CT colonography interpretation times: Effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1745-1749

  Burling, David ^a   Halligan, Steve ^b   Altman, Douglas G ^c   Atkin, Wendy ^a   Bartram, Clive ^a   Fenlon, Helen ^d   Laghi, Andrea ^e   Stoker, Jaap ^f   Taylor, Stuart ^b   Frost, Roger ^g   Dessey, Guido ^h   De Villiers, Melinda ^a   Florie, Jasper ^f   Foley, Shane ^d   Honeyfield, Lesley ^a   Iannaccone, Riccardo ^e   Gallo, Teresa ⁱ   Kay, Clive ^j   Lefere, Philippe ^h   Lowe, Andrew ^j   Mangiapane, Filipo ^e   Marrannes, Jesse ^h   Neri, Emmanuele ^k   Nieddu, Giulia ⁱ   Nicholson, David ^l   O'Hare, Alan ^d   Ori, Sante ^e   Politi, Benedetta ^k   Poulus, Martin ^f   Regge, Daniele ⁱ   Renaut, Lisa ^l   Rudralingham, Velauthan ^l   Signoretta, Saverio ⁱ   Vagli, Paola ^k   Van der Hulst, Victor ^f   Williams Butt, Jane ^j   more..

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Medical Statistics Centre for Statistics in Medicine   (United Kingdom)

^d MATER MISERICORDIAE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^e Amsterdam Medical Centre ^*

^f ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g SALISBURY DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h Stedelijk Ziekenhuis Roeselare   (Belgium)

ⁱ Candiolo Oncologic Hospital   (Italy)

^j BRADFORD ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^l HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Colon; Computerised tomography; CT; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXPERIENCE; FATIGUE; HUMAN; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33745865454     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0190-9     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Marin D, Passariello R (2004) Interpretation methods at CT colonography: Two dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) reading. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program (abstract). Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, Ill, p 479
2. Macari M, Lee J, Garcia Figueiras R, Megibow AJ, Bennett GL, Babb JS (2004) Primary 2D versus 3D interpretation techniques using thin section multi-detector row CT colonography. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program (abstract). Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, Ill, p 478
3. Gluecker T, Meuwly JY, Pescatore P, et al (2002) Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 12:1405-1409
4. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Morley S, Bassett P, Atkin W, et al (2004) CT colonography: Effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14:1025-1033
5. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S (2004) Fast reading of CT colonography. In fifth International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy meeting program, Boston, p 143
6. ESGAR CT colonography study group investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT Colonography. Radiology (in press)
7. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, et al (2003) Computerized tomographic colonography: Performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 125:688-695
8. Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D, Davis W, Bosworth HB, Sanders L, et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: Prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305-311
9. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New Engl J Med 349:2191-2200
10. McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA, et al (2002) CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 225:380-390