Dealing with High Demands: The Role of Action Versus State Orientation

Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 332-352

  Jostmann, Nils B ^a   Koole, Sander L ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action Versus State Orientation (AOD) effects above alternative personality variables; action oriented individuals and state oriented individuals; Dealing with high demands role of action versus state orientation; Demand related action orientation (AOD); Dynamics of working memory; Individual differences in action versus state orientation; Living up to high demands draining people's energy, undermining performance, and sulkiness; Role of action versus state orientation; Role of individual differences in action control coping with high demands; Updating model of volitional action control

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952731699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444318111.ch15     Document Type: Chapter

References (105)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
3. Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224-237.
4. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
7. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition, Vol. 1 Basic Processes (2nd Ed., pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Affect regulation and motive-incongruent achievement goals: Antecedents of subjective well-being and symptom formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781-799.
9. Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). How to resist temptation: The effects of external control versus autonomy support. Journal of Personality, 73, 443-470.
10. Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 584-600.
11. Beswick, G., & Mann. L. (1994). State orientation and procrastination. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 391-396). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
12. Bossong, B. (1998). Stress und Handlungskontrolle [Stress and action control ]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
13. Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (713-737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Brunstein, J. C. (2001). Persönliche Ziele und Handlungsorientierung: Wer bindet sich an realistische und bedürfniskongruente Ziele? [Personal goals and action orientation: Who commits to realistic and need-congruent goals?] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 1-12.
15. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and the affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
16. Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structure and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452.
17. Chartrand, T. L., Van Baaren, R. B., & Bargh, J. A. (2006). Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 70-77.
18. Cohen, A. L., Dixon, R. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1177-1197.
19. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 280-295.
20. De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 45-85.
21. Dibbelt, S. (1997). Wechseln und Beibehalten von Zielen als Subfunktionen der Handlungskontrolle [Change and maintenance of goals as functional components of action control]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Osnabrück, Germany.
22. Diefendorff, J. M. (2004). Examination of the roles of action-state orientation and goal orientation in the goal-setting and performance process. Human Performance, 17, 375-395.
23. Diefendorff, J. M. (2006). Correlations between the ACS-90 and the Big Five personality variables. Unpublished dataset, University of Colorado at Denver.
24. Diefendorff, J. M., Hall, R. J., Lord, R. G., & Strean, M. L. (2000). Action-state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 250-263.
25. Diefendorff, J. M., Lord, R. G., Hepburn, E. T., Quickle, J. S., Hall, R. J., & Sanders, R. E. (1998). Perceived self-regulation and individual differences in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 228-247.
26. Diefendorff, J. M., Richard, E. M., & Gosserand, R. H. (2006). Examination of situational and attitudinal moderators of the hesitation and performance relation. Personnel Psychology, 59, 365-393.
27. Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 343-353.
28. Dreisbach, G., Müller, J., Goschke, T., Strobel, A., Schulze, K., Lesch, KP., et al. (2005). Dopamine and cognitive control: The influence of spontaneous eyeblink rate and dopamine gene polymorphisms on perseveration and distractibility. Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 483-490.
29. Duncan, J. (1995). Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 721-733). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
31. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
32. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 33-39.
34. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201-225.
35. Fuhrmann, A., & Kuhl, J. (1998). Maintaining a healthy diet: Effects of personality and selfreward versus self-punishment on commitment to and enactment of self-chosen and assigned goals. Psychology & Health, 13, 651-686.
36. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
37. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141-185.
38. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 403-422). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
40. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53-92). Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum.
41. Gray, J. R., Burgess, G. C., Schaefer, A., Yarkoni, T., Larsen, R. J., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Affective personality differences in neural processing efficiency confirmed using fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 182-190.
42. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.
43. Haschke, R., & Kuhl, J. (1995). Frust und Fliegen [Frustration and flying]. Aeromed Info, 6, 1-2.
44. Heckhausen, H., & Strang, H. (1988). Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion control - An individual difference variable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 489-498.
45. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
46. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
47. Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73-93.
48. Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Vemon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577-592.
49. Jostmann, N. B. (2006). Correlations between the ACS-90 and related personality variables. Unpublished dataset, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
50. Jostmann, N. B., & Gieselmann, A. (2008). Changing mindsets: The effect of action versus state orientation on planning ability after deliberating a difficult problem. Unpublished manuscript, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
51. Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2006). On the waxing and waning of working memory: Action versus state orientation moderates the impact of demanding relationship primes on working memory capacity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1716-1728.
52. Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2007). On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 593-609.
53. Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2009). When persistence is futile: A functional analysis of action orientation and goal disengagement. In G. Moskowitz & H. Grant (Eds.), The Psychology of Goals (pp. 337-61). New York: Guilford Press.
54. Jostmann, N. B., Koole, S. L., Van der Wulp, N. Y., & Fockenberg, D. A. (2005). Subliminal affect regulation: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. European Psychologist, 10, 209-217.
55. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
56. Kendzierski, D. (1990). Decision making versus decision implementation: An action control approach to exercise adoption and adherence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 27-45.
57. Koole, S. L. (2004). Volitional shielding of the self: Effects of action orientation and external demand on implicit self-evaluation. Social Cognition, 22, 100-125.
58. Koole, S. L. (2005). Action versus state orientation, and promotion versus prevention focus. Unpublished dataset, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
59. Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and social demand on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974-990.
60. Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). On the hidden benefits of state orientation: Can people prosper without efficient affect regulation skills? In A. Tesser, J. Woods, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 217-244). New York: Psychology Press.
61. Koole, S. L., Kuhl. J., Jostmann, N. B., & Finkenauer, C. (2006 ). Self-regulation in interpersonal relationships: The case of action versus state orientation. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 360-383). New York: Guilford Press.
62. Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state versus action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 155-170.
63. Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
64. Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 47-59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
65. Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994a). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
67. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994b). Alienation: Ignoring one's preferences. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 375-389). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
68. Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components inventory. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and selfregulation across the life-span (pp. 15-49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Kuhl, J., & Goschke, T. (1994a). A theory of action control: Mental subsystems, modes of control, and volitional conflict-resolution strategies. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 93-124). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
70. Kuhl, J., & Goschke, T. (1994b). State orientation and the activation and retrieval of intentions in memory. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 127-154). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
71. Kuhl, J., & Helle, P. (1986). Motivational and volitional determinants of depression: The degenerated-intention hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Behavior, 95, 247-251.
72. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382-399.
73. Kuhl, J., & Keller, H. (2008). Affect-regulation, self-development and parenting: A functionaldesign approach to cross-cultural differences. In R. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 19-47). New York: Elsevier.
74. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
75. Lorist, M. M., Boksem, M. A. S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 199-205.
76. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
77. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
78. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (1988). Stress inoculation training. The Counseling Psychologist, 16, 69-90.
79. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
80. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
81. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361-394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor-compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 371-391). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and selfregulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
84. Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396.
85. Palfai, T. P. (2002). Action-state orientation and the self-regulation of eating behavior. Eating Behaviors, 3, 249-259.
86. Palfai, T. P., McNally, A. M., & Roy, M. (2002). Volition and alcohol-risk reduction: The role of action orientation in the reduction of alcohol-related harm among college student drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 309-317.
87. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
88. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89. Rothermund, K., Voss, A., & Wentura, D. (2008). Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: A basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in emotion and motivation. Emotion, 8, 34-46.
90. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
91. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
92. Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 241-255.
93. Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33-46.
94. Schönpflug, W. (1983). Coping efficiency and situational demands. In G. R. J. Hockey (Ed.), Stress and fatigue in human performance (pp. 299-330). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
95. Schulte, D., Hartung, J., & Wilke, F. (1997). Handlungskontrolle der Angstbewältigung: Was macht Reizkonfrontationsverfahren so effektiv? [Action control in treatment of anxiety disorders: What makes exposure so effective?] Zeitschrift für Klinische Pyschologie, 26, 118-128.
96. Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 601-630.
97. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness. On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
98. Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261-1280.
99. Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., John, M., Stulik, A., & Schürmann, M. (1989). Die Wahl von Entscheidungsstrategien: Der Einfluß von Handlungs- und Lageorientierung und die Bedeutung psychologischer Kosten. [The choice of decision-making strategies: The effects of action vs. state orientation and the role of psychological costs.] Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 36, 292-310.
100. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
101. Tesser, A., Millar, M., & Moore, J. (1988). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 49-61.
102. Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147-168.
103. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
104. Van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 454-65.
105. Zeidner, M., & Endler, N. S. (1996). Handbook of coping. New York: Wiley.