The leadership continuum: A framework for organizational and individual assessment relative to the advancement of women physicians and scientists

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 387-396

  Morahan, Page S ^a   Rosen, Sally E ^b   Richman, Rosalyn C ^a   Gleason, Katharine A ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACULTY PRACTICE; FEMALE; FEMALE PHYSICIAN; FEMALE WORKER; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CAREER MOBILITY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PHYSICIAN EXECUTIVES; PHYSICIANS, WOMEN; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 79952756391     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2055     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Nora LM. Academic medicine gets a poor report card: What are we going to do? Acad Med 2002;77:1062-1066. (Pubitemid 35155236)
2. Bickel J, Wara DW, Atkinson BF, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Acad Med 2002;77:1043-1061. (Pubitemid 35155235)
3. White JS. Pipeline to pathways: New directions for im-proving the status of women on campus. Liberal Educ 2005;91:22-27.
4. Glazer-Raymo J, ed. Unfinished agendas: New and con-tinuing gender challenges in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.
5. McDade SA, Dannels SA. Shaping the work environment and family-friendly policies: A perspective from deans. In: Lester J, Sallee M, eds. Establishing the family-friendly campus: Models for effective practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2009:105-124.
6. Shollen SL, Bland CJ, Finstad DA, Taylor AL. Organizational climate and family life: How these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad Med 2009;84: 87-94.
7. White FS, McDade SA. The relationship between gender and career progression variables and service factors for deans of U.S. Medical Schools from 1980-2006. Paper presented at: American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, March 25-27, 2008.
8. Morahan PS, Gleason KA, Richman RC, Dannels SA, McDade SA. Advancing women faculty to senior leadership in U.S. academic health centers: Fifteen years of history in the making. J Women Higher Educ 2010;3:137-162.
9. Haslam SA, Ryan MK. The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leader-ship positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Lea-dership Q 2008;19:530-546.
10. Dominici F, Fried LP, Zeger SL. So few women leaders. Academe 2009;95:25-27
11. Morahan PS, Rosen SE, Gleason KA, Richman RC. A con-tinuum of leadership development: A model for sustained success for women leaders in academic medicine. AAMC Faculty Vitae. Available at www.aamc.org/members/old/ facultyvitae/spring09/feature.htm Accessed August 12, 2010.
12. The double-bind dilemma for women in leadership: Damned if you do, doomed if you don't, 2007. Available at www.catalyst.org/publication/83/the-double- bind-dilemma-for-women-in-leadership-damned-if-you-do-doomed-if-you-dont Accessed February 16, 2010.
13. Ely RJ. The power of demography: Women's social con-structions of gender identity at work. Acad Manage J 1995; 38:589-634.
14. Kanter RM. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
15. Dannels SA, Yamagata H, McDade SA, et al. Evaluating a leadership program: A comparative, longitudinal study to assess the impact of the Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM) Program for Women. Acad Med 2008;83:488-495. (Pubitemid 351630264)
16. Bunton SA. Differences in U.S. medical school faculty job satisfaction by gender. Analysis Brief 2008;8:1-2.
17. Bagihole B. How to keep a good woman down: An inves-tigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics. Br J Sociol Educ 1993;14:261-274
18. Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Aca-demic Science and Engineering, Committee on Science En-gineering and Public Policy. Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
19. Committee on Guide to Recruiting and Advancing Women Scientists and Engineers in Academia, Committee on Wo-men in Science and Engineering, National Research Council. To recruit and advance: Women, students and faculty in U.S. science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Acade-mies Press, 2007.
20. Isaac C, Lee B, Carnes M. Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review. Acad Med 2009;84:1440-1446.
21. Valian V. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
22. Acker J. Gendering organizational theory. In: Mills AJ, Tancred P, eds. Gendering organizational analysis. Thou-sand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1992:248-269.
23. Carli LL. Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. J Soc Issues 1999;55:81-99.
24. Ridgeway CL. Bias in the evaluation of women lead-ers: Gender, status, and leadership. J Soc Issues 2001;57: 637-655.
25. Center for Gender in Organizations. Rethinking manage-ment: What's gender got to do with it? Boston, MA: Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Manage-ment, 2004.
