Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences

Current Sociology

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 599-613

  Alatas, Syed Farid ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844460599     PISSN: 00113921     EISSN: 14617064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00113921030516003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ALATAS, Syed Farid (1998) ‘The Rhetorics of Social Science in Developing Societies’, CAS Research Papers Series No 1. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.
2. ALATAS, Syed Farid (1999) ‘Colonization of the Social Sciences and the Structure of Academic Dependency’, Replika (Budapest) 38: 163-179 (in Hungarian).
3. ALATAS, Syed Farid (2000a) ‘Academic Dependency in the Social Sciences: Reflections on India and Malaysia’, American Studies International 38(2): 80-96.
4. ALATAS, Syed Farid (2000b) ‘An Introduction to the Idea of Alternative Discourses’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 28(1): 1-12.
5. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1969) ‘Academic Imperialism’, Lecture delivered to the History Society, University of Singapore, 26 September.
6. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1972) ‘The Captive Mind in Development Studies’, International Social Science Journal 34(1): 9-25.
7. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1974) ‘The Captive Mind and Creative Development,” International Social Science Journal 36(4): 691-699.
8. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1978) ‘Social Aspects of Endogenous Intellectual Creativity: The Problem of Obstacles-Guidelines for Research’, Working Paper for Project on Socio-Cultural Development Alternatives in a Changing World, United Nations University, pp. 1-9.
9. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (1979) ‘Towards an Asian Social Science Tradition’, New Quest 17: 265-269.
10. ALATAS, Syed Hussein (2000) ‘Intellectual Imperialism: Definition, Traits and Problems’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 28(1): 23-45.
11. AL-E AHMAD, Jalal (n.d.) Gharbzadegi (Weststruckness). Tehran: Ravaq Press.
12. ALTBACH, Philip G. (1975) ‘Literary Colonialism: Books in the Third World’, Harvard Educational Review 45: 226-236.
13. ALTBACH, Philip G. (1977) ‘Servitude of the Mind? Education, Dependency, and Neocolonialism’, Teachers College Record 79(2): 187-204.
14. AMIN, Samir (1979) Eurocentrism. London: Zed Books.
15. ATAL, Yogesh (1981) ‘The Call For Indigenization’, International Social Science Journal 43(1): 189-197.
16. CÉSAIRE, Aimé (1955) Discours sur le colonialisme. Paris: Editions Présence Africaine.
17. CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh (1992) ‘Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for ‘Indian” Pasts?’, Representations 37: 1-26.
18. DE MORGA, Antonio (1962) Historical Events of the Philippine Islands by Dr Antonio de Morga, Published in Mexico in 1609, Recently Brought to Light and Annotated by José Rizal, Preceded by a Prologue by Dr Ferdinand Blumentritt, Writings of José Rizal Volume VI Manila: National Historical Institute. (Orig. pub. 1890.)
19. DOS SANTOS, Theotonio (1968) ‘La crisis de la teoria del desarrollo y las relaciones de dependencia en América Latina’, Boletín del CESO 3.
20. DOS SANTOS, Theotonio (1970) ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review 60.
21. AHIM, Hussein (1970) ‘Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries’, Current Anthropology 20(2): 397-397.
22. FAHIM, Hussein and HELMER, Katherine (1980) ‘Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries: A Further Elaboration’, Current Anthropology 21(5): 644-650.
23. FANON, Frantz (1961) Les Damnés de la terre. Paris: François Maspero éditeur.
24. FREIRE, Paulo (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
25. GARREAU, Frederick H. (1985) ‘The Multinational Version of Social Science with Emphasis Upon the Discipline of Sociology’, Current Sociology 33(3): 1-169.
26. GARREAU, Frederick H. (1988) ‘Another Type of Third World Dependency: The Social Sciences’, International Sociology 3(2): 171-178.
27. GARREAU, Frederick H. (1991) The Political Economy of the Social Sciences. New York: Garland Publishing.
28. HOROWITZ, Irving Louis, ed. (1967) The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot: Studies in the Relationship Between Social Science and Practical Politics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
29. ILLICH, Ivan D. (1973) Deschooling Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
30. KUWAYAMA, Takami (1997) ‘Native Anthropologists: With Special Reference to Japanese Studies Inside and Outside Japan’, Japan Anthropology Workshop Newsletter 26-7 September: 52-56.
31. LENGYEL, Peter (1986) International Social Science: The UNESCO Experience. New Brunswick, NJ and Oxford: Transaction Books.
32. LIE, John (1996) ‘Sociology of Contemporary Japan’, Trend Report, Current Sociology 44(1): 1-101.
33. MEMMI, Albert (1957) Portrait du Colonisé précédé du Portrait du Colonisateur. Paris: Editions Buchet/Chastel.
34. PRAKASH, Gyan (1990) ‘Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 32(2): 383-408.
35. PRAKASH, Gyan (1992) ‘Postcolonialism and Indian Historiography’, Social Text 10(31-32): 8-19.
36. RAHMAN, Abdur (1983) Intellectual Colonisation: Science and Technology in West—East Relations. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
37. RIZAL, José (1962) ‘To the Filipinos’, in Historical Events of the Philippine Islands by Dr Antonio de Morga, Published in Mexico in 1609, Recently Brought to Light and Annotated by José Rizal, Preceded by a Prologue by Dr Ferdinand Blumentritt, Writings of José Rizal Volume VI. Manila: National Historical Institute. (Orig. pub. 1890.)
38. SAID, Edward (1979) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
39. SAID, Edward (1993) Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto and Windus.
40. SARKAR, Benoy Kumar (1985) The Positive Background of Hindu Sociology. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. (Orig. pub. 1937.)
41. VON GIZYCKI, Rainald (1973) ‘Centre and Periphery in the International Scientific Community: Germany, France and Great Britain in the 19th Century’, Minerva 11(4): 474—494.
42. WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel (1996) ‘Eurocentrism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science paper presented at the East Asian Regional Colloquium on The Future of Sociology in East Asia, jointly organized by the Korean Sociological Association and the International Sociological Association, 22—23 November.