Sidestepping our "scare words": Genre as a possible bridge between L1 and L2 compositionists

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 24-44

  Costino, Kimberly A ^a   Hyon, Sunny ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genre; L1 composition; L2 composition; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951516555     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Atkinson D., Ramanathan V. Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs. TESOL Quarterly 1995, 29:539-568.
2. Bartholomae D. Inventing the university. When a writer can't write: Studies on writer's block and other composing process problems 1985, 273-285. Guilford, New York. M. Rose (Ed.).
3. Benesch S. Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice 2001, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
4. Berlin J. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English 1988, 50:477-494.
5. Berlin J. Poststructuralism, cultural studies, and the composition classroom: Postmodern theory in practice. Rhetoric Review 1994, 11:16-33.
6. Bhatia V.K. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings 1993, Longman, London.
7. Bizzell P. Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text 1982, 3:213-243.
8. Boland M.R. The stakes of not staking our claim: Academic freedom and the subject of composition. College English 2007, 70:32-51.
9. Brodkey L. Writing permitted in designated areas only 1996, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
10. Canagarah S. Multilingual writers and the academic community: Towards a critical relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2002, 1:29-44.
11. Casanave C.P. Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship: (But should it be called " post-process"?). Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:85-102.
12. Celce-Murcia M., Hilles S. Techniques and resources in teaching grammar 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. DeKeyser R. Skill acquisition theory. Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction 2007, 97-113. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ. B. VanPatten, J. Williams (Eds.).
14. Devitt A.J., Reiff M.J., Bawarshi A.S. Scenes of writing: Strategies for composing with genres 2004, Longman, New York.
15. Elbow P. Being a writer vs. being an academic: A conflict in goals. CCC 1995, 46:72-83.
16. Ellis N.C. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2002, 24:143-188.
17. Ellis R. Task-based language learning and teaching 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Feak C.B., Reinhart S.M., Sinsheimer A. A preliminary analysis of law review notes. English for Specific Purposes 2000, 19:197-220.
19. Ferris D.R. Teaching college writing to diverse student populations 2009, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
20. Ferris D.R., Hedgcock J.S. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd. ed.
21. Flowerdew J. Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives 2002, 91-102. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A.M. Johns (Ed.).
22. Fox T. Defending access: A critique of standards in higher education 1999, Boyton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
23. Freedman A., Medway P. Introduction: New views of genre and their implications for education. Learning and teaching genre 1994, 1-22. Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH. A. Freedman, P. Medway (Eds.).
24. Fulkerson R. Composition at the turn of the twenty-first century. CCC 2005, 56:654-687.
25. Hairston M. The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. CCC 1982, 33:76-88.
26. Horner B., Lu M. Representing the " Other": Basic writing and the teaching of basic writing 1998, NCTE, Urbana.
27. Horowitz D.M. What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 1986, 20:445-462.
28. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing 2000, Longman, Harlow, England.
29. Hyland K. Genre and second language writing 2004, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
30. Hyon S. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 1996, 30:693-722.
31. Johns A.M. Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching 2008, 41:237-252.
32. Johns A.M., et al. Crossing the boundaries of genre studies: Commentaries by experts. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006, 15:234-249.
33. Kubota R., Lehner A. Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing 2004, 13:7-27.
34. Matsuda P.K. Composition studies and ESL writing: A disciplinary division of labor. CCC 1999, 50:699-721.
35. Matsuda P.K. Basic writers and second language writers: Toward an inclusive definition. Journal of Basic Writing 2003, 22:67-89.
36. Matsuda P.K. The myth of linguistic homogeneity in U.S. college composition. College English 2006, 68:637-651.
37. Matsuda P.K., et al. Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:151-179.
38. Miller C.R. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 1984, 70:151-167.
39. Pennycook A. Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16:253-269.
40. Ramanathan V., Atkinson D. Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8:45-75.
41. Russell D.R., Fisher D. Online, multimedia case studies for professional education: Revisioning concepts of genre recognition. Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre 2009, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. J. Giltrow, D. Stein (Eds.).
42. Samraj B., Monk L. The statement of purpose in graduate program applications: Genre structure and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 2008, 27:193-211.
43. Santos T. Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing 1992, 1:1-15.
44. Silva T., Leki I. Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing-Past, present, and future. The Modern Language Journal 2004, 88:1-13.
45. Street B.V. Literacy in theory and in practice 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Street, B. V. (2006). Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: Approaches from New Literacy Studies. Paper presented at E-Seminar, European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA), Media Anthropology Network (January, 2006). http://www.media-anthropology.net/.
47. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Swales J.M. Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
49. Swales J.M. Research genres: Explorations and applications 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
51. Tardy C.M. Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006, 15:79-101.
52. Therborn G. The ideology of power and the power of ideology 1980, Verso, London.
53. Toledo P.F. Genre analysis and reading of English as a foreign language: Genre schemata beyond text typologies. Journal of Pragmatics 2005, 37:1059-1079.
54. Zorn J. Interchanges: Responses to Richard Fulkerson's " Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century" CCC 2006, 57:730-738.