26. Kanter RM. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Am J Sociol 1977;82:965-990.
27. Etzkowitz H, Kemelgor C, Neuschatz M, Uzzi B, Alonzo J. The paradox of critical mass from women in science. Science 1994;266:51-54. (Pubitemid 24347486)
28. Martin J, Meyerson D. Women and power. In: Kramer RM, Neale MA, eds. Power and influence in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:311-348.
29. Gleason KA, Richman RC, Morahan PS. More women at the top: One program's success in preparing and sustaining women for leadership in the sciences. Scientist 2008;22: 24-26.
30. Ehrenberg RG, Jakubson GH, Martin ML, Main JB, Eisen-berg T. Do trustees and administrators matter? Diversifying the faculty across gender lines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI), 2010.
31. Lawler A. Tenured women battle to make it less lonely at the top. Science 1999;286:1272-1278.
32. Richman RC, Magrane D. Spotlight: The Executive Leader-ship in Academic Medicine (ELAM) Program for women: Fourteen years of academic women leaders in medicine, dentistry, and public health. Available at www.aamc.org/members/old/ facultyvitae/spring09/spotlight.htm Accessed August 12, 2010.
33. Dannels SA, McLaughlin JM, Gleason KA, et al. Dental school deans' perceptions of the organizational culture and impact of the ELAM program on the culture and advance-ment of women faculty. J Dent Educ 2009;73:676-688.
34. Dannels SA, McLaughlin JM, Gleason KA, McDade SA, Richman RC, Morahan PS. Medical school deans' percep-tions of organizational climate: Useful indicators for ad-vancement of women faculty and evaluation of a leadership program's impact. Acad Med 2009;84:67-79.
35. McDade SA, Richman RC, Jackson GB, Morahan PS. Effects of participation in the Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM) program on women faculty's perceived leadership capabilities. Acad Med 2004;79:302-309. (Pubitemid 38451079)
36. Ely RJ, Meyerson DE. Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Bos-ton: Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management, 2000.
37. Morahan PS, Bickel J. Capitalizing on women's intellectual capital in the professions. Acad Med 2002;77:110-112. (Pubitemid 34160948)
38. Babcock L, Laschever L. Women don't ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
39. Baldwin R, DeZure D, Shaw A, Moretto K. Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Im-plications for faculty and academic leaders. Change 2008; 40:46-55.
40. Mark S, Link H, Morahan PS, Pololi L, Reznik V, Sims ST. Innovative mentoring programs to promote gender equity in academic medicine. Acad Med 2001;76:39-42. (Pubitemid 32066598)
41. Allen TD, Eby LT, Lentz E. Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring pro-grams: Closing the gap between research and practice. J Appl Psychol 2006;91:567-578. (Pubitemid 43936971)
42. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. Mentoring in aca-demic medicine: A systematic review. JAMA 2006;296: 1103-1115. (Pubitemid 44343530)
43. Springs SL, Braff M. The NSF ADVANCE program: Pro-moting women in academic science and engineering. AWIS Magazine. Alexandria, VA: Association for Women in Sci-ence, 2007(spring):14-16.
44. Sloma-Williams L, McDade SA, Richman RC, Morahan PS. The role of self-efficacy in developing women leaders: A case of women leaders in academic medicine and dentistry. In: Dean DR, Bracken SJ, Allen JK, eds. Women in academic leadership: Professional strategies, personal choices. Ster-ling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2009:50-73.
45. Bakken LL, Sheridan J, Carnes M. Gender differences among physician-scientists in self-assessed abilities to perform clinical research. Acad Med 2003;78:1281-1286. (Pubitemid 37523040)
46. Barsh J, Cranston S, Craske RA. Centered leadership: How talented women thrive. A new approach to leadership can help women become more self-confident and effec-tive business leaders. Available at www.mckinseyquarterly. com=Strategy=Centered-leadership-How-talented-women- thrive-2193 Accessed January 22, 2009.
47. American Council on Education (ACE). An agenda for ex-cellence: Creating flexibility in tenure-track faculty careers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education 2005.
48. Bristol MN, Abbuhl S, Cappola AR, Sonnad SS. Work-life policies for faculty at the top ten medical schools. J Womens Health 2008;7:1311-1320.
