The efficacy of different modes of funding research: Perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences

Research Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 489-499

  Bourke, Paul ^a   Butler, Linda ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Biological sciences; Funding; Research appointment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012401876     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00009-8     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bourke, P., 1997. Evaluating University Research: The British Research Assessment Exercise and Australian Practice. Commissioned Report No. 56, National Board of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS, Canberra.
2. Bourke, P., Butler, L., 1993. A Crisis for Australian Science? Monograph Series No. 1, Performance Indicators Project, The Australian National University, Canberra.
3. Butler, L., Bourke, P., Biglia, B., 1997. CSIRO: Profile of Basic Research. Research Evaluation and Policy Project Monograph Series No. 4, The Australian National University, Canberra.
4. Butler, L., Bourke, P., Biglia, B., 1999. A Bibliometric Analysis of Biological Sciences Research in Australia. Forthcoming.
5. Jeschin, D., Lewison, G., Anderson, J., 1995. A bibliometric database for tracking acknowledgments of research funding. In: Koenig, M., Bookstein, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Learned Information, Medford, NJ.
6. Martin, B.R., 1994. British science in the 1980s - has the relative decline continued?. Scientometrics 29, 27-56.
7. Narin, F., 1976. Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Computer Horizons Inc., NJ.