Resource endowments and responses to regulatory pressure: Publications of economics, management, and political science departments of Turkish universities in indexed journals, 2000-2008

Higher Education

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 463-481

  Önder, Çetin ^a   Kasapoğlu Önder, Rana ^b  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Economics; Evaluation; Management; Political science; Research; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952107187     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9341-7     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alatas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51, 599-613.
2. Allen, S. D., Link, A. N., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2007). Entrepreneurship and human capital: Evidence of patenting activity from the academic sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 937-951.
3. Benner, M., & Sandström, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29, 291-301.
4. Bordons, M., Fernández, M. T., & Gómez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53, 195-206.
5. Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1999). The efficacy of different modes of funding research: Perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences. Research Policy, 28, 488-499.
6. Boyacigiller, N., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy Management Review, 16, 262-290.
7. Buchmueller, T. C., Dominitz, J., & Hansen, W. L. (1999). Graduate training and the early career productivity of Ph. D. economists. Economics of Education Review, 14, 65-77.
8. Butler, L. (2003). Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas. Research Evaluation, 12, 39-46.
9. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Eden, D., & Rynes, S. (2003). Publishing across borders: Furthering the internationalization of AMJ. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 679-683.
11. Erden, Z. (2006). Histories, institutional regimes and educational organizations: The case of Turkish higher education. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Sabanci{dotless} University, Istanbul.
12. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
13. Feldman, M. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15, 295-309.
14. Filippakou, O., Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (2010). Compliance, resistance and seduction: Reflections on 20 years of the funding council model of governance. Higher Education. doi: 10. 1007/s10734-010-9314-x.
15. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (232-263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Geuna, A., & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41, 277-304.
17. Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36, 1035-1051.
18. Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioǧlu, Ö. A., & Yurtsever, E. (2002). Turkey's output in social science publications: 1970-1999. Scientometrics, 55, 103-121.
19. Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39, 67-91.
20. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
21. Hicks, D. (2009). Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation. Higher Education, 57, 393-404.
22. Jimenez-Contreras, E., Anegon, F. M., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain. The impact of the National Commission for the evaluation of research activity. Research Policy, 32, 123-142.
23. Keyder, Ç. (1987). State and class in Turkey: A study in capitalist development. London: Verso.
24. Kirkman, B. L., & Law, K. S. K. (2005). International management research in AMJ: Our past, present, and future. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 377-386.
25. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 632-657.
26. Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333-363.
27. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
28. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289-307.
29. Luukkonen, T. (2002). Reseatch evaluation in Europe: State of the art. Research Evaluation, 11, 81-84.
30. Lynch, R., & Baines, P. (2004). Strategy development in UK higher education: Towards resource-based competitive advantages. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26, 171-187.
31. Mahony, D. (1994). The "new mutuality" in Australian higher education-a national case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 123-146.
32. Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Viva la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799-820.
33. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
34. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2009). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750-770.
35. Moed, H. F. (2008). UK Research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 74, 153-161.
36. Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66, 81-100.
37. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Önder, Ç., Şevkli, M., Alti{dotless}nok, T., & Tavukçuoǧlu, C. (2008). Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey's recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76, 543-560.
39. OSYM. (2001). 2000-2001 öǧretim yi{dotless}li{dotless} yükseköǧretim istatistikleri kitabi{dotless} [Handbook of higher education statistics, 2000-2001]. Ankara: OSYM.
40. OSYM. (2008). 2007-2008 öǧretim yi{dotless}li{dotless} yükseköǧretim istatistikleri kitabi{dotless} [Handbook of higher education statistics, 2007-2008]. Ankara: OSYM.
41. OSYM. (2009). 2008-2009 öǧretim yi{dotless}li{dotless} yükseköǧretim istatistikleri kitabi{dotless} [Handbook of higher education statistics, 2008-2009]. Ankara: OSYM.
42. Powers, J. B. (2003). Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 26-50.
43. Reidpath, D. D., & Allotey, P. (2010). Can national research assessment exercises be used locally to inform research strategy development? The description of a methodological approach to the UK RAE 2008 results with a focus on one institution. Higher Education, 59, 785-797.
44. Sarrico, C. S., Rosa, M. J., Teixeira, P. N., & Cardoso, M. F. (2010). Assessing quality and evaluating performance in higher education: Worlds apart or complementary views? Minerva, 48, 35-54.
45. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
48. SPSS Inc. (2007). SPSS base 16. 0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
49. STATA Corp. (2005). STATA base reference manual (Release 9). College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
50. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, E. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
51. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, S. K. Andersen, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. R. (2003). Using publications counts to measure an institution's research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44, 121-148.
53. Üsdiken, B., & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Preaching, teaching, and researching at the periphery: Academic management literature in Turkey, 1970-1999. Organization Studies, 30, 1063-1082.
54. Uzun, A. (1998). A scientometric profile of social sciences research in Turkey. International Information and Library Review, 30, 169-184.
55. van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66, 133-154.
56. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62, 117-131.
57. YÖK (2005). 2005 yi{dotless}li{dotless} yayi{dotless}n istatistikleri [2005 publications statistics]. Ankara: Yükseköǧretim Kurulu. http://www. yok. gov. tr/en/content/view/755/. Accessed 15 September 2009.
58. YÖK (2006). 2006 yi{dotless}li{dotless} yayi{dotless}n istatistikleri [2006 publications statistics]. Ankara: Yükseköǧretim Kurulu. http://www. yok. gov. tr/en/content/view/634/. Accessed 15 September 2009.
59. YÖK (2007a). Türkiye'nin yükseköǧretim stratejisi [Higher education strategy of Turkey]. Ankara: Yükseköǧretim Kurulu.
60. YÖK (2007b). 2007 yi{dotless}li{dotless} yayi{dotless}n istatistikleri [2007 publications statistics]. Ankara: Yükseköǧretim Kurulu. http://www. yok. gov. tr/en/content/view/684/. Accessed 15 September 2009.
61. YÖK (2008). 2008 yi{dotless}li{dotless} yayi{dotless}n istatistikleri [2008 publications statistics]. Ankara: Yükseköǧretim Kurulu. http://www. yok. gov. tr/en/content/view/320/118/. Accessed 15 September 2009.
62. Youn, T. I. K., & Price, T. M. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 204-237.