Family-based genetic association tests

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Martin, Eden R ^a   Rampersaud, Evadnie ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HAPLOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HUMAN; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NUCLEAR FAMILY; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; X CHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE;

EID: 79751509210     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top96     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Cookson WO. 2000a. A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 66: 279-292. [Medline]
2. Abecasis GR, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. 2000b. Pedigree tests of transmission disequilibrium. Eur J Hum Genet 8: 545-551. [Medline]
3. Allison DB. 1997. Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 60: 676-690. [Medline]
4. Allison DB, Heo M, Kaplan N, Martin ER. 1999. Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative trials. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1754-1764. [Medline]
5. Almasy L, Blangero J. 1998. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 62: 1198-1211. [Medline]
6. Arima T, Drewell RA, Oshimura M, Wake N, Surani MA. 2000. A novel imprinted gene, HYMAI, is located within an imprinted domain on human chromosome 6 containing ZAC. Genomics 67: 248-255. [Medline]
7. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. 2005. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.Bioinformatics 21: 263-265. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Cave H, Polak M, Drunat S, Denamur E, Czernichow P. 2000. Refinement of the 6q chromosomal region implicated in transient neonatal diabetes. Diabetes 49: 108-113. [Abstract]
9. Chung RH, Hauser ER, Martin ER. 2006. The APL test: Extension to general nuclear families and haplotypes and the examination of its robustness. Hum Hered 61: 189-199. [Medline]
10. Chung RH, Morris RW, Zhang L, Li YJ, Martin ER. 2007. X-APL: An improved family-based test of association in the presence of linkage for the X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 80: 59-68. [Medline]
11. Clayton D. 1999. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain-haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet 65: 1170-1177. [Medline]
12. Cordell HJ, Barratt BJ, Clayton DG. 2004. Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic association studies: A unified framework for detection of genotype and haplotype associations, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, and parent-of-origin effects. Genet Epidemiol 26: 167-185. [Medline]
13. Ding J, Lin S, Liu Y. 2006. Monte Carlo pedigree disequilibrium test for markers on the X chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 79: 567-573. [Medline]
14. Dudbridge F. 2003. Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol 25: 115-121. [Medline]
15. Dudbridge F. 2008. Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear families and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data. Hum Hered 66: 87-98. [Medline]
16. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS. 1995. The transmission/disequilibrium test: History, subdivision, and admixture. Am J Hum Genet 57: 455-464. [Medline]
17. Falk CT, Rubinstein P. 1987. Haplotype relative risks: An easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 51: 227-233. [Medline]
18. Gardner RJ, Mackay DJ, Mungall AJ, Polychronakos C, Siebert R, Shield JP, Temple IK, Robinson DO. 2000. An imprinted locus associated with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus. Hum Mol Genet 9: 589-596. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu X, Ott J. 2001. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Am J Hum Genet 69: 371-380. [Medline]
20. Hancock DB, Martin ER, Li YJ, Scott WK. 2007. Methods for interaction analyses using family-based case-control data: Conditional logistic regression versus generalized estimating equations. Genet Epidemiol 31: 883-893. [Medline]
21. Horvath S, Laird NM, Knapp M. 2000. The transmission/disequilibrium test and parental-genotype reconstruction for X-chromosomal markers. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1161-1167. [Medline]
22. Horvath S, Xu X, Lake SL, Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Laird NM. 2004. Tests for associating haplotypes with general phenotype data: Application to asthma genetics. Genet Epidemiol 26: 61-69. [Medline]
23. Hutchison KE, Stallings M, McGeary J, Bryan A. 2004. Population stratification in the candidate gene study: Fatal threat or red herring? Psychol Bull 130: 66-79. [Medline]
24. Kidd KK, Morar B, Castiglione CM, Zhao H, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Bonne-Tamir B, Lu RB, Goldman D, Lee C et al. 1998. A global survey of haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium at the DRD2 locus. Hum Genet 103: 211-227. [Medline]
25. Kistner EO, Weinberg CR. 2004. Method for using complete and incomplete trios to identify genes related to a quantitative trait. Genet Epidemiol 27: 33-42. [Medline]
26. Kistner EO, Infante-Rivard C, Weinberg CR. 2006. A method for using incomplete triads to test maternally mediated genetic effects and parent-of-origin effects in relation to a quantitative trait. Am J Epidemiol 163:255-261. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Knowler WC, William RC, Pettitt DJ, Steinberg A. 1988. GM3;5,13,14 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: An association in American Indians by genetic admixture. Am J Hum Gen 43: 520-526. [Medline]
28. Lange C, Demeo DL, Laird NM. 2002. Power and design considerations for a general class of family-based association tests: Quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 71: 1330-1341. [Medline]
29. Martin ER, Kaplan NL, Weir BS. 1997. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 61:439-448. [Medline]
