Would repeated consumption of sports drinks with different acidulants lead to hedonic adjustment?

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 340-345

  Kinnear, Marise ^a   De Kock, Henriëtte L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Acidulants; Preference; Repeated exposure; Sensory evaluation; Sports drinks

Indexed keywords

CITRUS LIMON;

EID: 79952193771     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berry S.K. Role of acidulants in food industry. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2001, 38(2):93-104.
2. Chung S.J., Vickers Z. Influence of sweetness on the sensory-specific satiety and long-term acceptability of tea. Food Quality & Preference 2007, 18:256-264.
3. Chung S.J., Vickers Z. Long-term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness. Food Quality & Preference 2007, 18:963-974.
4. De Kock, H. L., & Kinnear, M. (2003) Hedonic adaptation potential of food products. In Paper presented at the 5th Pangborn sensory symposium, 20-24 July 2003, Boston, USA.
5. Dember W.N. Stimulus complexity, motivation and emotion. The psychology of perception 1970, 341-375. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London. 2nd ed. J.S. Warm, W.N. Dember (Eds.).
6. Fowlds, R. W. R. (1998). The production of a food acid mixture containing fumaric acid. Patent application no: PCT/WO98/53705. Accessed: 2 Dec 2008. http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/patentsearch.
7. Frandsen L.W., Dijksterhuis G.B., Brockhoff P.B., Nielsen J.H., Martens M. Feelings as a basis for discrimination: Comparison of a modified authenticity test with the same-different test for slight different types of milk. Food Quality & Preference 2007, 18:97-105.
8. Giese J. Developments in beverage additives. Food Technology 1995, 21:64-72.
9. Green B.G., Shaffer G., Gilmore M.M. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ration properties. Chemical Senses 1993, 18:683-702.
10. Hetherington M.M., Bell A., Rolls B.J. Effect of repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake. British Food Journal 2000, 102(7):507-521.
11. Hetherington M.M., Pirie L.M., Nabb S. Stimulus satiation: Effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake. Appetite 2002, 38:19-28.
12. Horwitz W. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International 2002, AOAC International, Maryland, USA. 17th ed.
13. Hough G., Wakeling I., Mucci A., Chambers E., Gallardo I.M., Alves L.R. Number of consumers necessary for sensory acceptability tests. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:522-526.
14. Kinnear, M. (2008). Sensory perception of different acidulants in flavoured sports drinks. MSc Food Science thesis. University of Pretoria.
15. Köster E.P., Couronne T., Léon F., Lévy C., Marcelino A.S. Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurements: A conceptual exploration. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 14:165-176.
16. Köster E.P., Mojet J. Boredom and the reasons why some new food products fail. Consumer-led food product development 2007, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England. H. MacFie (Ed.).
17. Lanton B. Beyond citric acid. South African Food Review 2004, 31(4):13.
18. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 1998, Aspen Publications, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
19. Lévy C.M., Köster E.P. The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:185-200.
20. Luckow T., Seehan V., Delahunty C., Fitzgerald G. Determining the odour and flavour characteristics of probiotic, health-promoting ingredients and the effects of repeated exposure on consumer acceptance. Journal of Food Science 2005, 70(1):S53-S59.
21. Luckow T., Seehan V., Fitzgerald G., Delahunty C. Exposure, health information and flavour-masking strategies of probiotic juice. Appetite 2006, 47:315-323.
22. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 1982, 3:283-290.
23. Porcherot C., Issanchou S. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:21-29.
24. Resurreccion A.V.A. Consumer sensory testing for product development 1998, Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
25. Rubico S.M., McDaniel M.R. Sensory evaluation of acids by free-choice profiling. Chemical Senses 1992, 3:273-289.
26. Stallberg-White C., Pliner P. The effect of flavour principles on willingness to taste novel foods. Appetite 1999, 33:209-221.
27. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
28. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices 2004, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam. 3rd ed.
29. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:367-376.
30. Sulmont-Rossé C., Chabanet C., Issanchou S., Köster E.P. Impact of the arousal potential of uncommon drinks on repeated exposure effect. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:412-420.
31. Weijzen P.L.G., Zandstra E.H., Alfieri C., De Graaf C. Effects of complexity and intensity on sensory specific satiety and food acceptance after repeated consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:349-359.
32. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement 1968, 9:1-27.
33. Zandstra E.H., Weegels M.F., Van Spronsen A.A., Klerk M. Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:549-555.