Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections

Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 31-50

  VanPatten, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917254728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610607     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Archibald, J. (Ed.). (2000). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
2. Aronoff, M., & Anshen, F. (1998). Morphology and the lexicon: Lexicalization and productivity. In A.Spencer & A.M.Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 235-247). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3. Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B.VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207-225). Mahwah NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
4. Bybee, J. (1991). Natural morphology: The organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In T.Huebner & C.Ferfuson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 67-91). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
5. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia: Benjamins
6. Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1994). Introduction. In C.Clifton, L.Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
7. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C., & Corley, M.M.B. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M.Carreiras, J.E.García-Albea, & N.Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
9. DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.
10. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. In C.Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ellis, N.C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
12. Ellis, N.C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
13. Ellis, N.C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297-339.
14. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: a connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Farley, A.P. (2004). Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B.VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: theory, research, and commentary (pp. 227-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
16. Fernández, E. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. In E.Klein & G.Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 217-239). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
17. Fodor, J.D. (1999). Learnability theory: Triggers for parsing with. In E.Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 363-406). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
18. Fourcin, A. (1975). Language development in the absence of expressive speech. In E. Lenneberg & E.Lenneber (Eds.), Foundations of language development (pp. 263-268). New York: Academic Press.
19. Gass, S.M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
20. Gass, S.M. & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
21. Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
22. Gregg, K.D. (1989). Second language acquisition theory: The case for a generative perspective. In S.M.Gass & J.Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gregg, K.D. (2001). Learnability and second language acquisition theory. In P.Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 152-180). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Harrington, M.K. (2001). Sentence processing. In P.Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 91-124). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
26. Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticy. In P.Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: an experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
28. Jensen, J.T., & Strong-Jensen, M. (1984). Morphology in the lexicon! Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 474-498.
29. Juffs, A. (2000). An overview of the second language acquisition of links between verb semantics and morpho-syntax. In J.Archibald (Ed.) Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 187-227). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
30. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
31. Kellerman, E. (1985). In S.M.Gass & C.Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 345-353). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
33. Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102-129). Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M.H. (1991). Introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
35. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Lightbown, P.M. (1983). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H.Seliger & M.Long (Eds.), Classroomoriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 217-243). Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
37. Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (rev. ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Lightfoot, D. (1991). How to set parameters. Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Long, M.H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
40. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 557-597.
41. MacWhinney, B. (1997). SLA and the Competition Model. In A.M.B.de Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
42. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
43. Martohardjono, G. (1993). Wh- movement in the acquisition of a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
44. Mazurkewich, I. & White, L. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition, 16, 261-283.
45. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.
46. Mitchell, R. & Meyers, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
47. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development:Processability theory. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
48. Pinker, S.D. (1994). The language instinct. New York: HarperCollins.
49. Pritchett, B.L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
50. Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: a minimalist introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Rumelhart (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.Spiro, B.Bruce & W.Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
52. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2003). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 53.
53. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R.R.Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 23-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
54. Schmidt, R.W. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
55. Schmidt, R.W. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.
56. Schmidt, R.W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R.W.Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
57. Schwartz, B.D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
58. Schwartz, B.D. (1998). The second language instinct. Lingua, 106, 133-160.
59. Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R. (2000). When syntactic theories evolve. In J.Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156-186). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
60. Sorace, A. (1999). Initial states, end states and residual optionality in L2 acquisition. In A.Greenbill, H.Littlefield, & C.Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 666-674). Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.
61. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.M.Gass & C.Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
62. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C.Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63. Towell, R. & Hawkins, D. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
64. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65. VanPatten, B. (2000). Processing instruction as form-meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In J.F.Lee & A.Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning: multiple perspectives (pp. 43-68). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
66. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: an update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
67. VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in SLA. In B.VanPatten (Ed), Processing instruction: theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-31) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
69. VanPatten, B. & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
70. Varonis, E.M. & Gass, S.M. (1985). Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
71. White, J. (1998). Getting the learner's attention: a typographical input enhancement study. In C.Doughty & J.Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
72. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Phihladelphia:Benjamins.
73. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
74. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
75. Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13, 109-132.
76. Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: the roles of explicit information and structured input. In B.VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.