Relations Between Inductive Reasoning and Deductive Reasoning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 805-812

  Heit, Evan ^a   Rotello, Caren M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

mathematical modeling; reasoning; similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; ROC CURVE;

EID: 77953153836     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018784     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Calvillo D.P., and Revlin R. The role of similarity in deductive categorical inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 938-944
2. Cohen J., Cohen P., Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Applied multiple regression-Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (2002), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
3. Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2009). Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: It's a response bias effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Evans J.St.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (2008) 255-278
5. Evans J.St.B.T., and Curtis-Holmes J. Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 11 (2005) 382-389
6. Harman G. Reasoning, meaning, and mind (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
7. Hayes, B. K., Heit, E., & Swendsen, H. (in press). Inductive reasoning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
8. Heit E. A Bayesian analysis of some forms of inductive reasoning. In: Oaksford M., and Chater N. (Eds). Rational models of cognition (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 248-274
9. Heit E. What is induction and why study it?. In: Feeney A., and Heit E. (Eds). Inductive reasoning (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 1-24
10. Heit E., and Feeney A. Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 340-344
11. Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2005). Are there two kinds of reasoning? In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 923-928). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Modeling two kinds of reasoning. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1831-1836). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
13. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models and probabilistic thinking. Cognition 50 (1994) 189-209
14. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide. 2nd ed. (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
15. Metz C.E. ROCKIT (1998), Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/roc_soft6.htm Retrieved from http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/roc_soft6.htm, Computer software
16. Oaksford M., and Chater N. Common sense reasoning, logic, and human rationality. In: Elio R. (Ed). Common sense reasoning and rationality (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 174-214
17. Oaksford M., and Hahn U. Induction, deduction, and argument strength in human reasoning and argumentation. In: Feeney A., and Heit E. (Eds). Inductive reasoning (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 269-301
18. Osherson D.N., Smith E.E., Wilkie O., Lopez A., and Shafir E. Category-based induction. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 185-200
19. Rips L.J. Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14 (1975) 665-681
20. Rips L.J. Two kinds of reasoning. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 129-134
21. Rotello C.M., and Heit E. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (2009) 1317-1330
22. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., and Reeder J.A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two dimensional signal detection model. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 588-616
23. Rotello C.M., Masson M.E.J., and Verde M.F. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics 70 (2008) 389-401
24. Shafto P., Coley J.D., and Baldwin D. Effects of time pressure on context sensitive property induction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2007) 890-894
25. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237 (1987, September 11) 1317-1323
26. Skyrms B. Choice and chance: An introduction to inductive logic. 4th ed. (2000), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
27. Sloman S.A. Feature-based induction. Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 231-280
28. Sloman S.A. Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology 35 (1998) 1-33
29. Stanovich K.E. What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought (2009), Yale, New Haven, CT
30. Tenenbaum J.B., and Griffiths T.L. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 629-641
31. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology 26 (1985) 1-12
32. Wixted J.T., and Stretch V. In defense of the signal-detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 616-641