Direct detection of cellular adaptation to local cyclic stretching at the single cell level by atomic force microscopy

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 564-572

  Watanabe Nakayama, Takahiro ^a,b   Machida, Shin Ichi ^a,b   Harada, Ichiro ^a   Sekiguchi, Hiroshi ^a   Afrin, Rehana ^b,c   Ikai, Atsushi ^b  

^a Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology   (Japan)

^b Innovation Laboratory   (Japan)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551672889     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3693     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Butcher, D. T., T. Alliston, and V. M. Weaver. 2009. A tense situation: forcing tumor progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 9:108-122.
2. Wang, N., J. D. Tytell, and D. E. Ingber. 2009. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:75-82.
3. Wozniak, M. A., and C. S. Chen. 2009. Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:34-43.
4. Kole, T. P., Y. Tseng, D. Wirtz. 2004. Rho kinase regulates the intracellular micromechanical response of adherent cells to Rho activation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15:3475-3484.
5. Hoffman, B. D., G. Massiera, J. C. Crocker. 2006. The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:10259-10264.
6. Tseng, Y., T. P. Kole, and D. Wirtz. 2002. Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. Biophys. J. 83:3162-3176.
7. Lee, J. S., P. Panorchan, D. Wirtz. 2006. Ballistic intracellular nanorheology reveals ROCK-hard cytoplasmic stiffening response to fluid flow. J. Cell Sci. 119:1760-1768.
8. Dangaria, J. H., and P. J. Butler. 2007. Macrorheology and adaptive microrheology of endothelial cells subjected to fluid shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 293: C1568-C1575.
9. Trepat, X., L. Deng, J. J. Fredberg. 2007. Universal physical responses to stretch in the living cell. Nature. 447:592-595.
10. Del Alamo, J. C., G. N. Norwich, S. Chien. 2008. Anisotropic rheology and directional mechanotransduction in vascular endothelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:15411-15416.
11. Hale, C. M., S. X. Sun, and D. Wirtz. 2009. Resolving the role of actomyosin contractility in cell microrheology. PLoS ONE. 4: e7054.
12. Krishnan, R., C. Y. Park, J. J. Fredberg. 2009. Reinforcement versus fluidization in cytoskeletal mechanoresponsiveness. PLoS ONE. 4: e5486.
13. Wang, N., and D. E. Ingber. 1995. Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73:327-335.
14. Mizutani, T., H. Haga, and K. Kawabata. 2004. Cellular stiffness response to external deformation: tensional homeostasis in a single fibroblast. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 59:242-248.
15. Deng, L., N. J. Fairbank, G. N. Maksym. 2004. Localized mechanical stress induces time-dependent actin cytoskeletal remodeling and stiffening in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287: C440-C448.
16. Choquet, D., D. P. Felsenfeld, and M. P. Sheetz. 1997. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 88:39-48.
17. Geiger, B., A. Bershadsky, K. M. Yamada. 2001. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:793-805.
18. Geiger, B., and A. Bershadsky. 2001. Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:584-592.
19. Giannone, G., and M. P. Sheetz. 2006. Substrate rigidity and force define form through tyrosine phosphatase and kinase pathways. Trends Cell Biol. 16:213-223.
20. Kaunas, R., P. Nguyen, S. Chien. 2005. Cooperative effects of Rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:15895-15900.
21. Ren, Y., J. C. Effler, D. N. Robinson. 2009. Mechanosensing through cooperative interactions between myosin II and the actin crosslinker cortexillin I. Curr. Biol. 19:1421-1428.
22. Geiger, B., J. P. Spatz, and A. D. Bershadsky. 2009. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:21-33.
23. Del Rio, A., R. Perez-Jimenez, M. P. Sheetz. 2009. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science. 323:638-641.
24. Colombelli, J., A. Besser, E. H. Stelzer. 2009. Mechanosensing in actin stress fibers revealed by a close correlation between force and protein localization. J. Cell Sci. 122:1665-1679.
25. Riveline, D., E. Zamir, A. D. Bershadsky. 2001. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153:1175-1186.
26. Yoshigi, M., L. M. Hoffman, M. C. Beckerle. 2005. Mechanical force mobilizes zyxin from focal adhesions to actin filaments and regulates cytoskeletal reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 171:209-215.
27. Sawada, Y., and M. P. Sheetz. 2002. Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons. J. Cell Biol. 156:609-615.
28. Mizutani, T., K. Kawabata, H. Haga. 2009. Regulation of cellular contractile forcein response tomechanical stretch by diphosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chainvia Rho A signaling cascade. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 66:389-397.
29. Matthews, B. D., D. R. Overby, D. E. Ingber. 2006. Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. J. Cell Sci. 119:508-518.
30. Glogauer, M., P. Arora, C. A. McCulloch. 1997. Calcium ions and tyrosine phosphorylation interact coordinately with actin to regulate cytoprotective responses to stretching. J. Cell Sci. 110:11-21.
31. Wang, N., K. Naruse, D. E. Ingber. 2001. Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:7765-7770.
