The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 349-366

  Davis, John B ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Core periphery; Heterodoxy; Orthodoxy; Recent economics

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); CORE-PERIPHERY RELATIONS; ECONOMIC THEORY; ECONOMICS; RESEARCH PROGRAM; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 43149126330     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bem048     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
2. Anderson, G., Elkelund, R. and Tollison, R. 1992. Methodenstreit, The economics of competing interests, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 8, no. 3, 401-18
3. Arthur, W. Durlauf. S. and Lane. D. (eds) 1997. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, Reading, Addison-Wesley.
4. Backhouse, R. 2000. Progress in heterodox economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, 149-55
5. Backhouse, R. 2004. A suggestion for clarifying the study of dissent in economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 26, no. 2, 261-71
6. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Homo Academicus, translated by P. Collier, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press
7. Bowker, G. and Starr, S. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
8. Camerer. C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
9. Camerer, C. and Fehr. E. 2004. Measuring Social Norm and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists, pp. 55-95 in Heinrich, J. et al. (eds), Foundations of Human Sociality, Oxford, Oxford University Press
10. Camerer, C. and Loewenstein. G. 2003. Behavioral Economics: Past. Present, Future, in Camerer, C., Loewenstein. G. and Rabin, M. (eds), Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press
11. Camerer, C., T. Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 43, 9-64
12. Clark, A. 1997. Being There, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
13. Coats, A. 1999. The Progress of Heterodox Economics, in Garrouste, P. and Ionnides, S. (eds), Evolution and Path-Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, Aldershot, Elgar
14. Colander, D. (ed.) 1996. Beyond Microfoundations: Post Walrasian Macroeconomics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
15. Colander, D. 2000 The Death of Neoclassical Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, 127-44
16. Colander, D. 2003A. Post Walrasian Macroeconomics and Heterodoxy: Thinking Outside the Heterodox Box, International Journal of Political Economy, vol. 33, no. 2, 17-35.
17. Colander, D. 2003B. Post Walrasian Macro Policy and the Economics of Muddling Through, International Journal of Political Economy, vol. 33, no. 2, 68-81
18. Colander, D., Holt, R. and Rosser, B. 2004. The Changing Face of Economics, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press
19. Collins, R. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Changes, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
20. Cubitt, R., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. 2001. Discovered preferences and the experimental evidence of expected utility theory, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 8, no. 3, 385-414
21. David, P. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, vol. 75, 332-7
22. David, P. 2005. Path dependence in economic processes: Implications for policy analysis in dynamical systems contexts, in Dopfer,K. (ed.), The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
23. Davis, J. 2003. The Theory of the Individual in Economics, London, Routledge
24. Davis, J. 2006. The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralissm?, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, 1-20
25. Davis, J. 2007. Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis, in Garnett, R. and Harvey J. (eds), Future Directions in Heterodox Economics, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press
26. Davis, J. 2008. Competing conceptions of the individual in recent economics, in Kincaid, H. and Ross, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press
27. Davis, J. and Sent E.-M. 2006. 'Heterodoxy's Strategic Pluralism', paper presented at the annual European History of Economics Society meetings, Porto, Portugal
28. DeMartino, G. 2005. A Professional Ethics Code for Economists, Challenge, vol. 48, no. 4, 88-104
29. Dow, S. 2000. Prospects for the Progress of Heterodox Economics, Journal of the history of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, 158-70
30. Frey, B. and Benz, M. 2004. From imperialism to inspiration: A survey of economics and psychology, in Davis, J., Marciano, A. and Runde, J. (eds), The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Cheltenham. Elgar
31. Friedman, D. and Cassar, A. with contributions from Reinhard Selten and others 2004. Economics Lab: An intensive Course in Experimental Economics, London, Routledge
32. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. 1992. Three type of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, pp. 251-74 in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT. Praeger
