Techniques of intraocular pressure measurement;Messverfahren der tonometrie

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 228, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 118-124

  Neuburger, M ^a   Rosentreter, A ^b   Dietlein, T S ^b   Jordan, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

dynamic contour tonometry; glaucoma; Goldmann applanation tonometry; intraocular pressure; Ocular Reponse Analyzer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CALCULATION; CORNEA THICKNESS; DEVICE; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; REVIEW; TECHNIQUE; TONOMETRY;

ARTIFACTS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79851509449     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246053     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957; 134 (4): 221-242
2. Copt RP, Thomas R, Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117 (1): 14-16 (Pubitemid 29056714)
3. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T et al. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115 (9): 1137-1141 (Pubitemid 27387949)
4. Morad Y, Sharon E, Hefetz L et al. Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125 (2): 164-168 (Pubitemid 28081293)
5. Ventura AC, Böhnke M, Mojon DS. Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85 (7): 792-795 (Pubitemid 32662077)
6. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123 (6): 767-772 (Pubitemid 27250923)
7. Shah S. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement-the myth of modern ophthalmology? Ophthalmology 2000; 107 (10): 1805-1807
8. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E et al. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124 (4): 471-476
9. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM et al. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136 (5): 805-813 (Pubitemid 37330022)
10. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnett SS. Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122 (1): 17-21 (Pubitemid 38063599)
11. Frenkel RE, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106 (6): 750-753
12. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q et al. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refractive & Corneal Surgery 1993; 9 (2): 110-117 (Pubitemid 23115902)
13. Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140 (2): 318-320 (Pubitemid 41125819)
14. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45 (9): 3118-3121 (Pubitemid 39121844)
15. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89 (12): 1572-1575 (Pubitemid 41729900)
16. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006; 15 (1): 2-6 (Pubitemid 43068411)
17. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30 (4): 746-751 (Pubitemid 38501466)
18. Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142 (4): 583-590 (Pubitemid 44442067)
19. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006; 113 (12): 2156-2162 (Pubitemid 44838915)
20. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90 (7): 833-835 (Pubitemid 43973990)
21. Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EAH et al. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84 (2): 206-209
22. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46 (12): 4578-4580 (Pubitemid 44264556)
23. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242 (1): 3-7 (Pubitemid 38208277)
24. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M et al. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2006; 15 (3): 213-217
25. Jordan JF, Dietlein TS, Dinslage S et al. New aspects of corneal pachymetry in congenital glaucoma and pediatric aphakic glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222 (11): 883-887 (Pubitemid 41806690)
26. Henriques MJ, Vessani RM, Reis FAC et al. Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2004; 13 (3): 185-188 (Pubitemid 38669067)
27. Amino K, Miyahara S, Tanihara H. Corneal thickness in eyes following pars plana lensectomy for congenital cataracts. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004; 48 (2): 169-171 (Pubitemid 38453793)
28. Brandt JD, Casuso LA, Budenz DL. Markedly increased central corneal thickness: an unrecognized finding in congenital aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137 (2): 348-350 (Pubitemid 38221012)
29. Yücel AA, Stürmer J, Gloor B. Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1990; 197 (4): 329-334 (Pubitemid 20362891)
30. Domke N, Hager A, Wiegand W. Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologe 2006; 103 (7): 583-587
31. Tonnu P, Ho T, Newson T et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, noncontact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89 (7): 851-854 (Pubitemid 40904808)
32. Armstrong TA. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109 (6): 716-720 (Pubitemid 20183435)
33. Lawson-Kopp W, DeJong A, Yudcovitch L et al. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer. Optometry 2002; 73 (2): 81-90
34. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31 (1): 156-162 (Pubitemid 40260703)
35. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K et al. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007; 16 (7): 581-588 (Pubitemid 350307608)
36. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A et al. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47 (10): 4410-4414 (Pubitemid 46579366)
37. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M et al. The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Der Ophthalmologe 2007; 104 (6): 484-489
38. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47 (12): 5337-5347 (Pubitemid 46729154)
39. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141 (5): 868-875
40. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147 (6): 1061-1066, 1066.e1-1066.2
41. Shimmyo M. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148 (4): 623
42. Neuburger M, Böhringer D, Reinhard T et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angleclosure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149 (4): 687-688
43. Rai S, Moster MR, Kesen M et al. Level of disagreement between Proview phosphene tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure readings. J Glaucoma 2005; 14 (2): 120-123 (Pubitemid 40389179)
44. Alvarez TL, Gollance SA, Thomas GA et al. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Ophthalmology 2004; 111 (6): 1077-1085 (Pubitemid 38736985)
45. Li J, Herndon LW, Asrani SG et al. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen. Archives of Ophthalmology 2004; 122 (8): 1117-1121 (Pubitemid 39031125)
46. Rombold F, Thiel MJ, Neubauer AS et al. [Evaluation of portable TGDc-01 tonometers and comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer]. Der Ophthalmologe 2005; 102 (2): 158-162
47. Schlote T, Landenberger H. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc- 01"PRA" in glaucoma patients. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222 (2): 123-131
48. Troost A, Specht K, Krummenauer F et al. Deviations between transpalpebral tonometry using TGDc-01 and Goldmann applanation tonometry depending on the IOP level. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 243 (9): 853-858 (Pubitemid 41386707)
49. Meyer MW, Gockeln R, Hoy L et al. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the digital tonometer TGDc-01 'PRA' and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmic Research 2004; 36 (5): 250-254 (Pubitemid 39664118)
50. Hallberg P, Lindén C, Lindahl OA et al. Applanation resonance tonometry for intraocular pressure in humans. Physiological Measurement 2004; 25 (4): 1053-1065 (Pubitemid 39121184)
51. Hallberg P, Eklund A, Bäcklund T et al. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Journal of Glaucoma 2007; 16 (1): 88-93 (Pubitemid 46114780)
52. Eklund A, Hallberg P, Lindén C et al. An applanation resonator sensor for measuring intraocular pressure using combined continuous force and area measurement. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2003; 44 (7): 3017-3024 (Pubitemid 36759768)
53. Leonardi M, Leuenberger P, Bertrand D et al. First steps toward noninvasive intraocular pressure monitoring with a sensing contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45 (9): 3113-3117 (Pubitemid 39121843)
54. Hediger A, Kniestedt C, Zweifel S et al. Continuous intraocular pressure measurement: First results with a pressure-sensitive contact lens. Der Ophthalmologe 2009; 106 (12): 1111-1115