Chemoinformatics and Library Design

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 685, Issue , 2011, Pages 27-52

  Zhou, Joe Zhongxiang ^a,b  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b San Diego   (United States)

Author keywords

chemical representation; chemical space; Chemoinformatics; diversity; library design; multiobjective optimization; QSAR; QSPR; similarity; virtual screening

Indexed keywords

CHEMINFORMATICS; DATA MINING; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; HUMAN; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; REVIEW; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; DATA MINING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DISCOVERY; HUMANS; INFORMATICS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 79952202030     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-931-4_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Brown, F. B. (1998) Chemoinformatics: what is it and how does it impact drug discovery. Annu Rep Med Chem 33, 375–384.
2. Bohacek, R. S., McMartin, C., Guida, W. C. (1996) The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modeling perspective. Med Res Rev 16, 3–50.
3. Walters, W. P., Stahl, M. T., Murcho, M. A. (1998) Virtual screening–an overview. Drug Discov Today 3, 160–178.
4. Gasteiger, J. (ed.) (2003) Handbook of Chemoinformatics: From Data to Knowledge, Wiley-VCH, Weinhiem.
5. Bajorath, J. (ed.) (2004) Chemoinformatics: Concepts, Methods, and Tools for Drug Discovery, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
6. Oprea, T. I. (ed.) (2005) Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
7. Leach, A. R. and Gillet, V. J. (2007) An Introduction to Chemoinformatics, Springer, London.
8. Bunin, B. A., Siesel, B., Morales, G. A., Bajorath, J. (2007) Chemoinformatics: Theory, Practice, & Products, Springer, The Netherlands.
9. http://www.symyx.com/solutions/white_ papers/ctfile_formats.jsp, last accessed February, 2010.
10. Weininger, D. (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28, 31–36.
11. Weininger, D. (1989) SMILES, 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29, 97–101.
12. Weininger, D. (1990) SMILES, 3. Depict. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 30, 237–243.
13. http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smiles.html, last accessed February, 2010.
14. Simsion, G. C., Witt, G. C. (2001) Data Modeling Essentials, 2nd ed. Coriolis, Scottsdale, USA.
15. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V. (2009) Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
16. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002) Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
17. Borg, I. and Groenen, P. J. F. (2005) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
18. Domine, D., Devillers, J., Chastrette, M., Karcher, W. (1993) Non-linear mapping for structure-activity and structure-property modeling. J Chemometrics 7, 227–242.
19. Wermuth, C. G. (2006) Similarity in drugs: reflections on analogue design. Drug Discov Today 11, 348–354.
20. Willett, P. (2000) Chemoinformatics– similarity and diversity in chemical libraries. Curr Opin Biotech 11, 85–88.
21. Maldonado, A. G., Doucet, J. P., Petitjean, M., Fan, B.-T. (2006) Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: from theory to applications. Mol Divers 10, 39–79.
22. Willett, P. (2006) Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discov Today 11, 1046–1053.
23. Holliday, J. D., Hu, C.-Y., Willett, P. (2002) Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bitstrings. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening 5, 155–166.
24. Dunbar J. B. (1997) Cluster-based selection. Perspect Drug Discov Des 7/8, 51–63.
25. Mason J. S., Pickett S. D. (1997) Partition-based selection Perspect Drug Discov Des 7/8, 85–114.
26. Rusinko, A. III, Farmen, M. W., Lambert, C. G. et al. (1999) Analysis of a large struc-ture/biological activity dataset using recursive partitioning. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 1017–1026.
27. Lajiness, M. S. (1997) Dissimilarity-based compound selection techniques. Perspect Drug Discov Des 7/8, 65–84.
28. Pickett, S. D., Luttman, C., Guerin, V., Laoui, A., James, E. (1998) DIVSEL and COMPLIB–strategies for the design and comparison of combinatorial libraries using pharmacophore descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38, 144–150.
29. Hansch, C., Hoekman, D., Gao, H. (1996) Comparative QSAR: toward a deeper understanding of chemicobiological interactions. Chem Rev 96, 1045–1074.
30. Jaffé, H. H. (1953) A reexamination of the Hammett equation. Chem Rev 53, 191–261.
31. Hammett, L. P. (1935) Some relations between reaction rates and equilibrium. Chem Rev 17, 125–136.
