Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 718-723

  Heit, Evan ^a   Brockdorff, Noellie ^a   Lamberts, Koen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346271901     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196537     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BROCKDORFF, N., & LAMBERTS, K. (2000). A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 77-102.
2. CURRAN, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938.
3. DOSHER, B. A., & ROSEDALE, G. (1991). Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 125-160.
4. ESTES, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. ESTES, W. K., & MADDOX, W. T. (1995). Interactions of stimulus attributes, base rates, and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1075-1095.
6. GALLO, D. A., ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & McDERMOTT, K. B. (2001). Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 579-586.
7. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
8. GRONLUND, S. D., & RATCLIFF, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 846-858.
9. HINTZMAN, D. L., & CAULTON, D. A. (1997). Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 1-23.
10. HINTZMAN, D. L., CAULTON, D. A., & CURRAN, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 275-289.
11. HINTZMAN, D. L., CAULTON, D. A., & LEVITIN, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory & Cognition, 26, 449-462.
12. HINTZMAN, D. L., & CURRAN, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 1-18.
13. HINTZMAN, D. L., & CURRAN, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228-247.
14. HIRSHMAN, E., & HENZLER, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection. Psychological Science, 8, 61-65.
15. LAMBERTS, K., BROCKDORFF, N., & HEIT, E. (2002). Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1176-1191.
16. LOVE, B. C. (2002). Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 829-835.
17. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. McELREE, B., DOLAN, P. O., & JACOBY, L. L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 563-582.
19. MILLER, M. B., & WOLFORD, G. L. (1999). The role of criterion shift in false memory. Psychological Review, 106, 398-405.
20. PALMERI, T. J., & FLANERY, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526-530.
21. RATCLIFF, R., & McKOON, G. (1989). Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 139-155.
22. RATCLIFF, R., SHEU, C.-F., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
23. REED, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574-576.
24. ROTELLO, C. M., & HEIT, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 432-453.
25. ROTELLO, C. M., & HEIT, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
26. SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
27. STRETCH, V., & WIXTED, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 137-196.
28. WICKENS, T. D., & HIRSHMAN, E. (2000). False memories and signal detection theory: Comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999). Psychological Review, 107, 377-383.
29. WIXTED, J. T., & STRETCH, V. (2000). The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory. Psychological Review, 107, 368-376.