30. Martin ER, Monks SA, Warren LL, Kaplan NL. 2000. A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: The pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 67: 146-154. [Medline]
31. Martin ER, Bass MP, Kaplan NL. 2001. Correcting for a potential bias in the pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 68: 1065-1067. [Medline]
32. Martin ER, Bass MP, Hauser ER, Kaplan NL. 2003. Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes. Am J Hum Genet 73: 1016-1026. [Medline]
33. Martin ER, Ritchie MD, Hahn L, Kang S, Moore JH. 2006. A novel method to identify gene-gene effects in nuclear families: The MDR-PDT. Genet Epidemiol 30: 111-123. [Medline]
34. Mei H, Ma D, Ashley-Koch A, Martin EE. 2005. Extension of multifactor dimensionality reduction for identifying multilocus effects in the GAW14 simulated data. BMC Genet Suppl 16: S145. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S145. [Medline]
35. Mei H, Cuccaro ML, Martin ER. 2007. Multifactor dimensionality reduction-phenomics: A novel method to capture genetic heterogeneity with use of phenotypic variables. Am J Hum Genet 81: 1251-1261. [Medline]
36. Monks SA, Kaplan NL. 2000. Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus. Am J Hum Genet 66: 576-592. [Medline]
37. Morris RW, Kaplan NL. 2002. On the advantage of haplotype analysis in the presence of multiple disease susceptibility alleles. Genet Epidemiol 23: 221-233. [Medline]
38. Ott J. 1989. Statistical properties of the haplotype relative risk. Genet Epidemiol 6: 127-130. [Medline]
39. Rabinowitz D. 1997. A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci. Hum Hered 47: 342-350. [Medline]
40. Rabinowitz D, Laird N. 2000. A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information. Hum Hered 50: 211-223. [Medline]
41. Rampersaud E, Morris RW, Weinberg CR, Speer MC, Martin ER. 2007. Power calculations for likelihood ratio tests for offspring genotype risks, maternal effects, and parent-of-origin (POO) effects in the presence of missing parental genotypes when unaffected siblings are available. Genet Epidemiol 31: 18-30. [Medline]
42. Risch N, Merikangas K. 1996. The future of genetic studies of complex human disorders. Science 273: 1516-1517. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, Bailey LR, Dupont WD, Parl FF, Moore JH. 2001. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69: 138-147. [Medline]
44. Rubinstein P, Walker M, Carpenter C, Carrier C, Krassner J, Falk C, Ginsberg F. 1981. Genetics of HLA disease associations: The use of the haplotype relative risk (HRR) and the "haplo-delta" (dh) estimates in juvenile diabetes from three radical groups. Hum Immunol 3: 384.
45. Schaid DJ. 1999. Case-parents design for gene-environment interaction. Genet Epidemiol 16: 261-273. [Medline]
46. Schulze TG, McMahon FJ. 2002. Genetic association mapping at the crossroads: Which test and why? Overview and practical guidelines. Am J Med Genet 114: 1-11. [Medline]
47. Siegmund KD, Langholz B, Kraft P, Thomas DC. 2000. Testing linkage disequilibrium in sibships. Am J Hum Genet 67: 244-248. [Medline]
48. Sinsheimer JS, Palmer CG, Woodward JA. 2003. Detecting genotype combinations that increase risk for disease: Maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility test. Genet Epidemiol 24: 1-13. [Medline]
49. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. 1996. The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association. Am J Hum Genet 59: 983-989. [Medline]
50. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. 1998. A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: The sib transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 62: 450-458. [Medline]
51. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: The insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52: 506-516. [Medline]
52. Terwilliger JD, Ott J. 1992. A haplotype-based "haplotype relative risk" approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 42: 337-346. [Medline]
53. Thomson G. 1995. Mapping disease genes: Family-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 57: 487-498. [Medline]
54. Thornton T, McPeek MS. 2007. Case-control association testing with related individuals: A more powerful quasi-likelihood score test. Am J Hum Genet 81: 321-337. [Medline]
55. Umbach DM, Weinberg C. 2000. The use of case-parent triads to study joint effects of genotype and exposure.Am J Hum Genet 66: 251-261. [Medline]
56. Weinberg CR. 1999a. Allowing for missing parents in genetic studies of case-parent triads. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1186-1193. [Medline]
57. Weinberg CR. 1999b. Methods for detection of parent-of-origin effects in genetic studies of case-parents triads. Am J Hum Genet 65: 229-235. [Medline]
58. Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. 1998. A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: Assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. Am J Hum Genet 62: 969-978. [Medline]
59. Wheeler E, Cordell HJ. 2007. Quantitative trait association in parent offspring trios: Extension of case/pseudocontrol method and comparison of prospective and retrospective approaches. Genet Epidemiol 31: 813-833. [Medline]
60. Witte JS, Gauderman WJ, Thomas DC. 1999. Asymptotic bias and efficiency in case-control studies of candidate genes and gene-environment interactions: Basic family designs. Am J Epidemiol 149: 693-705. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Zhang L, Martin ER, Chung RH, Li YJ, Morris RW. 2008. X-LRT: A likelihood approach to estimate genetic risks and test association with X-linked markers using a case-parents design. Genet Epidemiol 32: 370-380. [Medline]
62. Zhang L, Martin ER, Morris RW, Li YJ. 2009. Association test for X-linked QTL in family-based designs. Am J Hum Genet 84: 431-444. [Medline]