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research. Journal of Marketing 69:1-14. (Pubitemid 40554515)
12. Chang, L., and J. A. Krosnick. 2002. A Comparison of the Random Digit Dialing Telephone Survey Methodology with Internet Survey Methodology as Implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28, Boston, MA.
13. Chang, J. B., and J. L. Lusk. Mixed Logit Models: Accuracy and Software Choice. Journal of Applied Econometrics. Forthcoming in print. doi: 10.1002/jae.1201.
14. Chang, J. B., J. L. Lusk, and F. B. Norwood. 2009. How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 91:518-534.
15. Cherchi, E., and J. D. Ortúzar. 2008. Empirical Identification in the Mixed Logit Model: Analysing the Effect of Data Richness. Networks and Spatial Economics 8:109-124.
16. Chiou L., and J. L. Walker. 2007. Masking Identification of Discrete Choice Models under Simulation Methods. Journal of Econometrics 141:683-703. (Pubitemid 47503528)
17. Cotterill, R. W. 1994. Scanner Data: New Opportunities for Demand and Competitive Strategy Analysis. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 23:125-139.
18. Dhar, T., and J. D. Foltz. 2005. Milk by Any Other Name. Consumer Benefits from Labeled Milk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87:214-228. (Pubitemid 40273580)
19. Dickson, P. R., and A. G. Sawyer. 1990. The Price of Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers. Journal of Marketing 54:42-54.
20. Einav, L., E. Leibtag, and A. Nevo. 2010. Recording Discrepancies in Nielsen Homescan Data: Are They Present and Do They Matter? Quantitative Marketing and Economics 8:207-239.
21. Foote, J. 2006. How to Join the AC Nielsen Homescan Consumer Panel. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/21910/how-to-join-the-ac-nielsen- homescan.html?page=2&cat=46 (accessed October 30, 2010).
22. Gould, B. W. 1996. Factors Affecting U. S. Demand for Reduced-Fat Fluid Milk. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21:68-81. (Pubitemid 126488012)
23. Griffith, R., E. Leibtag, A. Leicester, and A. Nevo. 2009. Consumer Shopping Behavior: How Much Do Consumers Save? Journal of Economic Perspectives 23:99-120.
24. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47:153-161.
25. Horsky, D., S. Misra, and P. Nelson. 2006. Observed and Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Brand-Choice Models. Marketing Science 25:322-335. (Pubitemid 44259835)
26. Huber, J., W. K. Viscusi, and J. Bell. 2004. The Value of Regional Water Improvements: Further Evidence. Paper no. 477, Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. http://lsr. nellco.org/harvard-olin/477 (accessed October 30, 2010).
27. Izrael, D., D. C. Hoaglin, and M. P. Battaglia. 2000. A SAS Macro for Balancing a Weighted Sample. SAS Conference Proceedings: SAS Users Group International 25, Paper 258-25.
28. Izrael, D., D. C. Hoaglin, and M. P. Battaglia. 2004. To Rake or Not to Rake Is Not the Question Anymore with the Enhanced Raking Macro. SAS Conference Proceedings: SAS Users Group International 29, Paper 207-29.
29. Kuchler, F., A. Tegene, and J. M. Harris. 2005. Taxing Snack Foods: Manipulating Diet Quality or Financing Information Programs? Review of Agricultural Economics 27:4-20.
30. Kukar-Kinney, M., R. G. Walters, and S. B. MacKenzie. 2007. Consumer Responses to Characteristics of Price-Matching Guarantees: The Moderating Role of Price Consciousness. Journal of Retailing 83:211-221.
31. Lemon, K. N., and S. M. Nowlis. 2002. Developing Synergies Between Promotions and Brands in Different Price-Quality Tiers. Journal of Marketing Research 39:171-185.
32. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
33. Lusk, J. L., and B. C. Briggeman. 2009. Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91:184-196.
34. Lusk, J. L., and T. C. Schroeder. 2004. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:467-482. (Pubitemid 38546647)
35. Mägi, A. W., and C. R. Julander 2005. Consumers'Store-Level Price Knowledge: Why Are Some Consumers More Knowledgeable than Others? Journal of Retailing 81:319-329. (Pubitemid 41614245)
36. Marley, A. A. J., and J. J. Louviere. 2005. Some Probabilistic Models of Best, Worst, and Best-Worst Choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49:464-480. (Pubitemid 43046070)
37. Mayhew, G. E., and R. S. Winer. 1992. An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data. Journal of Consumer Research 19:62-70.
38. Mazumdar, T., S. P. Raj, and I. Sinha. 2005. Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions. Journal of Marketing 69:84-102. (Pubitemid 41504940)
39. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
40. Moon, S., G. J. Russell, and S. D. Duvvuri. 2006. Profiling the Reference Price Consumer. Journal of Retailing 82:1-11. (Pubitemid 43174890)
41. Progressive Grocer. 2002. 69th Annual Report of the Grocery Industry. New York: VNU Publishers.
42. Revelt, D., and K. Train. 1998. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1998):647-657. (Pubitemid 128344306)
43. Sudhir, K. 2001. Structural Analysis of Manufacturer Pricing in the Presence of a Strategic Retailer. Marketing Science 20:244-264.
44. Steenkamp, J. E. M., and K. Gielens. 2003. Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods. Journal of Consumer Research 30:368-384. (Pubitemid 38118558)
45. Swait, J., and J. Louviere. 1993. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Use of Multinomial Logit Models. Journal of Marketing Research 30:305-314.
46. Thurstone, L. L. 1927. A Law of Comparative Judgment. Psychological Review 34:273-286.
47. Walker, J. 2002. Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification. Transportation Research Record 1805:86-98.
48. Zhen, Z., J. L. Taylor, M. K. Muth, and E. Leibtag. 2009. Understanding Differences in Self-Reported Expenditures between Household scanningner Data and Diary Survey Data: A Comparison of Homescan and Consumer Expenditure Survey. Review of Agricultural Economics 31:470-492.