Locating interim assessments within teachers' assessment practice

Educational Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Riggan, Matthew ^a   Oláh, Leslie Nabors ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952390932     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2011.551085     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-75.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London, UK: Sage.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.
5. Bulkley, K. E., Christman, J. C., Goertz, M. E., & Lawrence, N. R. (2010). Building with benchmarks: The role of the district in Philadelphia's benchmark assessment system. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, 186-204.
6. Christman, J., Neild, R., Bulkley, K., Blanc, S., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., & Travers, E. (2009). Making the most of interim assessment data. Lessons from Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.
7. Clune, W. H., & White, P. A. (2008). Policy effectiveness of interim assessments in Providence public schools (WCER Working Paper No. 2008-10). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
8. Coburn, C. E., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence-based practice in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112, 469-495.
9. Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, DC: CCSSO FAST-SCASS.
10. Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
11. Educational Testing Service, RAND Corporation, & Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. (2010). Understanding teacher quality. Retrieved from http://www.utqstudy.org/instruments.html
12. Goertz, M. E., Oláh, L. N., & Riggan, M. (2010). From Testing to Teaching: The Use of Interim Assessments in Classroom Instruction. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
13. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
14. Henderson, S., Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Hamilton, S. (2008). A second follow-up year for "Measuring how benchmark assessments affect student achievement" (REL Technical Brief. REL 2008-No. 002). Newton, MA: Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
15. Herman, J., Osmundson, E., Ayala, C., Schneider, S., & Timms, M. (2006). The nature and impact of teachers' formative assessment practices (CSE Technical Rep. No. 703). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
16. Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement:Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journalof Education, 112, 496-520.
17. Matsumura, L., Slater, S., Junker, B., Peterson, M., Boston, M., Steele, M., & Resnick, L. (2006). Measuring reading comprehension and mathematics instruction in urban middle schools: A pilot study of the Instructional Quality Assessment (CSE Technical Rep. No. 681). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through Grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
19. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155-175.
20. Oláh, L. N., Lawrence, N., & Riggan, M. (2010) Learning to learn from benchmark assessment data: How teachers analyze results. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, 226-245.
21. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 5-13.
23. Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2009). Classroom processes and positive youth development: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of interactions between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 121,33-46.
24. Popham, W. J. (2006, June). Defining and enhancing formative assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Large-Scale Assessment Conference, Council of Chief State School Officers, San Francisco, CA.
25. Quint, J., Sepanik, S., & Smith, J. K. (2008, December). Using student data to improve teaching and learning: Findings from an evaluation of the Formative Assessments of Students Thinking in Reading (FAST-R) program in Boston elementary schools. New York, NY: MDRC.
26. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2004). Informal formative assessment of students' understanding of scientific inquiry (CSE Rep. No. 639). Los Angeles, CA: CRESST, University of California, Los Angeles.
27. Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295-314.
28. Shepard, L. (2010). What the marketplace has brought us: Item-by-item teaching with little instructional insight. Peabody Journal of Education, 85, 246-257.
29. Shepard, L., Flexer, R. J., Weston, T. J., Marion, S. F., Mayfield, V., & Hiebert, E. H. (1996). Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(3), 7-18.
30. Supovitz, J. A. (2006). The case for district-based reform: Leading, building, and sustaining school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
31. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615-631.
32. Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2006, April). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.
33. Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers' use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 1112, 521-548.