Audience-contingent variation in action demonstrations for humans and computers

Cognitive Science

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1003-1020

  Herberg, Jonathan S ^a   Saylor, Megan M ^a   Ratanaswasd, Palis ^a   Levin, Daniel T ^a   Wilkes, D Mitchell ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action analysis; Human computer interaction; Intentions

Indexed keywords

EID: 49949114194     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03640210802022579     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldwin, D. A. and Baird, J. A. (1999) Action analysis: A gateway to intentional inference. Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life, pp. 215-240. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ
2. Baldwin, D. A. and Baird, J. A. (2001) Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, pp. 171-178.
3. Brand, R. J., Baldwin, D. A. and Ashburn, L. A. (2002) Evidence for "motionese": Modifications in mothers' infant-directed action. Developmental Science, 5, pp. 72-83.
4. Brand, R. J., Shallcross, W. L., Sabatos, M. G. and Massie, K. P. (2007) Fine-grained analysis of motionese: Eye-gaze, object exchanges, and action units in infant-versus adult-directed action. Infancy, 11, pp. 203-214.
5. Fernald, A. (1989) Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: Is the melody the message. Child Development, 60, pp. 1497-1510.
6. Fernald, A. and Simon, T. (1984) Expanded intonation contours in mothers' speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20, pp. 104-113.
7. Gentner, D. and Medina, J. (1998) Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, pp. 263-287.
8. Herberg, J. S., Saylor, M. M., Levin, D. T., Ratanaswasd, P. and Wilkes, D. M. (2006) The perceived intentionality of an audience influences action demonstrations. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Development and Learning, p. 34.
9. Jusczyk, P. (1997) The discovery of spoken language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Jusczyk, P., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D., Kennedy, L., Woodward, A. and Piwoz, J. (1992) Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24, pp. 252-293.
11. Killingsworth, S., Saylor, M. M. and Levin, D. T. (2006) Intentional understanding through a machine's eyes
12. Levin, D. T. and Beck, M. R. (2004) Thinking about seeing: Spanning the difference between metacognitive failure and success. Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children, pp. 121-143. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
13. Levin, D. T., Saylor, M. M., Varakin, D. A., Gordon, S. M., Kawamura, K. and Wilkes, D. M. (2006) Thinking about thinking in computers, robots, and people. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Development and Learning, p. 49.
14. Levin, D. T., Saylor, M. M., Killingsworth, S., Gordon, S. and Kawamura, K. (2008) Predictions about the behavior of computers, robots, and people: Testing the scope of intentional theory of mind in adults
15. Meyer, W. U., Mittag, W. and Engler, U. (1986) Some effects of praise and blame on perceived ability and affect. Social Cognition, 4, pp. 293-308.
16. Mishra, P. (2006) Affective feedback from computers and its effect on perceived ability and affect: A test of the computers as social actor hypothesis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, pp. 107-131.
17. (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
18. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J. and Moon, Y. (1996) Can computers be teammates?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, pp. 669-678.
19. Nass, C., Isbister, K. and Lee, E. J. (2000) Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. Embodied conversational agents, pp. 374-402. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. (2000) Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, pp. 81-103.
21. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B. and Dryer, D. C. (1995) Can computer personalities be human personalities?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, pp. 223-239.
22. Nass, C., Moon, Y. and Green, N. (1997) Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, pp. 864-876.
23. Newtson, D. (1973) Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, pp. 28-38.
24. Newtson, D. and Engquist, G. (1976) The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, pp. 436-450.
25. Pollick, F. E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J. and Cho, S. B. (2002) Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research, 46, pp. 2345-2355.
26. Pollick, F. E. and Paterson, H. M. (2008) Movement style, movement features, and the recognition of affect from human movement. Understanding events: From perception to action, pp. 286-308. Oxford University Press, New York
27. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. I. (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media as real people and places, Cambridge University Press, New York
28. Rohlfing, K. J. and Jungmann, T. (2005) Reference via motion: A motionese study. Poster session presented at the 17th Tagung der Fachgruppe Entwicklungspsychologie [Meeting of the Developmental Psychology Division of the German Psychological Society] Bochum, Germany
29. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E. and Cohen, J. D. (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 13, pp. 1755-1758.
30. Saylor, M. M. and Baldwin, D. A. (2004) Action analysis and change blindness: Possible links. Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children, pp. 37-56. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Shechtman, N. and Horowitz, L. M. (2003) Media inequality in conversation: How people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI 2003), pp. 281-288.
32. Zacks, J. M. (2004) Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28, pp. 979-1008.
33. Zacks, J. M. and Tversky, B. (2001) Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, pp. 3-21.
34. Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B. and Iyer, G. (2001) Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, pp. 29-58.