Learning by Reviewing

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 73-84

  Cho, Kwangsu ^a   MacArthur, Charles ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

ACCEL; Learning to write; SWoRD; Writing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951779106     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021950     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bartlett E.J. Learning to write: Some cognitive and linguistic components 1981, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
2. Bazerman C., Rogers P. Writing and secular knowledge apart from modern European institutions. Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text 2008, 172-188. Erlbaum, New York, NY. C. Bazerman (Ed.).
3. Beach R., Friedrich T. Response to writing. Handbook of writing research 2006, 222-234. Guilford Press, New York, NY. C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.).
4. Bereiter C., Scardamalia M. The psychology of written composition 1987, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Bracewell, R. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1978, March). The development of audience awareness in writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada. Retrieved from ERIC database. (154433).
6. Butterfield E.C., Hacker D.J., Albertson L.R. Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review 1996, 8(3):239-297. doi: 10.1007/BF01464075.
7. Chi M.T.H., de Leeuw N., Chiu M.-H., LaVancher C. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 1994, 18(3):439-477.
8. Cho K., Cho M., Hacker D.J. Self-monitoring support for learning to write. Interactive Learning Environments 2010, 18(2):101-113. doi: 10.1080/10494820802292386.
9. Cho K., Schunn C.D. Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education 2007, 48(3):409-426. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004.
10. Cho K., Schunn C.D., Charney D. Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication 2006, 23(3):260-294. doi: 10.1177/0741088306289261.
11. Cho K., Schunn C.D., Wilson R.W. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98(4):891-901. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891.
12. Cho Y.H., Cho K. Peer reviewers learning from giving comments. Instructional Science 2010, Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
13. Cohen E.G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 1994, 64(1):1-35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001.
14. Coleman E.B., Brown A.L., Rivkin I.D. The effect of instructional explanations on formal learning from scientific texts. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1997, 6(4):347-365. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0604_1.
15. Coleman L.M., Jussim L., Issac J.L. Black students' reactions to feedback conveyed by White and Black teachers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1991, 21(6):460-481. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00531.x.
16. Conner A.M., Moulton M.R. Motivating middle school students to revise and edit. English Journal 2000, 90(1):72-79. doi: 10.2307/821735.
17. Couzijn M. Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction 1999, 9(2):109-142. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00040-1.
18. Fitzgerald J. Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research 1987, 57(4):481-506.
19. Flower L., Hayes J.R., Carey L., Schriver K., Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 1986, 37(1):16-55. doi: 10.2307/357381.
20. Gearhart M., Wolf S.A. Engaging teachers in assessment of their students' narrative writing: The role of subject matter knowledge. Assessing Writing 1994, 1(1):67-90. doi: 10.1016/1075-2935(94)90005-1.
21. Graham S., Perin D. A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99(3):445-476. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445.
22. Haswell R.H. NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship. Written Communication 2005, 22(2):198-223. doi: 10.1177/0741088305275367.
23. Haswell R.H. Teaching of writing in higher education. Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text 2008, 405-424. Erlbaum, New York, NY. C. Bazerman (Ed.).
24. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
25. Hayes J.R. What triggers revision?. Studies in Writing: Vol. 13. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes 2004, 9-20. Kluwer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, P. Largy (Eds.).
26. Hayes J.R., Flower L., Schriver K., Stratman J., Carey L. Cognitive approaches in revision. Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language processing 1987, 176-240. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. S. Rosenberg (Ed.).
27. Hillocks G. Research on written composition: New directions for teaching 1986, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
28. Holliway D.R. Through the eyes of my reader: A strategy for improving audience perspective in children's descriptive writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 2004, 18(4):334-349. doi: 10.1080/02568540409595045.
29. Holliway D.R., McCutchen D. Audience perspective in young writers' composing and revision: Reading as the reader. Studies in Writing: Vol. 13. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes 2004, 87-101. Kluwer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, P. Largy (Eds.).
30. Klein P.D. Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review 1999, 11(3):203-270. doi: 10.1023/A:1021913217147.
31. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119(2):254-284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
32. Kulik J.A., Kulik C.C. Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research 1988, 58(1):79-97. doi: 10.2307/1170349.
33. MacArthur C.A., Graham S., Harris K.R. Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers. Studies in Writing. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes 2004, 13:125-137. Kluwer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, P. Largy (Eds.).
34. MacArthur C.A., Graham S., Schwartz S. Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly 1991, 14(1):61-73. doi: 10.2307/1510373.
35. Midgette E., Haria P., MacArthur C. The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students. Reading and Writing 2008, 21(1-2):131-151. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9.
36. The neglected " R": The need for a writing revolution 2003, National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges, College Entrance Examination Board, New York, NY.
37. Peterson P.L., Wilkinson L.C., Spinelli F., Swing S.R. Merging the process-product and the sociolinguistic paradigms: Research on small-group processes. The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes 1984, 126-152. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. P.L. Peterson, L.C. Wilkinson, M. Hallinan (Eds.).
38. Redd-Boyd T.M., Slater W.H. The effects of audience specification on undergraduates' attitudes, strategies, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English 1989, 32(1):77-108.
39. Roscoe R.D., Chi M.T.H. Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science 2008, 36(4):321-350. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5.
40. Rushton C., Ramsey P., Rada R. Peer assessment in a collaborative hypermedia environment: A case study. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 1993, 20(3):75-80.
41. Sambell K., McDowell L. The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1998, 23(4):391-402. doi: 10.1080/0260293980230406.
42. Schriver K.A. Evaluating text quality: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods (Tech. Rep. No. 41) 1990, National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, Berkeley, CA.
43. Shanahan T., Shanahan C. Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Education Review 2008, 78(1):40-59.
44. Siegler R.S. How does change occur: Microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology 1995, 28(3):225-273. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1006.
45. Sluijsmans D.M.A., Moerkerke G., Dochy F., Van Merriënboer J. Peer assessment in problem-based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 2001, 27(2):153-173. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00019-0.
46. Stefani L.A.J. Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education 1994, 19(1):69-75. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382153.
47. Swaney J.H., Janik C.J., Bond S.J., Hayes J.R. Editing for comprehension: Improving the process through reading protocols (Document Design Project Report No. 14) 1981, Carnegie Mellon University, Communications Design Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
48. Swanson D.B., Case S.M., van der Vlueten C.P.M. Strategies for student assessment. The challenge of problem-based learning 1991, 260-273. Kogan Page, London, England. D. Boud, G. Feletti (Eds.).
49. Traxler M.J., Gernsbacher M.A. Improving written communication through minimal feedback. Language and Cognitive Processes 1992, 7(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/01690969208409378.
50. Traxler M.J., Gernsbacher M.A. Improving written communication through perspective-taking. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8(3):311-334. doi: 10.1080/01690969308406958.
51. Wong B.Y., Wong R., Blenkinsop J. Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly 1989, 12(4):300-322. doi: 10.2307/1510212.
52. Wyngaard S., Gehrke R. Responding to audience: Using rubrics to teach and assess writing. English Journal 1996, 85(6):67-70. doi: 10.2307/819830.
53. Zellermayer M. The study of teachers' written feedback to students' writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science 1989, 18(2):145-165. doi: 10.1007/BF00117715.