Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers?

European Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1939-1950

  Vries, Ayso H ^a   Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Truyen, Roel ^b   Serlie, Iwo W O ^b   Cohen, Rutger H ^c   van Elderen, Saskia G C ^d   Heutinck, Anneke ^a   Kesselring, Oskar ^e   de Monyé, Wouter ^f   te Strake, Lambertus ^g   Wiersma, Tjeerd ^e   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c AMSTELLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f Kennemer Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^g MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Colonic polyps; Colorectal neoplasms; CT colonography; Electronic cleansing; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

IODINE; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIETARY FIBER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM POLYP; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTESTINAL POLYPS; INTESTINES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67650800296     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1360-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570-1595
2. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J et al (2004) CT colonography and colonoscopy: Assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233:328-337
3. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300-1311
4. Jensch S, de Vries AH, Peringa J et al (2008) CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: Performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Radiology 247:122-132
5. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van HB (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1836-1842
6. Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A et al (2008) CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol 18:1385-1395
7. Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M et al (2005) CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 15:1192-1202
8. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: Prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227:378-384
9. Rex DK (2002) Current colorectal cancer screening strategies: Overview and obstacles to implementation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2(Suppl 1):S2-S11
10. Weitzman ER, Zapka J, Estabrook B, Goins KV (2001) Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 32:502-513
11. Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ et al (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451-1456
12. van Gelder RE, Florie J, Nio CY et al (2006) A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:1181-1192
13. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH (2003) Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: Advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:799-805
14. van Rossum L, van Rijn A, Laheij R et al (2008) Random comparison of Guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 135(1):82-90
15. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW et al (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: Conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228:878-885
16. Serlie IW, Vos FM, Truyen R, Post FH, van Vliet LJ (2007) Classifying CT image data into material fractions by a scale and rotation invariant edge model. IEEE Trans Image Process 16:2891-2904
17. Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Walter Reed Army Medical Center (2005) http://wramc.vcscreen.com/training/index.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2005
18. Fennerty MB, Davidson J, Emerson SS, Sampliner RE, Hixson LJ, Garewal HS (1993) Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable. Am J Gastroenterol 88:496-500
19. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U et al (1997) Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate. Gastrointest Endosc 46:497-502
20. Pepe MS (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 35-65
21. Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K, Dachman AH (2007) CT colonography: False-negative interpretations. Radiology 244:165-173
22. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ et al (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:881-889
23. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG et al (2008) Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: Performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:361-366
24. Juchems MS, Ernst A, Johnson P, Virmani S, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ (2008) Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: Diagnostic performance. Abdom Imaging. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9386-6
25. Serlie IW, de Vries AH, Vos FM et al (2008) Lesion conspicuity and efficiency of CT colonography with electronic cleansing based on a three-material transition model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1493-502
26. Wang Z, Liang Z, Li X et al (2006) An improved electronic colon cleansing method for detection of colonic polyps by virtual colonoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:1635-1646
27. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF (2006) Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: Evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology 239:149-159
28. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ (2007) Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: Implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:940-944
29. ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults (2006) http://www.acr.org/ SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/dx/gastro/ ct_colonography.aspx. Accessed 8 July 2008
30. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): Consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17:575-579
31. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2004) CT colonography: Effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025-1033
32. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Del FC, Minoli G (2001) Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: A prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:394-400
33. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207-1217