Why learning and development can lead to poorer recognition memory

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 337-339

  Hayes, Brett K ^a   Heit, Evan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY;

CONSTRAIN MODELS; INDUCTIVE REASONING; RECOGNITION MEMORY;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

COGNITION; DEVELOPMENT; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 4143121257     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Gelman S. The Essential Child. 2003;Oxford University Press
2. Osherson D.N., et al. Category-based induction. Psychol. Rev. 97:1990;185-200
3. Sloutsky, V.M. and Fisher, A.V. (2004) When learning and development decrease memory: evidence against category-based induction. Psychol. Sci. 15, 553-558.
4. Sloutsky V.M., Fisher A.V. Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133:2004;166-188
5. Sloman S.A. Feature-based induction. Cogn. Psychol. 25:1993;231-280
6. Gelman S.A., Coley J.D. The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Dev. Psychol. 26:1990;796-804
7. Heit E., Hahn U. Diversity-based reasoning in children. Cogn. Psychol. 43:2001;243-273
8. Loose, J. and Mareschal, D. (1999) Inductive reasoning revisited: children's reliance on category labels and appearance. In Proc. 21st Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc., pp. 320-325, Erlbaum.
9. Sloutsky V.M., Napolitano A.C. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Preference for auditory modality in young children. Child Dev. 74:2003;822-833
10. Rakison D.H. Parts, motion, and the development of the animate-inanimate distinction in infancy. Rakison D.H., Oakes L.M. Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion. 2003;159-192 Oxford University Press
11. Yoshida H., Smith L.B. Shifting ontological boundaries: how Japanese- and English-speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts. Dev. Sci. 6:2003;1-17
12. Gelman S.A., et al. Beyond labelling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 63:1998;148
13. Heit E. Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7:2000;569-592
14. Lopez A., et al. The development of category-based induction. Child Dev. 63:1992;1070-1090
15. Estes W.K. Classification and Cognition. 1994;Oxford University Press
16. Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cog. 14:1988;700-708
17. Nosofsky R.M., Zaki S.R. Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesics and normal individuals: an exemplar-based interpretation. Psychol. Sci. 9:1998;247-255