A Review of Research Into the Development of Radiologic Expertise: Implications for Computer-Based Training

Academic Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1252-1263

  Taylor, Paul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

education; medical; professional competence; Radiology; visual perception

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COGNITION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; LEARNING; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 34548705406     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., and Donaldson M.S. Executive summary. "To err is human: building a safer health system." (2000), Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington DC
2. Goddard P., Leslie A., Jones A., et al. Error in radiology. Br J Radiol 74 (2001) 949-951
3. van Rijn J.C., Klemetso N., Reitsma J.B., et al. Observer variation in the evaluation of lumbar herniated discs and root compression: spiral CT compared with MRI. Br J Radiol 79 (2006) 372-377
4. Halligan S., Marshall M., Taylor S., et al. Observer variation in the detection of colorectal neoplasia on double-contrast barium enema: implications for colorectal cancer screening and training. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 948-954
5. Manning D.J., Ethell S.C., and Donovan T. Detection or decision errors?. Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol 77 (2004) 231-235
6. Monnier-Cholley L., Carrat F., Cholley B.P., et al. Detection of lung cancer on radiographs: receiver operating characteristic analyses of radiologists,' pulmonologists,' and anesthesiologists' performance. Radiology 233 (2004) 799-805
7. Erly W.K., Berger W.G., Krupinski E., et al. Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. Am J Neuroradiol 23 (2002) 103-107
8. Lal N.R., Murray U.M., Eldevik O.P., et al. Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents. Am J Neuroradiol 21 (2000) 124-129
9. Roehrig J. The manufacturer's perspective. Br J Radiol 78 (2005) S41-S45
10. Johnston K., and Brown J. Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options. BMJ 319 (1999) 1097-1102
11. Laming D., and Warren R. Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms. J Med Screen 7 (2000) 24-33
12. Fenton J.J., Taplin S.H., Carney P.A., et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 1399-1409
13. Wigton R. Social judgement theory and medical judgement. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (1996) 175-100
14. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131
15. Harries C., Evans J.St.B.T., and Dennis I. Measuring doctors' self-insight into their treatment decisions. Appl Cognit Psychol 14 (2000) 455-477
16. Graber M., Gordon R., and Franklin N. Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what's the goal?. Acad Med 77 (2002) 981-992
17. Swensson R.G., Hessel S.J., and Herman P.G. The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. Invest Radiol 20 (1985) 100-114
18. Berbaum K.S., Franken Jr. E.A., Dorfman D.D., et al. Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. Invest Radiol 23 (1988) 48-55
19. Loy C.T., and Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 292 (2004) 1602-1609
20. Dawes T.J., Vowler S.L., Allen C.M., et al. Training improves medical student performance in image interpretation. Br J Radiol 77 (2004) 775-776
21. Nodine C.F., Kundel H.L., Mello-Thoms C., et al. How experience and training influence mammography expertise. Acad Radiol 6 (1999) 575-585
22. Mello-Thoms C. Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation. Acad Radiol 10 (2003) 4-12
23. Beam C.A., Conant E.F., and Sickles E.A. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003) 282-290
24. Barlow W.E., Chi C., Carney P.A., et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 1840-1850
25. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (2005) 358-367
26. Esserman L., Cowley H., Eberle C., et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 94 (2002) 369-375
27. Wagner R.F., Beam C.A., and Beiden S.V. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases. Med Decis Making 24 (2004) 561-572
28. Bartlett F.C. Remembering: an experimental and social study (1932), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
29. Schank R., and Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding (1977), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
30. Lesgold A., Rubinson H., Feltovitch P., et al. Expertise in a complex skill: diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: Chi M.T.H., Glaser R., and Farr M.J. (Eds). The nature of expertise (1988), LEA, Hillsdale, NJ
31. Norman G.R. The epistemology of clinical reasoning: perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience. Acad Med 75 10 Suppl (2000) S127-S135
32. Norman G. Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ 39 (2005) 418-427
33. Kulatunga-Moruzi C., Brooks L.R., and Norman G.R. Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis. Teach Learn Med 13 (2001) 110-116
34. Ark T.K., Brooks L.R., and Eva K.W. Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices?. Acad Med 81 (2006) 405-409
35. Kulatunga-Moruzi C., Brooks L.R., and Norman G.R. Using comprehensive feature lists to bias medical diagnosis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30 (2004) 563-572
36. Kundel H. Visual search in medical images. In: Beutel J., Kundel H.L., and Van Metter R.L. (Eds). The handbook of medical imaging: volume 1, physics and psychophysics (2000), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA
37. Nodine C.F., and Mello-Thoms C. The nature of expertise in radiology. In: Beutel J., Kundel H.L., and Van Metter R.L. (Eds). The handbook of medical imaging: volume 1, physics and psychophysics (2000), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA
38. Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., and Carmody D.P. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 13 (1978) 175-181
39. Kundel H., and La Follette P.S. Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology 103 (1972) 523-528
40. Mello-Thoms C., Hardesty L., Sumkin J., et al. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 830-840
41. Kundel H., and Nodine C.F. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology 116 (1975) 527-532
42. Mugglestone M., Gale A.G., Cowley H.C., et al. Diagnostic performance on briefly presented mammographic images. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2436 (1995) 106-115
43. Christensen E.E., Murry R.C., Holland K., et al. The effect of search time on perception. Radiology 138 (1981) 361-365
44. Nodine C.F., Mello-Thoms C., Kundel H.L., et al. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 917-923
45. Mello-Thoms C., Dunn S.M., Nodine C.F., et al. The perception of breast cancers: a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 1297-1306
46. Marr D. Vision (1983), W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
47. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn Sci 8 (2004) 457-464
48. Sowden P.T., Davies I.R., and Roling P. Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26 (2000) 379-390
49. Haller S., and Radue E.W. What is different about a radiologist's brain?. Radiology 236 (2005) 983-989
50. Bar M., Kassam K.S., Ghuman A.S., et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (2006) 449-454
51. Thompson K.G., Biscoe K.L., and Sato T.R. Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 9479-9487
52. Treue S. Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13 (2003) 428-432
53. Thompson K.G., Bichot N.P., and Sato T.R. Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 337-351
54. Collins J. Medical education research: challenges and opportunities. Radiology 240 (2006) 639-647
55. Sharples M., Jeffery N.P., du Boulay B., et al. Structured computer-based training in the interpretation of neuroradiological images. Int J Med Inform 60 (2000) 263-280
56. Ericsson K.A. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79 10 Suppl (2004) S70-S81
57. Lloyd S., Jirotka M., Simpson A.C., et al. Digital mammography: a world without film?. Methods Inf Med 44 (2005) 168-171
58. Gentili A., Chung C.B., and Hughes T. Informatics in radiology: use of the MIRC DICOM service for clinical trials to automatically create teaching file cases from PACS. Radiographics 27 (2007) 269-275
59. Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., Conant E.F., and Weinstein S.P. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 242 (2007) 396-402