Self-monitoring support for learning to write

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 101-113

  Cho, Kwangsu ^a   Cho, Moon Heum ^b   Hacker, Douglas J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

CSCL; Peer evaluation; Peer review; References; Self evaluation; Self monitoring; Sword; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952560026     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820802292386     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
3. Bracewell, R., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1978). The development of audience awareness in writing. Resources in Education, 154-433.
4. Butler, D.L., & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
5. Butterfield, E.C., Hacker, D.J., & Plumb, C. (1994). Topic knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and revision skill as determinants of text revision. In E.C. Butterfield (Ed.), Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
6. Cho, K., & Schunn, C.D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426.
7. Cho, K., Schunn, C.D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23, 260-294.
8. Cho, K., Schunn, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901.
9. Cresswell, A. (2000). Self-monitoring in student writing: Developing learner responsibility. ELT Journal, 54(3), 235-244.
10. Faigley, L., & Witte, S.P. (1983). Topical focus in technical writing. In P.V. Anderson, R.J. Brockman & C.R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 59-68). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
12. Gearhart, M., & Wolf, S.A. (1994). Engaging teachers in assessment of their students' narrative writing: The role of subject matter knowledge. Assessing Writing, 1(1), 67-90.
13. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1993). Self-regulated strategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 169-182.
14. Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3-12.
15. Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241.
16. Hacker, D.J. (1994). Comprehension monitoring as a writing process. In E.C. Butterfield (Ed.), Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
17. Hacker, D.J., Plumb, C., Butterfield, E.C., Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65-78.
18. Hayes, J.R., & Flower, L.S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L.W. Gregg & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Herrington, A.J., & Gadman, D. (1991). Peer review and revising in an anthropology course: Lessons for learning. College Composition and Communication, 42, 184-199.
20. Hull, G. (1987). The editing process in writing: A performance study of more skilled and less skilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 8-29.
21. Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
22. Marcoulides, G.A., & Simkin, M.G. (1991). Evaluating student papers: The case for peer review. Journal of Education for Business, 67, 80-83.
23. McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D.T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 153-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. National Commission on Writing (2003). The neglected 'R': The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.writingcommission.org/report.html
25. National Commission on Writing (2004). Writing: A ticket to work or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-to-work.pdf
26. Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
27. Reder, L.M., & Schunn, C.D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L.M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Schacter, D.L., Bowers, J., & Booker, J. (1989). Intention, awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J.C. Dunn & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Shaw, V.N. (2002). Peer review as a motivating device in the training of writing skills for college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33, 68-76.
30. Shimamura, A.P. (1996). The role of the prefrontal cortex in controlling and monitoring memory processes. In L.M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 259-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Simon, H.A. (1996). Closing remarks. In L.M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 339-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Sommers, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced audit writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(4), 378-388.
33. Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
34. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in college and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
35. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Winne, P.H., & Hadwin, A.F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D.J. Hacker, J. n Dunlosky & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). NJ: LEA.
37. Xing, W. (2004). Encouraging self-monitoring in writing by Chinese students. ELT Journal, 58(3), 238-246.
38. Zimmerman, B., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: APA.
39. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241-250.
40. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 94(4), 660668.
41. Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.