Comparison of vertebral rotation corrected by different techniques and anchors in surgical treatment of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 182-189

  Fu, Gang ^a   Kawakami, Noriaki ^b   Goto, Manabu ^b   Tsuji, Taichi ^b   Ohara, Tetsuya ^b   Imagama, Shiro ^c  

^a Beijing Jishuitan Hospital   (China)

^b Meijo Hospital   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Deformity; Pedicle screw; Posterior instrumented fusion; Rotation; Surgery; Thoracoscopic instrumented fusion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACIC SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA BODY; ADULT; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNAL FIXATOR; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; VERTEBRA;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SCREWS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651154487     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318177028b     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop. 1988;227:10-23. (Pubitemid 18054616)
2. Gardner-Morse M, Stokes IAF. Three-dimensional stimulations of the scoliosis derotation maneuver with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. J Biomechanics. 1994;27:177-181. (Pubitemid 24030790)
3. Bridwell KH. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. Spine. 1994;19:1095-1100. (Pubitemid 24141134)
4. Willers U, Transfeldt EE, Hedlund R. The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on vertebral rotation, rib hump and the thoracic cage in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 1996;5: 387-393. (Pubitemid 26422780)
5. Stasikelis PJ, Pugh LI, Allen BL. Surgical corrections in scoliosis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;7:111-116.
6. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004; 29:343-349.
7. Akcali O, Alici E, Kosay C. Apical instrumentation alters the rotational correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:124-129. (Pubitemid 36566765)
8. Sawatzky BJ, Tredwell SJ, Jang SB, et al. Effects of three-dimensional assessment on surgical correction and on hook strategies in multi-hook instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1998;23:201-205.
9. Yazici M, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A, et al. Measurement of vertebral rotation in standing versus supine position in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:252-256. (Pubitemid 32180105)
10. Villemure I, Aubin CE, Grimard G, et al. Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study. Spine. 2001;26:2244-2250. (Pubitemid 32979524)
11. Upadhyay SS, Mullaji AB, Luk KD, et al. Relation of spinal and thoracic cage deformities and their flexibilities with altered pulmonary functions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20:2415-2420.
12. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1056-1067.
13. Lenke LG. Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:S36-S43. (Pubitemid 36959581)
14. Newton PO, Marks M, Faro F, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in scoliosis surgery. Spine. 2003;28:S249-S254. (Pubitemid 37266734)
15. Wong HK, Hee HT, Yu Z, et al. Results of thoracoscopic instrumented fusion versus conventional posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing selective thoracic fusion. Spine. 2004;29:2031-2038; discussion 2039. (Pubitemid 40202274)
16. Aaro S, Dahlborn M. Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine. 1981;6:460-467.
17. Omeroglu H, Ozekin O, Bicimoglu A. Measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis using the Perdriolle torsionmeter: a clinical study on intraobserver and interobserver error. Eur Spine J. 1996;5:167-171. (Pubitemid 26266966)
18. Richards BS. Measurement error in assessment of vertebral rotation using the Perdriolle torsionmeter. Spine. 1992;17:513-517.
19. Krismer M, Sterzinger W, Haid C, et al. Axial rotation measurement of scoliotic vertebrae by means of computed tomography scans. Spine. 1996;21:576-581. (Pubitemid 26077796)
20. Ecker ML, Betz RR, Trent PS, et al. Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1988;13:1141-1144. (Pubitemid 18278101)
21. Wood KB, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie JW, et al. Rotational changes of the vertebral-pelvic axis following Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine. 1991;16:S404-S408.
22. Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W. Scoliosis correction by Cotrel- Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction. Spine. 1992;17:S263-S269.
23. Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2001; 26:E74-E79.
24. Luk KD, Lu DS, Cheung KM, et al. A prospective comparison of the coronal deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis using four different instrumentations and the fulcrum-bending radiograph. Spine. 2004;29:560-563.
25. Vaughan JJ, Winter RB, Lonstein JE. Comparison of the use of supine bending and traction radiographs in the selection of the fusion area in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1996;21: 2469-2473.
26. Polly DW Jr, Sturm PF. Traction versus supine side bending. Which technique best determines curve flexibility? Spine. 1998;23:804-808.
27. White AA, Panjabi MM. Practical biomechanics of scoliosis and kyphosis. In: White AA, Panjabi MM, eds. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co; 1990:138-143.
28. Beuerlein MJ, Raso VJ, Hill DL, et al. Changes in alignment of the scoliotic spine in response to lateral bending. Spine. 2003;28; 693-698.
29. Veldhuizen AG, Scholten PJ. Kinematics of the scoliotic spine as related to the normal spine. Spine. 1987;12:852-858.
30. Majd ME, Castro FP, Holt RT. Anterior fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000;25:696-702.
31. Turi M, Johnston CE II, Richards BS. Anterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis using TSRH instrumentation. Spine. 1993;18: 417-422. (Pubitemid 23104480)
32. Johnston CE II. Anterior correction of thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Semin Spine Surg. 1997;9:150-163. (Pubitemid 27297352)
33. Suk SI, Kim W, Lee S, et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine. 2001;26:2049-2057.
34. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine. 2004;29:333-342.
35. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29:2040-2048. (Pubitemid 40202276)
36. Polly DW Jr, Potter BK, Kuklo T, et al. Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks. Spine. 2003;29:63-69.
37. Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, et al. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine. 2001;26:2340-2346.
38. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine. 1990;15:11-14.
39. Liljenqvist U, Hackenbarg L, Link TH, et al. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001;67:157-163. (Pubitemid 32428566)