The prospects for family business in research universities

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-14

  Stewart, Alex ^a   Miner, Anne S ^b  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Disciplines and specialties; Faculty; Family business; Sociology of science; Theory development

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951554821     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Abbott A. The system of professions 1988, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Abbott A. Chaos of disciplines 2001, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Abbott A. Linked ecologies: States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory 2005, 23:245-274.
4. Adams H. The academic tribes 1988, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 2nd ed.
5. Aldrich H.E., Cliff J.E. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18:573-596.
6. Al-Krenawi A., Graham J.R. The story of Bedouin-Arab women in a polygamous marriage. Women's Studies International Forum 1999, 22:497-509.
7. Anderson A.R., Jack S.L., Drakopoulou S. The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review 2005, 18:135-154.
8. Astrachan J.H. Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1:6-14.
9. Astrachan J.H., Jaskiewicz P. Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Business Review 2008, 21:139-149.
10. Astrachan J.H., Klein S.B., Smyrnios K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review 2002, 15:45-58.
11. Axtell J. The pleasures of academe: A celebration and defense of higher education 1998, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
12. Backhouse R.E., Medema S.G. Defining economics: The long road to acceptance of the Robbins definition. Economica 2009, 76:805-820.
13. Banfield E.C. The moral basis of a backward society 1958, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
14. Barnes R.H. Maurice Godelier and the metamorphosis of kinship: A review essay. Comparative Studies in Society and History 2006, 48:326-358.
15. Becher T., Trowler P.R. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines 2001, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK. 2nd ed.
16. Blee K.M. Contending with disciplinarity. Women's studies on its own 2002, 177-182. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. R. Wiegman (Ed.).
17. Bloch M. The moral and tactical meaning of kinship terms. Man (N.S.) 1971, 6:79-87.
18. Bloch M. The long term and the short term: The economic and political significance of the morality of kinship. The character of kinship 1973, 75-87. Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Goody (Ed.).
19. Bloch M., Sperber D. Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions: The mother's brother controversy reconsidered. Current Anthropology 2002, 43:723-748.
20. Boxer M.J. Women's studies as women's history. Women's Studies Quarterly 2002, 30(3/4):42-51.
21. Boyer P. Science, erudition, and relevant connections. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2003, 3:344-358.
22. Boyer E.L. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate 1990, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
23. de Lima A.P. Is blood thicker than economic interest in familial enterprises?. Dividends of kinship: Meanings and uses of social relatedness 2000, 151-176. Routledge, London. P.P. Schweitzer (Ed.).
24. Campbell D.T Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences 1969, 328-348. Aldine, Chicago. M. Sherif, C.W. Sherif (Eds.).
25. Castrogiovanni G.J., Vozikis G.S., Mescon T. Endowed chairs in entrepreneurship: Deans' preferences versus chair holders' experiences. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2007, 3:205-215.
26. Cavalli A. Reflections on political culture and the " Italian national character": The debate over " amoral familism" and its consequences. Daedalus 2001, 130(3):119-137.
27. Chen H. AI and security informatics. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2010, 25(5):82-90.
28. Chrisman J.J., Kellermanns F.W., Chan K.C., Liano K. Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review 2010, 23:9-26.
29. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999, 23(4):19-39.
30. Crane D. Fashion in science: Does it exist?. Social Problems 1969, 16:433-441.
31. Creed G.W. " Family values" and domestic economies. Annual Review of Anthropology 2000, 29:329-355.
32. Danes S.M., Rueter M.A., Kwon H.-K., Doherty W. Family FIRO model: An application to family business. Family Business Review 2002, 15:31-43.
33. Davis J.B. The turn in economics and return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2008, 32:349-366.
34. Dentchev N.A. To what extent is business and society literature idealistic?. Business and Society 2009, 48:10-38.
35. Devons E., Gluckman M. Conclusion: Modes and consequences of delimiting a field of study. Closed systems and open minds: The limits of naïvety in social anthropology 1964, 158-261. Chicago, Aldine. M. Gluckman (Ed.).
36. Dhaliwal S. Silent contributors: Asian female entrepreneurs and women in business. Women's Studies International Forum 1998, 21:463-474.
37. Dogan M. The new social sciences: Cracks in the disciplinary walls. International Social Science Journal 1997, 49:429-443.
38. Dogan M., Pahre R. Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersections of social sciences 1990, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
39. Erickson J.I., Daniels A.A., Smith M.E., Vega-Barachowitz C.D. Recognizing clinical excellence at all levels of practice: A multidisciplinary clinical recognition program. Journal of Nursing Administration 2008, 38(2):68-75.