32. Hammett, L. P. (1937) The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. Benzene derivatives. J Am Chem Soc 59, 96–103.
33. Hansch, C., Maloney, P. P., Fujita, T., Muir, R. M. (1962) Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 194, 178–180.
34. Hansch, C. (1993) Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the unnamed science. Acc Chem Res 26, 147–153.
35. Livingstone, D. J. (2004) Building QSAR models: a practical guide, in (Cronin, M. T. D., Livingstone, D. J. eds.) Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004, pp. 151–170.
36. Walker, J. D., Dearden, J. C., Schultz, T. W., Jaworska, J., Comber M. H. I. (2003) in (Walker, J. D. ed.) QSARs for New Practitioners, in QSARs for Pollution Prevention, Toxicity Screening, Risk Assessment, and Web Applications. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, pp. 3–18.
37. Walker, J. D., Jaworska, J., Comber, M. H. I., Schultz, T. W., Dearden, J. C. (2003) Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure–activity relationships. Environ Toxicol Chem 22, 1653–1665.
38. Cronin, M. T. D., Schultz, T. W. (2003) Pitfalls in QSAR J Theoret Chem (Theochem) 622, 39–51.
39. OECD Principles for the Validation of (Q)SARs, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf, last accessed February, 2010.
40. Tropsha, A., Golbraikh, A. (2007) Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening. Curr Pharmaceut Design 13, 3494–3504.
41. Dearden, J. C., Cronin, M. T. D., Kaiser, K. L. E. (2009) How not to develop a quantitative structure-activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR). SAR and QSAR in Environ Res 20, 241–266.
42. Free, S. M., Wilson, J. W. (1964) A mathematical contribution to structure-activity studies. J Med Chem 7, 395–399.
43. a, and logD. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42, 796–805.
44. Lombardo, F., Obach, R. S., et al. (2006) A hybrid mixture discriminant analysis-random forest computational model for the prediction of volume of distribution of drugs in human. J Med Chem 49, 2262–2267.
45. Nicolaou, C. A., Brown, N., Pattichis, C. S. (2007) Molecular optimization using computational multi-objective methods Curr Opin Drug Discov Develop 10, 316–324.
46. Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Bradshaw, J., Green, D. V. S. (1999) Selecting combinatorial libraries to optimize diversity and physical properties. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 169–177.
47. Brown, R.D., Hassan, M., Waldman, M. (2000) Combinatorial library design for diversity, cost efficiency, and drug-like characters. J Mol Graph Model 18, 427–437.
48. Gillet, V. J., Khatib, W., Willett, P., Fleming, P. J., Green, D. V. S. (2002) Combinatorial library design using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42, 375–385.
49. Chen, G., Zheng, S., Luo, X., Shen, J., Zhu, W., Liu, H., Gui, C., Zhang, J., Zheng, M., Puah, C.M., Chen, K., Jiang, H. (2005) Focused combinatorial library design based on structural diversity, drug likeness and binding affinity score. J Comb Chem 7, 398–406.
50. Eichfelder, G. (2008) Adaptive Scalariza-tion Methods in Multiobjective Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
51. Abraham, A., Jain, L., Goldberg, R. (eds.) (2005) Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: Theoretical Advances and Applications, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
52. Van Veldhurizen, D. A., Lamont, G. B. (2000) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evol Comput 8, 125–147.
53. Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Bradshaw, J., Green, D. V. S. (1999) Selecting combinatorial libraries to optimize diversity and physical properties. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39, 169–177.
54. Zheng, W., Hung, S. T., Saunders, J. T., Seibel, G. L. (2000) PICCOLO: a tool for combinatorial library design via multicrite-rion optimization. Pac Symp Biocomput 5, 585–596.
55. A multi-endpoint optimization tool with a graphics user interface developed at Pfizer–La Jolla by Zhou, J. Z., Kong, X., Mattaparti, S, et al. (unpublished).
56. Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., Feeney, P. J. (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23, 3–25.
57. Gillet, V. J., Willett, P., Bradshaw, J. (1998) Identification of biological activity profiles using substructural analysis and genetic algorithms. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38, 165–179.
58. Walter, W. P., Stahl, M. T., Murcko, M. A. (1998) Virtual screening–an overview. Drug Discov Today 3, 160–178.
59. Bajorath, J. (2002) Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1, 882–894.
60. Reddy, A. S., Pati, S. P., Kumar, P. P., Pradeep, H. N., Sastry, G. N. (2007) Virtual screening in drug discovery–a computational perspective. Curr Prot Pept Sci 8, 329–351.