33. Gieryn, T. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional interest of scientist, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, 781-95
34. Gieryn, T. 1993. Boundaries of Science, pp. 393-443 in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. and Pinch, T. (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
35. Gieryn, T. 1999. Cultural Boudaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
36. Gintis, H. 2007. A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30, 1-61
37. Guala, F. 2001. Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 32, no. 453-77
38. Hargreaves Heap, S. and Varoufakis, Y. 2004. Game Theory: A Critical Text, 2nd edn, London, Routledge
39. Hausman, D. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
40. Henrich, J. Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. (eds) 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality, Oxford, Oxford University Press
41. Holland, J. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
42. Holt, R. and Pressman, S. (eds) 1998. Economics and its Discontents: Twentieth Century Dissenting Economists, Cheltenham, Elgar
43. Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 5, 1449-75
44. Kirman, A. 2001. Market Organization and Individual Behavior: Evidence from Fish Markets, pp. 155-95 in Rauch, J. and Casella, A. (eds), Networks and Markets, New York, Russell Sage
45. Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 28, 167-95
46. Lawlor, M. 2007. The Economic of Keynes in Historical Context: An Intellectual History of the General Theory, London, Palgrave
47. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and Reality, London Routledge
48. Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, 483-505
49. Lee, F. 2006. 'Heterodox Economics', University of Missouri-Kansas City, September 12. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, 309-325.
50. Lee, F. (forthcoming). The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities, Cambridge Journal of Economics.
51. Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature;s Economics, New York, Cambridge University Press
52. Mirowski. P. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science New York, Cambridge University Press
53. Morgan, M. and Rutherford, M. (eds) 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Durham, Duke University Press
54. Nik-Khan, E, 2006. What the FCC auctions can tell us about the Performativity thesis, Economic Sociology, vol. 7, no. 2, 15-21
55. North, D. 2004. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
56. Peart, S. and Levy, D. 2005. The 'Vanity of the Philosopher': From Equality to Hierarchy in Post-classical Economics, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press
57. Plott, C. 1996. Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: The discovered preference hypothesis, pp. 225-50 in Arrow, K., Columbatto, E., Perlman, M. and Schmidt, C. (eds), The Rational Foundations Economic Behavior, Basingstoke, Macmillan
58. Ravetz, J. 1986. Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: Incomplete science with policy implications, pp. 415-32 in Clark, W. and Munn, R. (eds), Sustainable Development in the Biosphere, New York, Cambridge University Press
59. Reay, M.. 2006. 'The Uses of Economics', paper presented at the annual History of Economics Society meeting, Grinnell, Iowa, USA. 33rd annual meeting of the History of Economics Society, June 23-26, 2006.
60. Rizvi, S. 1994. Game Theory to the Rescue? Contributions to Political Economy, vol. 13, 1-28
61. Samuelson, L. 2002. Evolution and Game Theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, 47-66
62. Samuelson, L. 2005. Economic Theory and Experimental Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 43, 65-107
63. Sent, E.-M. 2004. Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back Into Economics, History of Political Economy, vol. 36, 737-62
64. Smith, V. 1989. Theory, Experiment and Economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 1, 151-69
65. Smith, V. 1994. Economics in the Laboratorv, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, 113-31
66. Smith, V. 2003. Experimental Methods, pp. 1070-79 in Economics, in Nadel, L. (Ed.), Cognitive Science Encyclopedia, London, Nature Publishing
67. Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 38, 332-82
68. Sunstein, C. and Thaler, R. 2003. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron, University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 70, no. 4, 1159-202
69. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. 1985. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, in Worchel, S. and Austin, W. (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago, Nelson-Hall
70. Tesfatsion, L. 2001. Structure, Behavior, and Market Power in an Evolutionary Labor Market with Adaptive Search, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 25, 419-57
71. Testfatsion, L. 2005. 'Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory', Iowa State University working paper, 31 March
72. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1944. The Theory of Games and Economics Behavior, Princeton, Princeton University Press
73. Young, W. 1987. Interpreting Mr. Keynes, Boulder, CO, Westview