Concurrent extinction does not render appetitive conditioning context specific

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 87-94

  Nelson, James Byron ^a   Lombas, Sebastián ^a   Léon, Samuel P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Associative learning; Attention; Extinction; Renewal

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; WISTAR RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 79952722158     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: 15434508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-011-0023-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Archer, T., Sjödén, P., & Nilsson, L. (1985). Contextual control of taste aversion conditioning and extinction. In P. D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 225-271). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Bonardi, C., Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237. (Pubitemid 20233023)
3. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
4. Bouton, M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In M. E. Bouton & M. S. Fanselow (Eds.), Learning, motivation and cognition: The functional behaviourism of Robert C. Bolles (pp. 385-409). Washington: American Psychological Association.
5. Bouton, M. E. (2000). A learning theory perspective on lapse, relapse, and the maintenance of behavior change. Health Psychology, 19, 57-63.
6. Bouton, M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11, 485-494. (Pubitemid 39299694)
7. Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366-379.
8. Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., & Rosas, J. M. (2011). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36(4), 482-494.
9. Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154.
10. Howell, D. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury.
11. Nelson, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284-310.
12. Nelson, J. B. (2009). Contextual control of first- and second-learned excitation and inhibition in equally ambiguous stimuli. Learning & Behavior, 37, 95-106.
13. Nelson, J. B., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). The effects of a context switch following serial and simultaneous feature-negative discriminations. Learning and Motivation, 28, 56-84. (Pubitemid 127175600)
14. Nelson, J. B., & Callejas-Aguillera, J. E. (2007). The role of interference produced by conflicting associations in contextual control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 314-326. (Pubitemid 47444992)
15. Nelson, J. B., del Carmen Sanjuan, M., Vadillo-Ruiz, S., Pérez, J., & León S. P. (2011). Experimental renewal in human participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes (In press).
16. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
17. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607. (Pubitemid 24976818)
18. Rescorla, R. A. (2008). Within-subject renewal in sign tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1793-1802.
19. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Renewal of conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one. Learning and Motivation, 28, 216-229. (Pubitemid 127168491)
20. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1998). Context and retention interval can have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion conditioning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 79-83. (Pubitemid 128455955)
21. Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 461-474. (Pubitemid 43883051)
22. Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned alter extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 9-15. (Pubitemid 44905396)
23. Rosas, J. M., Callejas-Aguilera, J. E., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M., & Abad, M. J. F. (2006). Revision of retrieval theory of forgetting: What does make information context-specific? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6, 147-166.
24. Rosas, J. M., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2006). Effects of context change upon retrieval of first and secondlearned information in human predictive learning. Psicológica, 27, 35-56. (Pubitemid 43528489)
25. Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of the estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-114.
26. Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1989). Taste-aversion conditioning: The role of contextual stimuli. In T. Archer & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety perspectives on aversively motivated behavior (pp. 87-120). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
27. Welch, B. L. (1938). The significance of the difference between twomeans when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 34, 29-35.
28. Williams, B. A., & McDevitt, M. A. (2002). Inhibition and superconditioning. Psychological Science, 13, 454-459. (Pubitemid 41692268)