Analyzing action for agents with varying cognitive capacities

Social Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 56-73

  Killingsworth, Stephen S ^a   Saylor, Megan M ^a   Levin, Daniel T ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751488112     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.56     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., &Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72(3), 708-717. (Pubitemid 33597398)
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(6), 1173-1182.
3. Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (2005). Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 271-283). New York: Guilford.
4. Bíro, S., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). The role of behavioral cues in understanding goal-directed actions in infants. Progress in Brain Research, 164, 303-322. (Pubitemid 47494701)
5. Bíro, S., & Leslie, A. (2006). Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 10(3), 379-398.
6. Brand, R. J., Baldwin, D. A., Ashburn, L. A. (2002). Evidence for "motionese": Modifications in mothers' infant-directed action. Developmental Science, 5(1), 72-83.
7. Brazeal, C., Berlin, M., Brooks, A., Gray, J., & Thomaz, A. (2006). Using perspective taking to learn from ambiguous demonstrations. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 54, 385-393.
8. Csibra, G., Gergely, G, Bíro, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237-267. (Pubitemid 29462583)
9. Dik, G., & Aarts, H. (2007). Behavioral cues to others' motivation and goal pursuits: The perception of effort facilitates goal inference and contagion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 727-737.
10. Dik, G., & Aarts, H. (2008). I want to know what you want: How effort perception facilitates the motivation to infer another's goal. Social Cognition, 26(6), 737-754.
11. Eddy, T. J., Gallup, G. G., & Povinelli, D. J. (1993). Attribution of cognitive states to animals: anthropomorphism in comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 87-101.
12. Epley, N., Keysar, B, Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339. (Pubitemid 39288926)
13. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
14. Gao, T., Newman, G. E., Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59(2), 154-179.
15. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. RO-MAN 2003, Oct. 31-Nov. 2, Millbrae, CA.
16. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. (Pubitemid 46214700)
17. Guajardo, J. J., & Woodward, A. L. (2004). Is agency skin deep? Surface attributes influence infants' sensitivity to goal-directed action. Infancy, 6, 361-384.
18. Hassin, R., Aarts, H., & Ferguson, M. J. (2005). Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 129-140. (Pubitemid 40256512)
19. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
20. Herberg, J. S., Saylor, M. M., Levin, D. T., Ra-tanaswasd, P., & Wilkes, D. M. (2008). Audience contingent variation in action demonstrations for humans and computers. Cognitive Science, 32(6), 1003-1020.
21. Johnson, S., Slaughter V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1(2), 233-238.
22. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2-24.
23. Levin, D. T., & Beck, M. R. (2004). Thinking about seeing: Spanning the difference between metacognitive failure and success. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 121-143). Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Levin, D. T., Saylor, M. M., Varakin, D. A., Gordon, S. M., Kawamura, K., & Wilkes, D. M. (2006). Thinking about thinking in computers, robots, and people. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Development and Learning, 5(49).
25. Long, D. L., & Golding, J. M. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 55-73.
26. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838-850.
27. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. (Pubitemid 30442265)
28. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 28(1), 28-38.
29. Newtson, D., Enquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(12), 847-862.
30. Poynor, D. V., & Morris, R. K. (2003). Inferred goals in narratives: Evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(1), 3-9. (Pubitemid 37177382)
31. Premack, D. (1990). The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36, 1-16.
32. Rasmussen, J. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Craft, H. D. (1993). Humans' perceptions of animal mentality: Ascriptions of thinking. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107(3), 283-290.
33. Reynolds, J. R., Zacks, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 613-643.
34. Shechtman, N., & Horowitz, L. M. (2003). Media inequality in conversation: How people behave differently when inter-acting with computers and people. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5(1), 281-288.
35. Shimizu, Y. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2004). Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science, 7(4), 425-430. (Pubitemid 39196538)
36. Sitnikova, T., Kuperberg, G., & Holocomb, P. J. (2003). Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: An electrophysi-ological investigation. Psychophysiology, 40, 160-164. (Pubitemid 36168925)
37. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951.
38. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655-684. (Pubitemid 33597392)
39. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128.
40. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34. (Pubitemid 128446652)
41. Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28, 979-1008. (Pubitemid 39620375)
42. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M. et al. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 651-655. (Pubitemid 32507380)
43. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21. (Pubitemid 33612309)
44. Zacks, J. M., Tversky B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1),29-58. (Pubitemid 33597692)