49. Morahan PS, Voytko ML, Abbuhl S, et al. Ensuring the success of women faculty at AMCs: Lessons learned from the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. Acad Med 2001;76:19-31. (Pubitemid 32066596)
50. Bickel J, Brown AJ. Generation X: Implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med 2005;80:205-210. (Pubitemid 40316113)
51. Evans G She wins, you win: The most important rule every businesswoman needs to know. New York: Gotham Books, 2003.
52. Rudman LA. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression man-agement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74:629-645. (Pubitemid 128658094)
53. Blackmore J, Sachs J. Performing and reforming leaders: Gender, educational restructuring, and organizational change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2007
54. Ely RJ, Foldy EG, Scully MA, eds. Reader in gender, work and organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
55. Carnes M, Handelsman J, Sheridan J. Diversity in academic medicine: The stages of change model. J Womens Health 2005;14:471-475. (Pubitemid 41479251)
56. Schiller M. Case study: Avon Mexico. In: Watkins JM, Mohr BJ, eds. Appreciative inquiry: Change at the speed of imagination. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 2001:123-126.
57. Cottingham AH, Suchman AL, Litzelman DK, et al. En-hancing the informal curriculum of a medical school: A case study in organizational culture change. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:715-722.
58. Pascale RT, Sternin J. Your company's secret change agents. Harvard Business Rev 2005;83:72-81,153.
59. Marsh D, Schroder D, Dearden K, Sternin J, Sternin M. The power of positive deviance. BM J 2004;329:4-1177-1179.
60. Lucey C, Souba W. Perspective: The problem with the problem of professionalism Acad Med 2010;85:1018-1024.
61. Meyerson DE, Fletcher JK. A modest manifesto for shatter-ing the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Rev 2000;78:127-136.
62. The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. New York: Catalyst, Inc. 2004. Available at www.catalyst.org=publication=82=the- bottom-line-con-necting-corporate-performance-and-gender-diversity. Accessed February 16, 2010.
63. Making change: Tackling resistance to diversity efforts. New York: Catalyst, Inc. 2002.
64. Health Resources and Services Administration. Indicators of cultural competence in health care delivery organizations: An organizational cultural competence assessment profile. Available at www.hrsa.gov=culturalcompetence= indicators= Accessed January 14, 2002.
65. Mayeno LY. Multicultural organizational development: A resource for health equity. Los Angeles: CompassPoint Nonprofit Services and The California Endowment, 2007
66. Committee on Gender Differences in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty, Committee on Wo-men in Science, Engineering and Medicine, National Re-search Council. Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering and mathematics faculty. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2009.
67. Marchant A, Battacharya A, Carnes M. Can the language of tenure criteria influence women's academic advancement? J Womens Health 2007;16:998-1003. (Pubitemid 47479943)
68. Morrissey CS, Schmidt ML. Fixing the system, not the women: An innovative approach to faculty advancement. J Womens Health 2008;17:1399-1408.
69. Marcus J. Helping academics have families and tenure too. Change 2007:27-32.
70. Ragins BR, McFarlin DB. Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. J Vocat Behav 1990; 37:321-339.
71. Gersick CJG, Bartunek JM, Dutton JE. Learning from aca-demia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Acad Manage J 2000;43:1026-1044. (Pubitemid 33216831)
72. Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD. In-civility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. J Occup Health Psychol 2001;6:64-80.
73. Forbes N. Women in the workplace: Supportive or com-petitive. AWIS Magazine 2006;35:13-16.
74. Kram KE, Hampton MM. When women lead: The visibility-vulnerability spiral. In: Klein EB, Gabelnick F, Herr P, eds. The psychodynamics of leadership. Madison, CT: Psycho-social Press, 1998:193-218.
75. Holvino E. Complicating gender: The simultaneity of race, gender, and class in organization change. In: Ely RJ, Foldy EG, Scully MA, The Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management, eds. Reader in gender, work, and organization. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003:87-98.
76. Kalet AL, Fletcher KE, Ferdman DJ, Bickell NA. Defining, navigating, and negotiating success: The experiences of mid-career Robert Wood Johnson clinical scholar women. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:920-925. (Pubitemid 44141759)
77. Bakken LL. Who are physician-scientists' role models? Gender makes a difference. Acad Med 2005;80:502-506. (Pubitemid 40586478)
78. Terosky AL, Phifer T, Neumann A. Shattering plexiglas: Continuing challenge for women professors in research universities. In: Glazer-Raymo J, ed. Unfinished agendas: New and continuing gender challenges in higher educa-tion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008:52-79.