32. Kasza, K. E., F. Nakamura, D. A. Weitz. 2009. Filamin A is essential for active cell stiffening but not passive stiffening under external force. Biophys. J. 96:4326-4335.
33. Binnig, G., C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber. 1986. Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 930-933.
34. Kim, H., H. Arakawa, A. Ikai. 2003. Quantification of cell adhesion force with AFM: distribution of vitronectin receptors on a living MC3T3-E1 cell. Ultramicroscopy. 97:359-363.
35. Sekiguchi, H., H. Arakawa, A. Ikai. 2003. Specific interaction between GroEL and denatured protein measured by compression-free force spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 85:484-490.
36. Yersin, A., T. Osada, and A. Ikai. 2008. Exploring transferrin-receptor interactions at the single-molecule level. Biophys. J. 94:230-240.
37. Yan, C., A. Yersin, A. Ikai. 2009. Single molecular dynamic interactions between glycophorin A and lectin as probed by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. Chem. 144:72-77.
38. Müller, D. J., J. Helenius, Y. F. Dufrêne. 2009. Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:383-390.
39. Laurent, V. M., S. Kasas, J. J. Meister. 2005. Gradient of rigidity in the lamellipodia of migrating cells revealed by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 89:667-675.
40. Afrin, R., and A. Ikai. 2006. Force profiles of protein pulling with or without cytoskeletal links studied by AFM. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348:238-244.
41. Radmacher, M. 2007. Studying the mechanics of cellular processes by atomic force microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 83:347-372.
42. Lesoil, C., T. Nonaka, A. Ikai. 2010. Molecular shape and binding force of Mycoplasma mobile's leg protein Gli349 revealed by an AFM study. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 391:1312-1317.
43. Prass, M., K. Jacobson, M. Radmacher. 2006. Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell. J. Cell Biol. 174:767-772.
44. Uehara, H., A. Ikai, and T. Osada. 2009. Detection of mRNA in single living cells using AFM nanoprobes. Methods Mol. Biol. 544:599-608.
45. Afrin, R., U. S. Zohora, A. Ikai. 2009. Atomic force microscopy for cellular level manipulation: imaging intracellular structures and DNA delivery through a membrane hole. J. Mol. Recognit. 22:363-372.
46. Hutter, J. L., and J. Bechhoefer. 1993. Calibration of atomic force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 7:1868-1873.
47. Butt, H. J., and M. Jaschke. 1995. Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology. 6:1-7.
48. Puech, P. H., K. Poole, D. J. Muller. 2006. A new technical approach to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM. Ultramicroscopy. 106:637-644.
49. Ono, M., T. Murakami, A. Segawa. 2001. Quantitative comparison of anti-fading mounting media for confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49:305-312.
50. Hirata, H., H. Tatsumi, and M. Sokabe. 2004. Tension-dependent formation of stress fibers in fibroblasts: a study using semi-intact cells. JSME. Int. J. Ser. C. 47:962-969.
51. Barakat, A. I. 2001. A model for shear stress-induced deformation of a flow sensor on the surface of vascular endothelial cells. J. Theor. Biol. 210:221-236.
52. Schmitz, J., M. Benoit, and K.-E. Gottschalk. 2008. The viscoelasticity of membrane tethers and its importance for cell adhesion. Biophys. J. 95:1448-1459.
53. Cooper, J. A. 1987. Effects of cytochalasin and phalloidin on actin. J. Cell Biol. 105:1473-1478.
54. Straight, A. F., A. Cheung, T. J. Mitchison. 2003. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science. 299:1743-1747.
55. Rotsch, C., and M. Radmacher. 2000. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 78:520-535.
56. Wakatsuki, T., B. Schwab, E. L. Elson. 2001. Effects of cytochalasin D and latrunculin B on mechanical properties of cells. J. Cell Sci. 114:1025-1036.
57. Lu, L., S. J. Oswald, F. C. Yin. 2008. Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. Biophys. J. 95:6060-6071.
58. Martens, J. C., and M. Radmacher. 2008. Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II. Pflugers Arch. 456:95-100.
59. Kolega, J. 2004. Phototoxicity and photoinactivation of blebbistatin in UV and visible light. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 320:1020-1025.
60. Hermans, J. J. 1947. Diffusion with discontinuous boundary (1). J. Colloid Sci. 2:387-398.
61. Pellegrin, S., and H. Mellor. 2007. Actin stress fibers. J. Cell Sci. 120:3491-3499.
62. Askari, J. A., P. A. Buckley, M. J. Humphries. 2009. Linking integrin conformation to function. J. Cell Sci. 122:165-170.
63. Friedland, J. C., M. H. Lee, and D. Boettiger. 2009. Mechanically activated integrin switch controls a5b1 function. Science. 323:642-644.
64. Hayakawa, K., H. Tatsumi, and M. Sokabe. 2008. Actin stress fibers transmit and focus force to activate mechanosensitive channels. J. Cell Sci. 121:496-503.
65. Shu, S., X. Liu, and E. D. Korn. 2005. Blebbistatin and blebbistatin-inactivated myosin II inhibit myosin II-independent processes in Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:1472-1477.
66. Laevsky, G., and D. A. Knecht. 2003. Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments. J. Cell Sci. 116:3761-3770.
67. Meili, R., B. Alonso-Latorre, J. C. Lasheras. 2010. Myosin II is essential for the spatiotemporal organization of traction forces during cell motility. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:405-417.