Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: A study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 7, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bensing, Jozien M ^a,b   Tromp, Fred ^c   Van Dulmen, Sandra ^a   Van Den Brink Muinen, Atie ^a   Verheul, William ^a   Schellevis, François G ^a,d  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EXPECTATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SEX DIFFERENCE; VIDEOTAPE; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; TRENDS; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMMUNICATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 33750625293     PISSN: 14712296     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-62     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bensing J: Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2000, 39:17-25.
2. Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, Prideaux D: Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001, 357:699-703.
3. McWhinney IR: Primary care: core values. Core values in a changing world. BMJ 1998, 316:1807-1809.
4. Smith R: All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ 1998, 316:1917-1918.
5. Gask L, Usherwood T: ABC of psychological medicine. The consultation. BMJ 2002, 324:1567-1569.
6. Elwyn G: Shared decision making. Patient involvement in clinical practice PhD thesis. University of Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2001.
7. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692.
8. Roter DL, Hall JA: Doctors talking to patients, patients talking to doctors Connecticut, Auburn House; 1993.
9. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin MJ, Stiles W, Inui TS: Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA 1997, 277:350-356.
10. Robinson A, Thomson R: Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 2001, 10 Suppl 1:i34-i38.
11. Robinson JD: An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients' participation. Health Commun 2003, 15:27-57.
12. Brink-Muinen A, Bensing JM, Kerssens JJ: Gender and communication style in general practice. Differences between women's health care and regular health care. Med Care 1998, 36:100-106.
13. Ishikawa H, Takayama T, Yamazaki Y, Seki Y, Katsumata N, Aoki Y: The interaction between physician and patient communication behaviors in Japanese cancer consultations and the influence of personal and consultation characteristics. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 46:277-285.
14. Roter DL: Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr 1977, 5:281-315.
15. van Dulmen AM, Bensing JM: Gender differences in gynecologist communication. Women Health 2000, 30:49-61.
16. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M: Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med 1998, 24:81-88.
17. Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R: When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract 2001, 50:1057-1062.
18. Ong LM, Visser MR, van Zuuren FJ, Rietbroek RC, Lammes FB, de Haes JC: Cancer patients' coping styles and doctor-patient communication. Psychooncology 1999, 8:155-166.
19. Bradley JG, Zia MJ, Hamilton N: Patient preferences for control in medical decision making: a scenario-based approach. Fam Med 1996, 28:496-501.
20. Degner LF, Sloan JA: Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:941-950.
21. Kinnersley P, Stott N, Peters TJ, Harvey I: The patient-centredness of consultations and outcome in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:711-716.
22. Mead N, Bower P: Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:1087-1110.
23. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR: Patient-centred medicine transforming the clinical method Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.
24. Stewart M: Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ 2001, 322:444-445.
25. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Middleton E, Reeves D: Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study. BMJ 2005, 331:1121.
26. Reid CM, Ryan P, Miles H, Willson K, Beilin LJ, Brown MA, Jennings GL, Johnston CI, Macdonald GJ, Marley JE, McNeil JJ, Morgan TO, West MJ, Wing LM: Who's really hypertensive? - Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials. Blood Press 2005, 14:133-138.
27. The Task of Medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg Edited by: White KL. Menlo Park, The Henry Kaiser Foundation; 1988.
28. Bensing JM: Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Utrecht/Rotterdam, NIVEL; 1991.
29. Bensing JM, Dronkers J: Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care 1992, 30:283-298.
30. Bensing JM, Roter DL, Hulsman RL: Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:335-342.
31. Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen AM, de Haes JC, Visser A, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM: Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Health Expectations 2006.
32. Ong LM, Visser MR, Kruyver IP, Bensing JM, Brink-Muinen A, Stouthard JM, Lammes FB, de Haes JC: The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in oncological consultations: psychometric properties. Psychooncology 1998, 7:387-401.
33. Roter D, Larson S: The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 46:243-251.
34. Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR: Relations between physicians' behaviors and analogue patients' satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care 1987, 25:437-451.
35. Roter DL: The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis. (unpublished manual). Baltimore; 1987.
36. Roter DL: The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis (unpublished manual) Baltimore; 1993.
37. Rasbash J, Steele F, Browne W, Prosser B: A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0 University of Bristol; 2005.
38. Engel GL: How much longer must medicine's science be bound by a seventeenth century world view. In The task of medicine: dialogue at Wickenburg Edited by: White K. Menlo Park, The Henry Kaiser Foundation; 1988:113-116.
39. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P: Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:477-482.
40. Stewart MA: Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995, 152:1423-1433.
41. Sims J: What influences a patient's desire to participate in the management of their hypertension? Patient Educ Couns 1999, 38:185-194.
42. Markt voor informatief medisch en voedingskundig televisie-programma: Mening van de Nederlandse Bevolking. NIPO; 1999.
43. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barber N: Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ 2000, 320:1246-1250.
44. Coulter A, Peto V, Doll H: Patients' preferences and general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of menstrual disorders. Fam Pract 1994, 11:67-74.
45. Whitcomb ME: Communication and professionalism. Patient Educ Couns 2000, 41:137-144.
46. Lang F, Floyd MR, Beine KL: Clues to patients' explanations and concerns about their illnesses. A call for active listening. Arch Fam Med 2000, 9:222-227.
47. Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S: Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 61:134-141.