40. Fagerberg J., Verspagen B. Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy 2009, 38:218-233.
41. Fallone E.A. Cross campus collaboration: A law school perspective. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:315-321.
42. Fogel K. Oligarchic family control, social economic outcomes, and the quality of government. Journal of International Business Studies 2006, 37:603-622.
43. Fortes M Kinship and the social order: The legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan 1969, Chicago, Aldine.
44. Fraley R.C., Brumbaugh C.C., Marks M.J. The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:731-746.
45. Freeman D. Kinship, attachment behaviour and the primary bond. The character of kinship 1973, 109-119. Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Goody (Ed.).
46. Garand J.C. Integration and fragmentation in political science: Exploring patterns of scholarly communication in a divided discipline. Journal of Politics 2005, 67:979-1005.
47. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
48. Graetz M.J., Shapiro I. Death by a thousand cuts: The fight over taxing inherited wealth 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
49. Greenhalgh S. De-orientalizing the Chinese family firm. American Ethnologist 1994, 21:746-775.
50. Gulati R. Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50:775-782.
51. Gumport P.J. Academic pathfinders: Knowledge creation and feminist scholarship 2002, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
52. Hambrick D.C., Chen M.-J. New academic fields as admittance-seeking movements: The case of strategic management. Academy of Management Review 2008, 33:32-54.
53. Hargens L.L. Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review 2000, 65:846-865.
54. Harrell S. Human Families 1997, Boulder, CO, Westview.
55. Heck R.K.Z., Hoy F., Poutziouris P.Z., Steier L.P. Emerging paths of family entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management 2008, 46:317-330.
56. Holy L. Anthropological perspectives on kinship 1996, Pluto, London.
57. Howard J.A. Border crossings between women's studies and sociology. Contemporary Sociology 1999, 28:525-528.
58. Hoy F. Team approaches to entrepreneurship and family business education. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth 2010, 12:349-357.
59. Jones A.M. The elementary structures of the family firm: An anthropological perspective. Human Organization 2005, 64:276-285.
60. Katz J.A. Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management 2008, 46:550-566.
61. Kaufman B.E. Paradigms in industrial relations: Original, modern and versions in-between. British Journal of Industrial Relations 2008, 46:314-339.
62. Keesing R.M. Kinship, bonding, and categorization. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 1990, 1:159-167.
63. Kerr C. The uses of the university 2001, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 5th ed.
64. Khurana R. From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and their unfulfilled promise of management as a profession 2007, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
65. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and integration. Interdisciplinary collaboration 2005, 23-50. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.J. Derry, C.D. Schunn, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
66. Lamme M.O., Russell K.M. Removing the spin: Toward a new theory of public relations history. Journalism and Communication Monographs 2010, 11:281-362.
67. Lansbury R.D. Work and industrial relations: Towards a new agenda. Relations Industrielles 2009, 64:326-339.
68. Larsen P.O., von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publications and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010, 84:575-603.
69. Leahey E. Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. Social Forces 2007, 72:533-561.
70. Leahey E., Reikowsky R.C. Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studies of Science 2008, 38:425-440.
71. Learned, K. E. (1995). The creation of firm resources: A native ethnography. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
72. Liang N., Wang J. Implicit mental models in teaching cases: An empirical study of popular MBA cases in the United States and China. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2004, 3:397-413.
73. Lumpkin G.T., Brigham K.H., Moss T.W. Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 2010, 22:241-264.
74. March J.G. A scholar's quest. Journal of Management Inquiry 2003, 12:205-207.
75. McKelvey B. Organizational systematics: Taxomony, evolution, classification 1982, University of California Press, Berkeley.
76. Melin L., Nordqvist M. The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of family business. Strategic Organization 2007, 5:321-333.
77. Merton R.K. Social conflict over styles of sociological work. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations 1973, 46-69. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. R.K. Merton (Ed.).
78. Meyer A.D. What is strategy's distinctive competence?. Journal of Management 1991, 17:821-833.
79. Miner A.S. The promise of family business as an academic field in major research universities. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:323-336.
80. Mitrani V.B., Weiss-Laxer N.S., Ow C.E., Burns M.J., Ross-Russell S., Feaster D.J. Examining family networks of HIV+ women in drug recovery: Challenges and opportunities. Families, Systems, and Health 2009, 27:267-283.
81. Mittal V., Feick L., Murshed F. Publish and prosper: The financial impact of publishing by marketing faculty. Marketing Science 2008, 27:430-442.
82. Morillo F., Bordons M., Gómez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(13):1237-1249.
83. Murphy D.L. Understanding the complexities of private family firms: An empirical investigation. Family Business Review 2005, 18:123-133.
