Mixed logit models: Accuracy and software choice

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 167-172

  Chang, Jae Bong ^a   Lusk, Jayson L ^b  

^a Korea Rural Economic Institute   (South Korea)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650964745     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: 10991255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.1201     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bajari P, Fox JT, Ryan SP. 2007. Linear regression estimation of discrete choice models with nonparametric distributions of random coefficients. American Economic Review 97: 459-463.
2. Bhat CR. 2001. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Part B 35: 677-693.
3. Chang JB, Lusk JL, Norwood FB. 2009. How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict field behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 518-534.
4. Chiou L, Walker JL. 2007. Masking identification of discrete choice models under simulation methods. Journal of Econometrics 141: 683-703.
5. Huber J, Train K. 2001. On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths. Marketing Letters 12: 259-269.
6. Kolenikov S. 2001. Review of Stata 7. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 637-646.
7. McCullough BD. 1998. Assessing the numerical reliability of statistical software. Part I. American Statistician 52: 358-366.
8. McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447-470.
9. McKenzie CR, Takaoka S. 2003. 2002: a LIMDEP odyssey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 241-247.
10. Train KE. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: New York.