Web-enabled video-feedback: A method to reflect on the communication skills of experienced physicians

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 335-340

  Noordman, Janneke ^a   Verhaak, Peter ^a   van Dulmen, Sandra ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Communication; Continuing medical education; Physicians; Video feedback method; Web enabled link

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONSULTATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TELEPHONE; VIDEORECORDING; WEB BROWSER;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERNET; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 79951948657     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Davis D.A., Thomson M.A., Oxman A.D., Haynes R.B. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. J Amer Med Assoc 1995, 274:700-705.
2. Davis D.A., Thomson O'Brien M.A., Freemantle N, Wolf F.M., Mazmanian P., Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing medical education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. J Amer Med Assoc 1999, 282:867-874.
3. Pérez-Cuevas R., Reyes H., Guiscafré, Juárez-Díaz N., Oviedo M., Flores S., Muñoz O. The primary care clinic as a setting for continuing medical education: program description. Can Med Assoc J 2000, 163:1295-1299.
4. Holm H.A. Quality issues in continuing medical education. Brit Med J 1998, 316:621-624.
5. Hulsman R.L., Ros W.J.G., Winnubst J.A.M., Bensing J.M. Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills a review of evaluation studies. Med Educ 1999, 33:55-58.
6. Aspegren K. BEME Guide no 2: teaching and learning communication skills in medicine - a review with quality grading of articles. Med Teach 1999, 21:563-570.
7. Roter D.L., Larson S., Shinitzky H., Chernoff R., Serwint J.R., Adamo G., Wissow L. Use of an innovative video feedback technique to enhance communication skills training. Med Educ 2004, 38:145-147.
8. Choudhry N.K., Fletcher R.H., Soumerai S.B. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med 2005, 142:260-263.
9. Kramer A.W.M., Dusman H., Tan L.H.C., Jansen J.J.M., Grol R.P.T.M., Vleuten C.P.M., et al. Acquisition of communication skills in postgraduate training for general practice. Med Educ 2004, 38:158-167.
10. Bensing J.M., Tromp F., van Dulmen S., van den Brink-Muinen A., Verheul W., Schellevis F.G. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Fam Pract 2006, 7:1-7.
11. Yedidia M.J., Gillespie C.C., Kachur E., Schwarz M.D., Ockene J., Chepaitis A.E., et al. Effect of communication training on medical student performance. J Amer Med Assoc 2003, 290:1157-1165.
12. Van de Ridder J.M., Stokking K.M., McGaghie W.C., ten Cate O., Th J. What is feedback in clinical education?. Med Educ 2008, 42:189-197.
13. Veloski J., Boex J.R., Grasberger M.J., Evans A., Wolfson D.B. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No.7. Med Teach 2006, 28:117-118.
14. Ozcakar N., Mevsim V., Guldal D., Gunvar T., Yildirim E., Sisli Z., et al. Is the use of videotape recording superior to verbal feedback alone in the teaching of clinical skills?. BMC Public Health 2009, 9:1-5.
15. Nilsen S., Baerheim A. Feedback on video recorded consultations in medical teaching: why students loathe and love it- a focus-group based qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2005, 5:1-6.
16. Coleman T. Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Pract 2000, 17:422-427.
17. Kemper K.J., Foy J.M., Wissow L., Shore S. Enhancing communication skills for pediatric visits through on-line training using video demonstrations. BMC Med Educ 2008, 8:1-8.
18. Cegala D.J., Lenzmeier Broz S. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ 2002, 36:1004-1006.
19. Hobma S., Ram P., Muijtjens A., van der Vleuten C., Grol R. Effective improvement of doctor-patient communication: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2006, 580-586.
20. Langewitz W.A., Eich P., Kiss A., Wössmer B. Improving communication skills - a randomized controlled behaviorally oriented intervention study for residents in internal medicine. Psychosom Med 1998, 60:268-276.
21. Smith R.C., Lyles J.S., Mettler J., Stoffelmayr B.E., van Egeren L.F., Marshall A.A., et al. The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. Ann Intern Med 1998, 128:118-126.
22. Makoul G. Essential Elements of communication in medical encounters: The Kalamazoo consensus statement participants in the bayer-fetzer conference on physician-patient communication in medical education. Acad Med 2001, 76:390-393.
23. Stein T.S., Kwan J. Thriving in a busy practice: physician-patient communication training. ACP: Eff Clin Pract 1999, http://www.acponline.org/ clinical_information/journals_publications/ecp/marapr99/thriving.htm.
24. Wensing M., Vingerhoets E., Grol R. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement?. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 51:149-153.
25. Wensing M., Grol R., van Weel C., Felling A. Quality assessment by using patients' evaluations of care. Eur J Gen Pract 1998, 4:150-153.
26. Paxton E.S., Hamilton B.H., Boyd V.R., Hall B.L. Impact of isolated clinical performance feedback on clinical productivity of an academic surgery faculty. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 202:267-268.
27. Noordman J., Verhaak P., van Beljouw I., van Dulmen S. Consulting room computers and their effect on general practitioner-patient communication: comparing two periods of computer use. Fam Pract 2010, 27:644-651.
28. Brink-Muinen van denA., van Dulmen A.M., de Haes J.C.J.M., Visser APh, Schellevis F.G., Bensing J.M. Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?. Health Expect 2006, 9:333-342.
29. Brink-Muinen van denA., van Dulmen A.M., Jung H.P., Bensing J.M. Do our talks with patients meet their expectations?. J Fam Pract 2007, 56:559-568.
30. Verheij R.A., van Dijk C.E., Abrahamse H., Davids R., van den Hoogen H., Braspenning J., van Althuis T. Landelijk Informatienetwerk Huisartsenzorg. Feiten en cijfers over huisartsenzorg in Nederland 2009, NIVEL/IQ, Utrecht/Nijmegen, http://www.linh.nl (20-05-2010).
31. Roter D., Larson S. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 46:233-234.
32. Milder I.E.J., Blokstra A., de Groot J., van Dulmen S., Bemelmans W.J.E. Lifestyle counseling in hypertension-related visits - analysis of video-taped general practice visits. BMC Fam Pract 2008, 9:1-8.
33. Noordman J., Verhaak P., van Dulmen S. Discussing patient's lifestyle choices in the consulting room: analysis of GP-patient consultations between 1975 and 2008. BMC Fam Pract 2010, 11:1-10.
34. Stemler S.E. A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Pract Assess Res Eval 2004, 9. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp%3Fv=9%26n=4.
35. Sim J., Wright C.C. The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005, 85:257-258.
36. Bensing J., van Dulmen S., Tates K. Communication in context: new directions in communication research. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 50:27-32.