An examination of the relation of nonsense word fluency initial status and gains to reading outcomes for beginning readers

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 631-653

  Fien, Hank ^a   Park, Yonghan ^a   Baker, Scott K ^a   Smith, Jean L Mercier ^a   Stoolmiller, Mike ^a   Kame'enui, Edward J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951589421     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Baker, D. L. (2010). Robust reading instruction in the early grades: Conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of tier 1 and tier 2 instructional supports. Focus on Exceptionality, 42, 1-20.
3. Baker, S. K., Smith, J. L., Smolkowski, K., Fien, H., Kame'enui, E. J., & Thomas-Beck, C. (in press). The impact of Oregon Reading First on student reading outcomes. Elementary School Journal.
4. Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J., Kame'enui, E. J., et al. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low performing high poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37.
5. Batsche, G., Elliot, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
6. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542-551.
7. Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163-176.
8. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York: The Viking Press.
9. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383-417). New York: Longman.
10. Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. M., Kame'enui, E. J., & Thomas-Beck, C. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to measure reading proficiency in K-2 for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37, 391-408.
11. Fien, H., Kame'enui, E. J., & Good, R. H. (2009). School engaged in school-wide reading reform: An examination of the school and individual student predictors of early reading outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 1-25.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. J., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7-21.
13. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J. A., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14. Gersten, R., Dimino, J. A. (2006). RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99-108. (Pubitemid 43188228)
15. Good, R. H., Baker, S. K., & Peyton, J. A. (2009). Making sense of nonsense word fluency: Determining adequate progress in early first grade reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 33-56.
16. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
17. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
18. Goodman, K. S. (2006). A critical review of DIBELS. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.), The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does (pp. 1-39). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
20. Gross, A. L. (1982). Relaxing assumptions underlying corrections for range restriction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 795-801.
21. Harcourt Assessment, Inc. (2004). Stanford Achievement Test series-Tenth edition technical data report. San Antonio, TX: Author.
22. Ham, B. A., Stoolmiller, M., & Chard, D. J. (2008). Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: The role of automaticity and unitization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 143-157.
23. Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Coyne, M. D. (2000). Schools as host environments: Toward a school-wide reading improvement model. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 31-52.
24. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
25. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
26. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
27. National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Paris, S. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184-202.
29. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42-71.
32. Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Advancing educational policy by advancing research on instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 206-230.
33. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Stoolmiller, M. (1998). Correcting estimates of shared environmental variance for range restriction in adoption studies using a truncated multivariate normal model. Behavior Genetics, 28, 429-441.
36. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55-64.
37. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
38. Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test- Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.