Renewal of a conditioned taste aversion upon return to the conditioning context after extinction in another one

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 216-229

  Rosas, Juan M ^a   Bouton, Mark E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031142036     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/lmot.1996.0960     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Archer, T., Sjödén, P., & Nilsson, L. (1985). Contextual control of taste-aversion conditioning and extinction. In P. D. Balsamn & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 225-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Archer, T., Sjödén, P. O., Nilsson, L. G., & Carter, N. (1980). Exteroceptive context in taste-aversion conditioning and extinction: Odour, cage, and bottle stimulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 197-214.
3. Best, M. R., Brown, E. R., & Sowell, M. K. (1984). Taste mediated potentiation of noingestional stimuli in rats. Learning and Motivation, 15, 244-258.
4. Bonardi, C., Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1990). Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 229-237.
5. Bouton, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. W. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 25-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
7. Bouton, M. E. (1994). Context, ambiguity, and classical conditioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 49-53.
8. Bouton, M. E., & Brooks, D. C. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 165-179.
9. Bouton, M. E., & Peck, C. A. (1989). Context effects on conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement in an appetitive conditioning preparation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 188-198.
10. Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317-324.
11. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333-350.
12. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1989). Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 43-53.
13. Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 77-89.
14. Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366-379.
15. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
16. Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 121-139.
17. Howell, D. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury.
18. Holder, M. D. (1988a). Possible role of confounded taste stimuli in conditioned taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 231-234.
19. Holder, M. D. (1988b). Reply to Sjödén and Archer. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 240-241.
20. Kehoe, E. J., & Gormezano, I. (1980). Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 351-378.
21. Krane, R. V. (1980). Toxiphobia conditioning with exteroceptive cues. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 513-523.
22. Loy, I., Álvarez, R., Rey, V., & López, M. (1993). Context-US associations rather that occassion setting in taste aversion learning. Learning and Motivation, 24, 55-72.
23. Mitchell, C., & Heyes, C. (1996). Simultaneous overshadowing and potentiation of taste and contextual cues by a second taste in toxicosis conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 27, 58-72.
24. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, trans.). London: Oxford Univ. Press.
25. Puente, G. P., Cannon, D. S., Best, M. R., & Carrell, L. E. (1988). Occasion setting of fluid ingestion by contextual cues. Learning and Motivation, 19, 239-253.
26. Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for "unique stimulus" account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331-338.
27. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 341-348.
29. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Context change and retention interval can have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30. Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1988). Exteroceptive cues in taste-aversion learning, no artifact: Reply to Holder. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 235-239.
31. Sjödén, P., & Archer, T. (1989). Taste-aversion conditioning: The role of contextual stimuli. In T. Archer & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety perspectives on aversively motivated behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Skinner, D. M., Martin, G. M., Howe R. D., Pridgar A., & Van Der Kooy D. (1995). Drug discrimination learning using a taste aversion paradigm: Assessment of the role of safety cues. Learning and Motivation, 26, 343-369.
33. Spear, N. E. (1973). Retrieval of memory in animals. Psychological Review, 80, 163-194.
34. Wagner, A. R. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Welker, R. L., & McAuley, K. (1978). Reductions in resistance to extinction and spontaneous recovery as a function of changes in transportational and contextual stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 451-457.
37. Westbrook, R. F., & Brookes, N. (1988). Potentiation and blocking of conditioned flavour and context aversions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B 40, 3-30.