61. Klebe, G. (ed.) (2000) Virtual Screening: An Alternative or Complement to High Throughput Screening? Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
62. Alvarez, J., Shoichet, B. (ed.) (2005) Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, USA.
63. Varnek, A., Tropsha, A. (ed.) (2008) Chemoinformatics: An Approach to Virtual Screening, RSC, Cambridge, UK.
64. Rishton, G. M. (1997) Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS. Drug Discov Today 2, 382–384.
65. Walters, W. P., et al. (1998) Can we learn to distinguish between ‘druglike’ and ‘nondrug-like’ molecules? J Med Chem 41, 3314–3324.
66. Sadowski, J., Kubinyi, H. A. (1998) A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J Med Chem 41, 3325–3329.
67. Rishton, G. M. (2003) Nonleadlikeness and leadlikeness in biochemical screening. Drug Discov Today 8, 86–96.
68. http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/docs/3d_database/Structural_information/structural_data.html, last accessed February, 2010.
69. Kuntz, I. D. (1992) Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery. Science 257, 1078–1082.
70. Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R., Bajorath, J. (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3, 935–949.
71. Sun, H. (2008) Pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Curr Med Chem 15, 1018–1024.
72. Melville, J. L., Burke, E. K., Hirst, J. D. (2009) Machine learning in virtual screening. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening 12, 332–343.
73. Harper, G., Pickett, S. D., Green, D. V. S. (2004) Design of a compound screening collection for use in high throughput screening. Comb Chem High Throughput Screening 7, 63–70.
74. Schüller, A., Hähnke, V., Schneider, G. (2007) SmiLib v2.0: a Java-based tool for rapid combinatorial library enumeration QSAR. Comb Sci 26, 407–410.
75. Pipeline Pilot distributed by Accelrys Inc. can be used to enumerate libraries defined either by reactions or by Markush structures: http://accelrys.com/resource-center/case-studies/enumeration.html, last accessed February, 2010.
76. CombiLibMaker is software distributed by Tripos Inc.: http://tripos.com/data/SYBYL/combilibmaker_072505.pdf, last accessed February, 2010.
77. Yasri, A., Berthelot, D., Gijsen, H., Thielemans, T., Marichal, P., Engels, M., Hoflack, J. (2004) REALISIS: a medicinal chemistry-oriented reagent selection, library design, and profiling platform. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44, 2199–2206.
78. Peng, Z., Yang, B., Mattaparti, S., Shulok, T., Thacher, T., Kong, J., Kostrowicki, J., Hu, Q., Na, J., Zhou, J. Z., Klatte, K., Chao, B., Ito, S., Clark, J., Coner, C., Waller, C., Kuki, A. PGVL Hub: an integrated desktop tool for medicinal chemists to streamline design and synthesis of chemical libraries and singleton compounds, in (Zhou, J. Z., ed.) Chemical Library Design. Humana Press, New York, Chapter 15.
79. Truchon, J.-F. GLARE: a tool for product-oriented design of combinatorial libraries, in (Zhou, J. Z., ed.) Chemical Library Design. Humana Press, New York, Chapter 17.
80. Lam, T. H., Bernardo, P. H., Chai, C. L. L., Tong, J. C. CLEVER – a general design tool for combinatorial libraries, in (Zhou, J. Z., ed.) Chemical Library Design. Humana Press, New York, Chapter 18.
81. Shi, S., Peng, Z., Kostrowicki, J., Paderes, G., Kuki, A. (2000) Efficient combinatorial filtering for desired molecular properties of reaction products. J Mol Graph Model 18, 478–496.
82. Zhou, J. Z., Shi, S., Na, J., Peng, Z., Thacher, T. (2009) Combinatorial library-based design with basis products. J Comput Aided Mol Des 23, 725–736.
83. Grabowski, K., Baringhaus, K.-H., Schneider, G. (2008) Scaffold diversity of natural products: inspiration for combinatorial library design. Nat Prod Rep 25, 892–904.
84. Stocks, M. J., Wilden, G. R. H, Pairaudeau, G., Perry, M. W. D, Steele, J., Stone-hous, J. P. (2009) A practical method for targeted library design balancing lead-like properties with diversity. ChemMedChem 4, 800–808.
85. Hann, M. M., Leach, A. R., Harper, G. (2001) Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41, 856–864.
86. Gillet, V. J. (2002) Reactant-and product-based approaches to the design of combinatorial libraries. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:371–380.
87. Balakin, K. V., Ivanenkov, Y. A., Savchuk, N. P. (2009) Compound library design for targeted families, in (Jacoby, E. ed.) Chemogenomics. Humana Press, New York, pp 21–46.
88. Xi, H., Lunney, E. A. (2010) The design, annotation and application of a kinase-targeted-library, in (Zhou, J. Z. ed.) Chemical Library Design. Humana Press, New York, Chapter 14.