Predicting Reasoning From Memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 76-101

  Heit, Evan ^a   Hayes, Brett K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Inductive reasoning; Mathematical modeling; Recognition memory; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COGNITION; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 79951544367     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021488     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. AKC recognized breeds 2006, American Kennel Club, Retrieved from http://www.akc.org/breeds/breeds_a.cfm.
2. Borowiak D.S. Model discrimination for nonlinear regression models 1989, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
3. Bott L., Murphy G.L. Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:432-443.
4. Brainerd C.J., Kingma J. On the independence of short-term memory and working memory in cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology 1985, 17:210-247. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90008-8.
5. Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F. Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review 1993, 100:42-67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.42.
6. Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F. Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. Developmental Review 2004, 24:396-439. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005.
7. Cary M., Reder L.M. A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:231-248. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00061-5.
8. Clark S.E., Gronlund S.D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:37-60.
9. Criss A.H. The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:297-319. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.07.003.
10. Criss A.H., McClelland J.L. Differentiating the differentiation models: A comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM). Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:447-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.003.
11. Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2009). The inverse list length effect: Implications for separate storage models of recognition memory. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2385-2390.
12. Dennis S., Humphreys M.S. A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review 2001, 108:452-478. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.452.
13. Dennis S., Lee M.D., Kinnell A. Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list length effect. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:361-376. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.007.
14. Diana R.A., Reder L.M., Arndt J., Park H. Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1-21.
15. Estes W.K. Classification and cognition 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195073355.001.0001.
16. Evans J.St.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:255-278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
17. Feeney A. How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:884-889.
18. Fisher R. The design of experiments 1951, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
19. Flexser A.J., Bower G.H. How frequency affects recency judgments: A model for recency discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 103:706-716. doi: 10.1037/h0037194.
20. Gentner D., Rattermann M., Forbus K.D. The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology 1993, 25:524-575. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1013.
21. Glanzer M., Kim K., Hilford A., Adams J.K. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:500-513. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.500.
22. Goldstone R.L. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition 1994, 52:125-157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5.
23. Hastie R., Park B. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review 1986, 93:258-268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258.
24. Hayes B.K., Foster K., Gadd N. Prior knowledge and subtyping effects in children's category learning. Cognition 2003, 88:171-199. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00021-0.
25. Hayes B.K., Heit E. Why learning and development can lead to poorer recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:337-339. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.001.
26. Hayes B.K., Heit E., Swendsen H. Inductive reasoning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2010, 1:278-292.
27. Hayes B.K., McKinnon R., Sweller N. The development of category-based induction: Reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition paradigm. Developmental Psychology 2008, 44:1430-1441. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.5.1430.
28. Heit E. Categorization using chains of examples. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:341-380. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90011-P.
29. Heit E. Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1264-1282. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1264.
30. Heit E. A Bayesian analysis of some forms of inductive reasoning. Rational Models of Cognition 1998, 248-274. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. M. Oaksford, N. Chater (Eds.).
31. Heit E. Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:712-731. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.712.
32. Heit E. Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:569-592.
33. Heit E. Putting together prior knowledge, verbal arguments, and observations in category learning. Memory & Cognition 2001, 29:828-837.
34. Heit E. What is induction and why study it?. Inductive reasoning 2007, 1-24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. A. Feeney, E. Heit (Eds.).
35. Heit E., Brockdorff N., Lamberts K. Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:718-723.
36. Heit E., Hayes B.K. Relations between categorization, induction, recognition and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:596-605. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.596.
37. Heit E., Hayes B.K. Predicting reasoning from visual memory. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2008, 1831-1836. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
38. Heit E., Rotello C.M. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:805-812. doi: 10.1037/a0018784.
39. Heit E., Rubinstein J. Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:411-422. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.2.411.
40. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1988, 95:528-551. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528.
41. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recency: How they relate to reports of subjective awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1347-1358. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1347.
42. Holyoak K.J., Koh K. Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition 1987, 15:332-340.
43. Jones C.M., Heit E. An evaluation of the total similarity principle: Effects of similarity on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:799-812. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.799.
44. Kemp C., Tenenbaum J.B. Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning. Psychological Review 2009, 116:20-58. doi: 10.1037/a0014282.
45. Lamberts K. Flexible tuning of similarity in exemplar-based categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1003-1021. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1003.
46. Lamberts K. Feature sampling in categorization and recognition of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. Human Experimental Psychology 2002, 55:141-154. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000208.
47. Lee H.S., Holyoak K.J. Causal models in analogical inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/a0012581.
48. Lichtenstein S., Slovic P., Fischoff B., Layman M., Combs B. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1978, 4:551-578. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551.
49. Macmillan N.A., Kaplan H.L. Detection theory analysis of group data: Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false alarm rates. Psychological Bulletin 1985, 98:185-199. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.185.
50. Medin D.L., Coley J.D., Storms G., Hayes B.K. A relevance theory of induction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:517-532.
51. Metcalfe J., Fisher R.M. The relation between recognition memory and classification learning. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:164-173.
52. Murdock B.B., Kahana M.J. Analysis of the list-strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:689-697. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.689.
53. Murphy G.L., Medin D.L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 1985, 92:289-316. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289.
54. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:39-57. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39.
55. Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:700-708. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.700.
56. Nosofsky R.M. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:54-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.54.
57. Nosofsky R.M. Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:3-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3.
58. Nosofsky R.M., Zaki S.R. Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation. Psychological Science 1998, 9:247-255. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00051.
59. Osherson D.N., Smith E.E., Wilkie O., Lopez A., Shafir E. Category-based induction. Psychological Review 1990, 97:185-200. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.185.
60. Ratcliff R. Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review 1990, 97:285-308. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.285.
61. Ratcliff R., Clark S.E., Shiffrin R.M. The list-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:163-178. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.163.
62. Rehder B., Burnett R. Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 50:264-314. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.002.
63. Ross B.H. This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987, 13:629-639. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.629.
64. Ross B.H., Murphy G.L. Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 38:495-553. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0712.
65. Rotello C.M., Heit E. Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for Recall-to-reject?. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:432-453. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2623.
66. Rotello C.M., Heit E. Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:907-922.
67. Rotello C.M., Heit E. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1317-1330. doi: 10.1037/a0016648.
68. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., Reeder J.A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model. Psychological Review 2004, 111:588-616. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.588.
69. Shafto P., Coley J.D. Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: Novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:641-649. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.641.
70. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 1987, 237:1317-1323. doi: 10.1126/science.3629243.
71. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM: Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:145-166.
72. Shin H.J., Nosofsky R.M. Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:278-304. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.278.
73. Sloman S.A. Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology 1993, 25:231-280. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1006.
74. Sloman S.A., Lagnado D.A. The problem of induction. The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning 2005, 95-116. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison (Eds.).
75. Sloutsky V.M., Fisher A.V. Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity-based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:166-188. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.166.
76. Tenenbaum J.B., Griffiths T.L. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:629-640. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000061.
77. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 1977, 84:327-352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327.
78. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5:207-232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
79. Underwood B.J. Recognition memory as a function of the length of study list. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1978, 12:89-91.
80. Wilburn C., Feeney A. Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children. Cognition 2008, 106:1451-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.018.
81. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152.
82. Xu F., Tenenbaum J.B. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 2007, 114:245-272. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245.
83. Yamauchi T., Markman A.B. Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 39:124-148. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2566.
84. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.