Integration and fragmentation in political science: Exploring patterns of scholarly communication in a divided discipline

Journal of Politics

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 979-1005

  Garand, James C ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745295627     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00347.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Almond, Gabriel. 1988. "Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science." PS 21 (Autumn): 828-42.
2. Bennett, Stephen Earle. 2002. "'Perestroika' Lost: Why the Latest 'Reform' Movement in Political Science Should Fail." PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (June): 177-79.
3. Crewe, Ivor, and Pippa Norris. 1991. "British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence." PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (September): 524-30.
4. Dahl, Robert. 1961. "The Behavioral Movement in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest." American Political Science Review 55 (December): 763-72.
5. Easton, David. 1967. "The Current Meaning of Behavioralism." In Contemporary Political Analysis, ed. James Charlesworth. New York: Free Press, pp. 11-31.
6. Easton, David. 1969. "The New Revolution in Political Science." American Political Science Review 63 (December): 1051-61.
7. Finifter, Ada. 2000. "Editor's Notes." American Political Science Review 94 (December): viii-xi.
8. Freeman, Donald. 1991. "The Making of a Discipline." In The Theory and Practice of Political Science, Volume One of Political Science: Looking into the Future, ed. William Crotty. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 15-44.
9. Fukuyama, Francis. 2005. "How Academia Failed the Nation: The Decline of Regional Studies." http://www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/ publications/saisphere/winter04/Fukuyama.html.
10. Garand, James C. 1990. "An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations." PS: Political Science and Politics 23 (September): 448-51.
11. Garand, James, and Micheal Giles. 2003. "Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists." PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (April): 293-308.
12. Goodson, Larry, Bradford Dillman, and Anil Hira. 1999. "Ranking the Presses: Political Scientists Evaluations of Publisher Quality." PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (June): 257-62.
13. Grant, J. Tobin. 2005. "What Divides Us? The Image and Organization of Political Science." PS: Political Science and Politics 38(3): 379-86.
14. Jervis, Robert. 2002. "Politics, Political Science, and Specialization." PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (June): 187-89.
15. Kasza, Gregory. 2001. "Perestroika: For an Ecumenical Science of Politics." PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (September): 597-99.
16. Landman, Todd. 2002. "Rebutting 'Perestroika': Method and Substance in Political Science." Unpublished manuscript. University of Essex.
17. Parenti, Michael. 1983. "The State of the Discipline: One Interpretation of Everyone's Favorite Controversy." PS: Political Science and Politics 16 (Spring): 189-96.
18. Ricci, David. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19. Seidelman, Raymond. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20. Shepsle, Kenneth. 1990. "Untitled Commentary." In "The Nature of Contemporary Political Science: A Roundtable Discussion," ed. Monroe, Kristen et al. PS: Political Science and Politics 23 (March): 40-12.
21. Smith, Rogers. 2002. "Should We Make Political Science More of a Science or More About Politics?" PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (June): 199-201.