84. Needham R. Remarks on the analysis of kinship and marriage. Rethinking kinship and marriage 1971, 1-34. Tavistock, London. R. Needham (Ed.).
85. Nicholson N. Evolutionary psychology and family business: A new synthesis for theory, research, and practice. Family Business Review 2008, 21:103-118.
86. Nolin J., Åström F. Turning weakness into strength: Strategies for future LIS. Journal of Documentation 2010, 66:7-27.
87. O'Donnell A.M., Derry S.J. Cognitive processes in interdisciplinary groups: Problems and possibilities. Interdisciplinary collaboration 2005, 51-82. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S.J. Derry, C.D. Schunn, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
88. Peletz M.G. Ambivalence in kinship since the 1940s. Relative values: Refiguring kinship studies 2001, 413-444. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. S. Franklin, S. McKinnon (Eds.).
89. Pine F. Family. Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology 1996, 223-228. Routledge, London. A. Barnard, J. Spencer (Eds.).
90. Porter L.W., McGibbin L.E. Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century? 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York.
91. Porter A.L., Roessner J.D., Heberger A.E. How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?. Research Evaluation 2008, 17:273-282.
92. Poza E.J. Late stage entrepreneurial activity: What students should know about family-owned and family-controlled companies. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth 2010, 12:359-366.
93. Ram M., Holliday R. Relative merits: Family culture and kinship in small firms. Sociology 1993, 27:629-648.
94. Rutherford D. Kinship, capital and the unsettling of assumptions: Contemporary anthropology and the study of family enterprise and entrepreneurship. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:277-283.
95. Sanjek R. Household. Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology 1996, 385-387. Routledge, London. A. Barnard, J. Spencer (Eds.).
96. Scheffler H.W. Kinship and gender. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:285-290.
97. Schneider D.M. Schneider on Schneider: The conversion of the Jews and other anthropological stories by David Schneider as told to Richard Handler 1995, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
98. Schulze W.S., Gedajlovic E.R. Guest editors' introduction: Whither family business?. Journal of Management Studies 2010, 47:191-204.
99. Sharma P. An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review 2004, 17:1-36.
100. Sharma P. Advancing the 3Rs of family business scholarship: Rigor, relevance, reach. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:383-400.
101. Sharma P., Hoy F., Astrachan J.H., Koiranen M. The practice-driven evolution of family business education. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60:1012-1021.
102. Slingerland E. Confucius Analects, with selections from traditional commentaries 2003, Hackett, Indianpolis, IN.
103. Sorenson R.L., Yu A., Brigham K.H. Taking stock of one decade of research: An outcomes-based framework for teaching family business. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:367-375.
104. Steadman L.B., Palmer C.T., Tilley C.F. The universality of ancestor worship. Ethnology 1996, 35:63-76.
105. Steier L. New venture creation and organization: A familial sub-narrative. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60:1099-1107.
106. Stewart A. Journal ranking in Nacirema ritual: The case of I.C. MacMillan's publishing forums. Advances in Strategic Management 1995, 12(A):3-37.
107. Stewart A. The ethnographer's method 1998, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
108. Stewart A. Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27:383-396.
109. Stewart A. Who could best complement a team of family business researchers, scholars down the hall or in another building?. Family Business Review 2008, 21:279-293.
110. Stewart A. Skeptical about family business. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:231-241.
111. Stewart A. Sources of entrepreneurial discretion in kinship systems. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:291-313.
112. Stewart A., Hitt M.A. The yin and yang of kinship and business: Complementary or contradictory forces? (And can we really say?). Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:243-276.
113. Stocking G.W. Delimiting anthropology: Historical reflections on the boundaries of a boundless discipline. Social Research 1995, 62:933-966.
114. Trevinyo-Rodríguez R.N. A family business project? So what! eight strategies for intrapreneurial scholars. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth 2010, 12:377-381.
115. Viazzo P.P., Lynch K.A. Anthropology, family history, and the concept of strategy. International Review of Social History 2002, 47:423-452.
116. Whyte M.K. The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or engine?. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1996, 44:1-30.
117. Winkler B.S. Review of women's studies on the edge and the evolution of American women's studies. Feminist Formations 2010, 22:209-214.
118. Winter M., Fitzgerald M.A., Heck R.K.Z., Hayes G.W., Danes S.M. Revisiting the study of family business: Methodological challenges, dilemmas, and alternative approaches. Family Business Review 1998, 11:239-252.
119. Zald M.N. Spinning disciplines: Critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education. Organization 2002, 9:365-385.